<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revision3 Views Up 140% Despite Self-Imposed Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Episode 6: January 29, 2009 : Tech Gang Show</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/#comment-467493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Episode 6: January 29, 2009 : Tech Gang Show]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=17065#comment-467493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] down on Michael Dell for offering help at Davos Muxtape Is Back As A Mixtape Platform For Bands Revision3 Views Up 140% Despite Self-Imposed Standards Western Digital debuts 2TB Green Power hard drives New OLPC Mockup at Davos  touch screen based [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] down on Michael Dell for offering help at Davos Muxtape Is Back As A Mixtape Platform For Bands Revision3 Views Up 140% Despite Self-Imposed Standards Western Digital debuts 2TB Green Power hard drives New OLPC Mockup at Davos  touch screen based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erfed - Of Life, Of Web. &#187; Online Video Still Gaining Popularity, Views</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/#comment-467492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erfed - Of Life, Of Web. &#187; Online Video Still Gaining Popularity, Views]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=17065#comment-467492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Similarly, nextnewnetworks (whose largest draw is the Obama Girl, whom they acquired in 2008) reported 300 million video views in 2008, up from the 100 million they saw in 2007. It&#8217;s noteworthy that the two companies take their metrics differently - Revision3 only counts videos fully watched, whereas nextnewnetworks counts videos started, as pointed out by NewTeeVee. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Similarly, nextnewnetworks (whose largest draw is the Obama Girl, whom they acquired in 2008) reported 300 million video views in 2008, up from the 100 million they saw in 2007. It&#8217;s noteworthy that the two companies take their metrics differently &#8211; Revision3 only counts videos fully watched, whereas nextnewnetworks counts videos started, as pointed out by NewTeeVee. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Louderback</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/#comment-467491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Louderback]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=17065#comment-467491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the coverage Liz.  Yes, compared to some others, our numbers are small.  But from where we sit, quality of viewers, depth of experience and engagement are what&#039;s important, not reach and frequency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can get a zillion views on a YouTube video of a cat riding a donkey, yet make no money - because marketers don&#039;t want to be associated with non-episodic, non-predictable content.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hats of to NNN for delivering great views of their episodic programming, and Break for their success.  But in the end it&#039;s whether we&#039;re producing content that brands want to be associated with.  And when it comes to Diggnation, Tekzilla, Hak5, SYSTM and our other 7 shows (and NNN&#039;s IndyMogul, Threadbanger and others), clearly we&#039;re delivering very valuable audiences that marketers are embracing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not the size, it&#039;s whether anyone will pay for your audience.   And in our case, at least, the dollars are rolling in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I put up more thoughts on reach, frequency and web video on my personal blog, check it out here - http://louderback.com/2009/web-videos-powerful-third-dimension-depth/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;jim louderback, ceo revision3&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the coverage Liz.  Yes, compared to some others, our numbers are small.  But from where we sit, quality of viewers, depth of experience and engagement are what&#8217;s important, not reach and frequency.</p>
<p>You can get a zillion views on a YouTube video of a cat riding a donkey, yet make no money &#8211; because marketers don&#8217;t want to be associated with non-episodic, non-predictable content.</p>
<p>Hats of to NNN for delivering great views of their episodic programming, and Break for their success.  But in the end it&#8217;s whether we&#8217;re producing content that brands want to be associated with.  And when it comes to Diggnation, Tekzilla, Hak5, SYSTM and our other 7 shows (and NNN&#8217;s IndyMogul, Threadbanger and others), clearly we&#8217;re delivering very valuable audiences that marketers are embracing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the size, it&#8217;s whether anyone will pay for your audience.   And in our case, at least, the dollars are rolling in.</p>
<p>I put up more thoughts on reach, frequency and web video on my personal blog, check it out here &#8211; <a href="http://louderback.com/2009/web-videos-powerful-third-dimension-depth/" rel="nofollow">http://louderback.com/2009/web-videos-powerful-third-dimension-depth/</a></p>
<ul>
<li>jim louderback, ceo revision3</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Gannes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/#comment-467490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz Gannes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=17065#comment-467490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice, thanks Ash.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, thanks Ash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wilhelm</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/#comment-467489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Wilhelm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=17065#comment-467489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I give my accolades to R3 for doing this. We have long needed more stringent standards for any online service. Video was just the most egregious example.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give my accolades to R3 for doing this. We have long needed more stringent standards for any online service. Video was just the most egregious example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashkan karbasfrooshan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/#comment-467488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ashkan karbasfrooshan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=17065#comment-467488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If you want more comparables, I just ran the figures:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WatchMojo.com did 28M streams in 2008, which was up from 13M in 2007, which was a 115% spike.  All-time, we’ve almost hit 50M in 3 years, which I guess is not too shabby.  But, we don&#039;t give away our content so I presume the figure could be more.  And we also have a large reach in the OOH space, reaching 15-20M consumers each month.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want more comparables, I just ran the figures:</p>
<p>WatchMojo.com did 28M streams in 2008, which was up from 13M in 2007, which was a 115% spike.  All-time, we’ve almost hit 50M in 3 years, which I guess is not too shabby.  But, we don&#8217;t give away our content so I presume the figure could be more.  And we also have a large reach in the OOH space, reaching 15-20M consumers each month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HipMojo.com &#187; WatchMojo.com Grows Streams by 115% to Nearly 30M from 2007 to 2008</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/revision3-views-up-140-despite-self-imposed-standards/#comment-467487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HipMojo.com &#187; WatchMojo.com Grows Streams by 115% to Nearly 30M from 2007 to 2008]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=17065#comment-467487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] we also didn&#8217;t raise $9M and $23M respectively, but I digress. Online video studio Revision3 said today its program views are up 140 percent, with 46 million views in 2008 as compared to 19 million [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we also didn&#8217;t raise $9M and $23M respectively, but I digress. Online video studio Revision3 said today its program views are up 140 percent, with 46 million views in 2008 as compared to 19 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

