<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R.I.P. UGC Ads 2006-2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/rip-ugc-ads-2006-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/rip-ugc-ads-2006-2007/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark day</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/rip-ugc-ads-2006-2007/#comment-452026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark day]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/21/rip-ugc-ads-2006-2007/#comment-452026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Andy Dick wasn&#039;t available for this one?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Andy Dick wasn&#8217;t available for this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Schoneveld</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/rip-ugc-ads-2006-2007/#comment-452025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Schoneveld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/21/rip-ugc-ads-2006-2007/#comment-452025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, that campaign is not very impressive in concept.  But I am impressed with how much money they must have spent to get David Spade on board and build that lavish set.  Pretty wild.

We&#039;ve been trending away from pure CGA and more towards a &quot;prosumer&quot; model for creative advertising.  Brands are telling us that those big, crazy Heinze-type moves aren&#039;t for them, but they do like the quality they can get from a more focused approach.  Not opening it to the whole world to make ridiculous Axe films, but more targeted to people who want to actually make a career in advertising, but who aren&#039;t yet pros.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that campaign is not very impressive in concept.  But I am impressed with how much money they must have spent to get David Spade on board and build that lavish set.  Pretty wild.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been trending away from pure CGA and more towards a &#8220;prosumer&#8221; model for creative advertising.  Brands are telling us that those big, crazy Heinze-type moves aren&#8217;t for them, but they do like the quality they can get from a more focused approach.  Not opening it to the whole world to make ridiculous Axe films, but more targeted to people who want to actually make a career in advertising, but who aren&#8217;t yet pros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

