Comments on: Survey Says: Poor Video Quality Drives Watchers Away http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/ Sat, 26 May 2012 00:44:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Alex Beevers http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449175 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:53:31 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449175 I believe that HD is the way to go, nobody wants to watch a video that has poor quality. Thats why people need to view there video in diffrent softwares to make sure they look good, before they place it on the internet for everyone else to see.

]]> By: » Blog Archive » The Bubble May Soon Burst for Digital Content Company Valuations http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449174 Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:31:56 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449174 [...] lawsuit against YouTube, and also seemed to coincide with growing dissatisfaction with the poor quality of most online video content. Sony’s move may soon be considered to have been a shrewd one. YouTube certainly had all the [...]

]]> By: User Generated Video: It Is Big & Crisp In Japan « NewTeeVee http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449173 Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:00:57 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449173 [...] may say the same about US-based video sharing sites in the US. YouTube has all the traffic, but the video quality is not anything to write home [...]

]]> By: Kfir Pravda http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449172 Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:29:07 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449172 We’ve did a piece yesterday about Stage6. If video quality was the most inportant factor, Stage6 that offers much better video quality, was a huge success. As you can see in our post – they are not …
http://pravdam.com/2007/08/08/guest-writer-guy-nesher-what-went-wrong-with-stage6/

]]> By: Small World News » New Video On Net Studies…Quality not Gadgetry http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449171 Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:09:33 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449171 [...] few days ago NewTeevee blogged about this interesting study commissioned by Akamai. It found that one of the biggest headaches for viewers of video on the web are the inexorable [...]

]]> By: Om Malik http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449170 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:45:25 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449170 Mark,

So colorful in your description. Love it.

]]> By: Charles Iliya Krempeaux http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449169 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:48:03 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449169 It’s my (perhaps subjective) assessment that poor audio quality is much much worse than poor video quality.

People seem to be more forgiving of less than perfect video than they are of audio.

– Charles Iliya Krempeaux
http://changelog.ca/

]]> By: mark day http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449168 Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:56:33 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449168 Did the survey note how much dissatisfaction was created by poor video quality of “free” online porn content?

Because that probably screwed the pooch… I mean skewed the results.

Just sayin’.

]]> By: Frank Sinton http://gigaom.com/video/video-quality/#comment-449167 Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:19:20 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-449167 There is already a ton of HD content that is available for download out there. Here is just a small sampling:

http://www.mefeedia.com/lists/81/

These are all available for download into Miro (preferred) or iTunes, making it viewable for offline as well as online viewing and even available for viewing on the TV. :)

The problem is that a lot of the 1st generation video sites are still caught up with the ease of Flash video. The 2nd generation online video networks – such as Mefeedia :-) – bring together quality content and make it available openly to enjoy WHENEVER and WHEREVER you want.

]]>