<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Road with The Walkstars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/the-walkstars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-walkstars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: city of angels</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-walkstars/#comment-444323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[city of angels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/02/20/the-walkstars/#comment-444323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;YouTube  more reliable of burro-band network? Now that&#039;s truly  amusing:) Never mind the eternal quantity vs. quality argument. As a benchmark for  &quot;Web 2.0 technology&quot;  I&#039;ll take an 18th century  Franciscan friar&#039;s hand-written diary over a YouTube post any day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Need I remind you of the long-standing IETF RFC 1149 - &quot;A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers&quot; (1990)? &lt;a href=&quot;http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Or the Israeli project that compared the reliability homing pigeons to contemporary packet switching technologies (2004)? A New Israeli test confirms: PEI (Pigeon Enabled Internet) is FASTER then ADSL: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.notes.co.il/benbasat/5240.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Long Live The Tubes!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube  more reliable of burro-band network? Now that&#8217;s truly  amusing:) Never mind the eternal quantity vs. quality argument. As a benchmark for  &#8220;Web 2.0 technology&#8221;  I&#8217;ll take an 18th century  Franciscan friar&#8217;s hand-written diary over a YouTube post any day.</p>
<p>Need I remind you of the long-standing IETF RFC 1149 &#8211; &#8220;A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers&#8221; (1990)? <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149" rel="nofollow"></a> Or the Israeli project that compared the reliability homing pigeons to contemporary packet switching technologies (2004)? A New Israeli test confirms: PEI (Pigeon Enabled Internet) is FASTER then ADSL: <a href="http://www.notes.co.il/benbasat/5240.asp" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
<p>Long Live The Tubes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson West</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-walkstars/#comment-444322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/02/20/the-walkstars/#comment-444322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I actually did mention the mission trail to Peter, and it was news to him.  The NewTeeVee news is that, unlike the early Spanish missionaries, travellers can now upload clips filmed on their journey to YouTube as a travelogue.  It&#039;s a lot faster than the old burro-band network.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually did mention the mission trail to Peter, and it was news to him.  The NewTeeVee news is that, unlike the early Spanish missionaries, travellers can now upload clips filmed on their journey to YouTube as a travelogue.  It&#8217;s a lot faster than the old burro-band network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: city of angels</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-walkstars/#comment-444321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[city of angels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/02/20/the-walkstars/#comment-444321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;So what&#039;s special about this efforts other than it&#039;s being performed by a few computer/internet geeks that are completely ignorant of California history?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the curious, you can &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; walk the almost entire length of California by following the route established  by Catholic Missionaries in the mid-18th century (1769). Each mission was originally built to be distance one day&#039;s walk apart. Many of the original mission sites are still extant, and some offer lodging on-site (or very nearby).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Populist Overview from Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_missions#Missions_in_present.E2.80.93day_California_.28U.S..29&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Callifornia Missions Study Association
http://www.ca-missions.org/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;California Missions Foundation
http://www.missionsofcalifornia.org/missions/index.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Clearly &quot;walking tours&quot;  of California offering far more detailed documentation than today&#039;s standard videoblogger have been readily available for more than 200 years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Frankly, I&#039;d have been more impressed if &quot;The Walksters&quot; had partnered with one of the many California Historical Societies, in an effort to contribute to a &quot;real world&quot; community.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m just sayin&#039;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s special about this efforts other than it&#8217;s being performed by a few computer/internet geeks that are completely ignorant of California history?</p>
<p>For the curious, you can <em>still</em> walk the almost entire length of California by following the route established  by Catholic Missionaries in the mid-18th century (1769). Each mission was originally built to be distance one day&#8217;s walk apart. Many of the original mission sites are still extant, and some offer lodging on-site (or very nearby).</p>
<p>Populist Overview from Wikipedia<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_missions#Missions_in_present.E2.80.93day_California_.28U.S" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_missions#Missions_in_present.E2.80.93day_California_.28U.S</a>..29</p>
<p>Callifornia Missions Study Association<br />
<a href="http://www.ca-missions.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ca-missions.org/</a></p>
<p>California Missions Foundation<br />
<a href="http://www.missionsofcalifornia.org/missions/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.missionsofcalifornia.org/missions/index.html</a></p>
<p>Clearly &#8220;walking tours&#8221;  of California offering far more detailed documentation than today&#8217;s standard videoblogger have been readily available for more than 200 years.</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;d have been more impressed if &#8220;The Walksters&#8221; had partnered with one of the many California Historical Societies, in an effort to contribute to a &#8220;real world&#8221; community.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

