<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Pays Rocketboom 7 Figures in Distribution Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocketboom&#8217;s Magma Aims to Be Ultimate Viral Tracker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocketboom&#8217;s Magma Aims to Be Ultimate Viral Tracker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Baron has proposed many big ideas over the years so sometimes it&#8217;s our job to wait and see which ones turn out and which ones don&#8217;t. The project is bootstrapped at this point and looking for an angel [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Baron has proposed many big ideas over the years so sometimes it&#8217;s our job to wait and see which ones turn out and which ones don&#8217;t. The project is bootstrapped at this point and looking for an angel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Sponsors Rocketboom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Intel Sponsors Rocketboom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] licenses and distributes Rocketboom through a &#8220;seven-figure&#8221; guaranteed revenue share deal signed last summer. Despite that funding, Rocketboom has not made the kind of viewer numbers or had [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] licenses and distributes Rocketboom through a &#8220;seven-figure&#8221; guaranteed revenue share deal signed last summer. Despite that funding, Rocketboom has not made the kind of viewer numbers or had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeks meme &#187; Intel Sponsors Rocketboom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geeks meme &#187; Intel Sponsors Rocketboom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] licenses and distributes Rocketboom through a &#8220;seven-figure&#8221; guaranteed revenue share deal signed last summer. Despite that funding, Rocketboom has not made the kind of viewer numbers or had [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] licenses and distributes Rocketboom through a &#8220;seven-figure&#8221; guaranteed revenue share deal signed last summer. Despite that funding, Rocketboom has not made the kind of viewer numbers or had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocketboom Goes (Lisa) Nova &#124; Real Big Firm</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocketboom Goes (Lisa) Nova &#124; Real Big Firm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] August of this year, Rocketboom signed a seven-figure distribution deal with Sony Pictures Television, and it looks like that move is paying off. Unlike Revision3, which [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August of this year, Rocketboom signed a seven-figure distribution deal with Sony Pictures Television, and it looks like that move is paying off. Unlike Revision3, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocketboom Goes (Lisa) Nova &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocketboom Goes (Lisa) Nova &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] August of this year, Rocketboom signed a seven-figure distribution deal with Sony Pictures Television, and it looks like that move is paying off. Unlike Revision3, which [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August of this year, Rocketboom signed a seven-figure distribution deal with Sony Pictures Television, and it looks like that move is paying off. Unlike Revision3, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gREG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gREG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;GIVE ME A DISTRIBUTION DEAL, BEFORE I HAVE MICKEY MOUSE PUNCH YOU IN YOUR BIG ASS NOSE!!!!!!!!!......LOLOLOLOLOLOL&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GIVE ME A DISTRIBUTION DEAL, BEFORE I HAVE MICKEY MOUSE PUNCH YOU IN YOUR BIG ASS NOSE!!!!!!!!!&#8230;&#8230;LOLOLOLOLOLOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Family Values? &#171; Abileneestablishment&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Family Values? &#171; Abileneestablishment&#8217;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] he cofounded, Baron &amp; Budd, and is a regular on blog Overlawyered. More interesting is that Amanda Congdon intervened in order to protect her claim on part of the company. Meanwhile, the younger Baron complains all this legal wrangling tied his dealmaking hands, and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he cofounded, Baron &amp; Budd, and is a regular on blog Overlawyered. More interesting is that Amanda Congdon intervened in order to protect her claim on part of the company. Meanwhile, the younger Baron complains all this legal wrangling tied his dealmaking hands, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TEC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TEC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;RB has never been the same since Amanda left....oh wait...maybe it has been exactly the same in which they tried to drop in a new (mediocre) host without adaptation or changes. While I continue to have RB on my links bar, it is rarely clicked. Maybe once every two months. IMO, Amanda made the show what it was, and its now uninteresting and blah.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RB has never been the same since Amanda left&#8230;.oh wait&#8230;maybe it has been exactly the same in which they tried to drop in a new (mediocre) host without adaptation or changes. While I continue to have RB on my links bar, it is rarely clicked. Maybe once every two months. IMO, Amanda made the show what it was, and its now uninteresting and blah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SR</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@Liz:  Besides the pre-breakup NY Times link above, I don&#039;t have specific links at my fingertips as I&#039;ve been reading about the Andrew-Amanda differences in a wide variety of publications and blogs over the years.  I think googling all the usual outlets will probably yield good results.  Here&#039;s a very recent result:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://valleywag.com/5033448/how-daddys-money-paid-for-andrew-barons-rocketboom&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Paul - Good point.  Andrew does seem to be claiming the victory as total vindication when the decision is a good deal narrower than that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And one of these days, someone is going to have to explain to me why New York&#039;s Supreme Court isn&#039;t also its highest court.  Didn&#039;t the authors of the NY state constitution get the memo on what &quot;supreme&quot; means?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Liz:  Besides the pre-breakup NY Times link above, I don&#8217;t have specific links at my fingertips as I&#8217;ve been reading about the Andrew-Amanda differences in a wide variety of publications and blogs over the years.  I think googling all the usual outlets will probably yield good results.  Here&#8217;s a very recent result:</p>
<p><a href="http://valleywag.com/5033448/how-daddys-money-paid-for-andrew-barons-rocketboom" rel="nofollow">http://valleywag.com/5033448/how-daddys-money-paid-for-andrew-barons-rocketboom</a></p>
<p>@Paul &#8211; Good point.  Andrew does seem to be claiming the victory as total vindication when the decision is a good deal narrower than that.</p>
<p>And one of these days, someone is going to have to explain to me why New York&#8217;s Supreme Court isn&#8217;t also its highest court.  Didn&#8217;t the authors of the NY state constitution get the memo on what &#8220;supreme&#8221; means?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Frankenstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/sony-pays-rocketboom-7-figures-in-distribution-deal/#comment-461421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Frankenstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=6076#comment-461421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;As a side note on terminology, the Supreme Court of New York is the trial court, not an appellate court.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Moreover, the court held that the question of ownership of RB was irrelevant to the court action brought by the elder Barron; it didn&#039;t rule one way or another on the underlying issue of whether or not Congdon was still a 49% owner of RB.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a side note on terminology, the Supreme Court of New York is the trial court, not an appellate court.</p>
<p>Moreover, the court held that the question of ownership of RB was irrelevant to the court action brought by the elder Barron; it didn&#8217;t rule one way or another on the underlying issue of whether or not Congdon was still a 49% owner of RB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

