Comments on: Shady Secrets of Going Viral on YouTube

By: Estimate: 20% of Web Videos are Spam

Estimate: 20% of Web Videos are Spam — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:15:39 +0000

[...] techniques are nothing new — see our previous coverage — but it’s notable that they’ve become so [...]

By: 750industries Raises $1M « NewTeeVee

750industries Raises $1M « NewTeeVee — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:23:44 +0000

[...] of him. We confirmed the funding with Greenberg today. Greenberg had previously stirred up a ton of controversy with a post on TechCrunch about methods for sneaky (and some would say slimey) promotion of videos [...]

By: Mongo Slade

Mongo Slade — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:32:43 +0000

I say Dan is the Man and haters should just fall back!
Hey Dan when u get a moment holla at me…

By: Andy Wibbels » Viral Videos: Marketing or Mistake?

Andy Wibbels » Viral Videos: Marketing or Mistake? — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:20:08 +0000

[...] NewTeeVee, following up on an earlier article on how to master viral video advertising, penned an interesting post about how a Stanford graduate student achieved over 20 million views on YouTube – but not [...]

By: JT

JT — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:24:52 +0000

Dan, re: “It makes me sad to see people question my moral fiber like that.”

There’s not much really to question, is there? Since you are in it for the money (clearly), you should enjoy the dollars you are probably making off it. If you are more interested in being able to hold your head up high and have pride in the work you do, well, you certainly need to find some new tactics that have a bit more honesty in them, don’t you?

By: Jay

Jay — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:51:13 +0000

This really doesn’t come as a surprise at all. This is what marketeres and PR people do, they create a story and excitement where their isn’t one.

As long as companies wan’t to sell a product there will (and should be) companies that will help optimize this as inexpensively as possible.

http://www.yawpco.com

By: Deva Hazarika

Deva Hazarika — Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:23:55 +0000

“see what YouTube can and will do to prevent subversive gaming tactics”

The only thing subverted here is some utopian ideal of some qualitative notion of “best” content rising to the top. YouTube (or TechMeme or Digg or whatever else) hasn’t been “pure” in that manner for a long time. Whether it’s money or SEO or contacts or friends w/ blogs, “organic” growth has been “stimulated” with external triggers for a long time. That article just makes it seem a little more mercenary in nature, but in reality some form of that is going on with a huge percentage of popular stuff on all the content aggregation sites.

By: sdf

sdf — Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:01:36 +0000

Dan = new and improved sock puppet.

By: Jim Kukral

Jim Kukral — Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:37:21 +0000

Dan, I also don’t see what the big deal is. What you’re doing (what you blogged about on Techcrunch) is a waste of time unless you’re getting paid for views as you were.

Otherwise, getting a crap load of views is really pointless unless it feeds your ego or you’re driving traffic to a porn site.

I’d be willing to see you do a follow up though that explains exactly how to monetize getting a ton of views or going viral. Would you do that? I’d give you my blog to do it if you wish, unedited. jim@ jim kukral.com.

http://www.jimkukral.com

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:33:42 +0000

As someone who works in PR, I find it quite distressing that things like spamming emails, comments and forums are seen as “strategic techniques” or even as acceptable.

Just because these practices happen elsewhere doesn’t mean they’re best practices. This is glorified spamming.