<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post goes Video &#8212; Big Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitrios</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimitrios]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Cool...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kapustka</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Kapustka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;A., agree that Milbank&#039;s post had &quot;team&quot; support -- but with Walt Mossberg manning his own videocam, I think the trend will be more reporters with cameras, even on deadline. Smarter operations like the WP may realize early on that having a dedicated edit/production/camera team will put them ahead in the quality race as well.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A., agree that Milbank&#8217;s post had &#8220;team&#8221; support &#8212; but with Walt Mossberg manning his own videocam, I think the trend will be more reporters with cameras, even on deadline. Smarter operations like the WP may realize early on that having a dedicated edit/production/camera team will put them ahead in the quality race as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;nice story - but you neglect to mention all that video and possible the entire production was on the shoulders of Akira Hakuta - the producer - not Dana Milbank.  A correspondent editorializing in &quot;reporter notebook&quot; style is a nice touch for print - but i believe you go to far in thinking old school correspondents will be shooting, editing and composing video spots when they are on deadline for the paper.  Kudos to the WP and to you for your fine coverage of multimedia.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice story &#8211; but you neglect to mention all that video and possible the entire production was on the shoulders of Akira Hakuta &#8211; the producer &#8211; not Dana Milbank.  A correspondent editorializing in &#8220;reporter notebook&#8221; style is a nice touch for print &#8211; but i believe you go to far in thinking old school correspondents will be shooting, editing and composing video spots when they are on deadline for the paper.  Kudos to the WP and to you for your fine coverage of multimedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WashPost ramps up the video content &#187; mathewingram.com/media</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WashPost ramps up the video content &#187; mathewingram.com/media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Kapustka, one of the writers at Om Malik&#8217;s NewTeeVee, has a great look at the Washington Post&#8217;s increasing use of video, which started with the great OnBeing [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kapustka, one of the writers at Om Malik&#8217;s NewTeeVee, has a great look at the Washington Post&#8217;s increasing use of video, which started with the great OnBeing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kapustka</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Kapustka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;We just got an email from the Post, saying that embed code will be part of the rollout as they progress... !&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just got an email from the Post, saying that embed code will be part of the rollout as they progress&#8230; !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Notes &#187; video subtly enhanced the newspaper site</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Notes &#187; video subtly enhanced the newspaper site]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] I&#8217;ll have to poke around later when I&#8217;m at a computer with speakers (and, uh, not at work), but according to NewTeeVee, the Washington Post&#8217;s video-centric redesign is a big deal: [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll have to poke around later when I&#8217;m at a computer with speakers (and, uh, not at work), but according to NewTeeVee, the Washington Post&#8217;s video-centric redesign is a big deal: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattt_</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mattt_]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/washington-post-goes-video-big-time/#comment-445496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Soon reporters will have Justin.Tv headsets giving us POV  images and interviews&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon reporters will have Justin.Tv headsets giving us POV  images and interviews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

