<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Recycling of a Web Series: Reborn Showbizzle Learns From Its Mistakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/the-recycling-of-a-web-series-reborn-showbizzle-learns-from-its-mistakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-recycling-of-a-web-series-reborn-showbizzle-learns-from-its-mistakes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Series Branding Opps to be Auctioned Off, Starting at $50,000</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-recycling-of-a-web-series-reborn-showbizzle-learns-from-its-mistakes/#comment-473691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Series Branding Opps to be Auctioned Off, Starting at $50,000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=27569#comment-473691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] of series &#8212; all have potential, but I&#8217;ve never been blown away by Hedge Fund, and while Showbizzle improved from one incarnation to the next, it was only by a small margin. However, the opportunity this opens up for series of all quality [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of series &#8212; all have potential, but I&#8217;ve never been blown away by Hedge Fund, and while Showbizzle improved from one incarnation to the next, it was only by a small margin. However, the opportunity this opens up for series of all quality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Web Files</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-recycling-of-a-web-series-reborn-showbizzle-learns-from-its-mistakes/#comment-473690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Web Files]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=27569#comment-473690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Check out our interview with Charles and Lindsey Rosin of Showbizzle:  http://bit.ly/1ach3L&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out our interview with Charles and Lindsey Rosin of Showbizzle:  <a href="http://bit.ly/1ach3L" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1ach3L</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-recycling-of-a-web-series-reborn-showbizzle-learns-from-its-mistakes/#comment-473689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=27569#comment-473689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey there Liz,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the response :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Right, gotcha - so is it a review that&#039;s been rewritten over an existing template? Or is it a new entry (template-wise, at least)? It would be cool to have updated, as it is a wee bit of a difference in perception :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the heads-up, appreciate it!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there Liz,</p>
<p>Thanks for the response :)</p>
<p>Right, gotcha &#8211; so is it a review that&#8217;s been rewritten over an existing template? Or is it a new entry (template-wise, at least)? It would be cool to have updated, as it is a wee bit of a difference in perception :)</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads-up, appreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Shannon Miller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-recycling-of-a-web-series-reborn-showbizzle-learns-from-its-mistakes/#comment-473688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz Shannon Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=27569#comment-473688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey, Danny, great question.  The two stars are from the original review -- we&#039;re still figuring out a way to compensate for the new rating and the old one within the site template (as this is the first time we&#039;ve rereviewed a show).  I would definitely increase the rating to three stars, though!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Danny, great question.  The two stars are from the original review &#8212; we&#8217;re still figuring out a way to compensate for the new rating and the old one within the site template (as this is the first time we&#8217;ve rereviewed a show).  I would definitely increase the rating to three stars, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/the-recycling-of-a-web-series-reborn-showbizzle-learns-from-its-mistakes/#comment-473687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=27569#comment-473687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi Liz,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have to admit to being a little confused by your review. I get the impression (from your content) that Showbizzle has realized the mistakes they made last year, took them on and pretty much eliminated them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There still seems to be minor issues, but overall perhaps they&#039;ll improve as the show continues (overdubs being one example).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But generally you&#039;re saying that the new elements work well and there&#039;s a lot to be admired. Which is why the 2-star rating confuses?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Liz,</p>
<p>I have to admit to being a little confused by your review. I get the impression (from your content) that Showbizzle has realized the mistakes they made last year, took them on and pretty much eliminated them.</p>
<p>There still seems to be minor issues, but overall perhaps they&#8217;ll improve as the show continues (overdubs being one example).</p>
<p>But generally you&#8217;re saying that the new elements work well and there&#8217;s a lot to be admired. Which is why the 2-star rating confuses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

