<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: P2P Advertising: Just More Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payment By P2P? &#124; Fraz Us !</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Payment By P2P? &#124; Fraz Us !]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] client. Others have claimed to deliver ads over P2P networks before, but most of those efforts were little more than thinly disguised spam, and no other company has so far proposed to give rights holders a cut of its P2P ad [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] client. Others have claimed to deliver ads over P2P networks before, but most of those efforts were little more than thinly disguised spam, and no other company has so far proposed to give rights holders a cut of its P2P ad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can P2P Be Made to Pay?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can P2P Be Made to Pay?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] client. Others have claimed to deliver ads over P2P networks before, but most of those efforts were little more than thinly disguised spam, and no other company has so far proposed to give rights holders a cut of its P2P ad [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] client. Others have claimed to deliver ads over P2P networks before, but most of those efforts were little more than thinly disguised spam, and no other company has so far proposed to give rights holders a cut of its P2P ad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gry online</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gry online]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Great job! Very thx!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job! Very thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Reasons There Is No Adwords for P2P Yet - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Five Reasons There Is No Adwords for P2P Yet - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] just went under last week. Users of file-sharing clients like Limewire are also getting targeted by rogue spammers, porn advertisers, virus writers and other annoyances, which makes it harder and harder to find the content for which [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just went under last week. Users of file-sharing clients like Limewire are also getting targeted by rogue spammers, porn advertisers, virus writers and other annoyances, which makes it harder and harder to find the content for which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gry logiczne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gry logiczne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thsi is very interesting blog! Thank you for your work!
Cool blog :)!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thsi is very interesting blog! Thank you for your work!<br />
Cool blog :)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee Mediadefender Moves into P2P Marketing &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewTeeVee Mediadefender Moves into P2P Marketing &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] And with that, the learning curve began. &#8220;We&#8217;re throwing things at the wall and see what sticks,&#8221; he explains. Early attempts to do advertising on P2P networks involved what Lee describes as a &#8220;bait and switch&#8221;. Files were mislabeled in order to get people to watch ads or load Web pages. &#8220;Obviously there are tremendous problems with that,&#8221; he acknowledges. Most brands just don&#8217;t like to frustrate their customers –- except, of course, porn companies, which still use this technique heavily to spam P2P networks. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And with that, the learning curve began. &#8220;We&#8217;re throwing things at the wall and see what sticks,&#8221; he explains. Early attempts to do advertising on P2P networks involved what Lee describes as a &#8220;bait and switch&#8221;. Files were mislabeled in order to get people to watch ads or load Web pages. &#8220;Obviously there are tremendous problems with that,&#8221; he acknowledges. Most brands just don&#8217;t like to frustrate their customers –- except, of course, porn companies, which still use this technique heavily to spam P2P networks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHRIS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CHRIS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Try CUXLDEN For Lite Server, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is new breed of p2p application.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.download.com/CUXLDEN-For-Lite-Server/3000-2196_4-10633351.html?tag=lst-0-1&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These are the overview of the product.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CUXLDEN For Lite Server makes it possible for very large files like online game files, HD movies, original UCC movies and zipped back up files that required high cost in distributing to be easily distributed to thousands of users with little cost incurred. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;CUXLDEN For Lite Server&quot;, has a great capability of distribution with one single computer with Internet connection through peer-to-peer network. Compared to existing client-server based file distribution method that require dozens of ftp/http servers and incurs high cost, this product is economically and functionally far advanced than client-server based.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VERY COOL! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With this program, Who need file hosting now???&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try CUXLDEN For Lite Server, </p>
<p>This is new breed of p2p application.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.download.com/CUXLDEN-For-Lite-Server/3000-2196_4-10633351.html?tag=lst-0-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.download.com/CUXLDEN-For-Lite-Server/3000-2196_4-10633351.html?tag=lst-0-1</a></p>
<p>These are the overview of the product.</p>
<p>CUXLDEN For Lite Server makes it possible for very large files like online game files, HD movies, original UCC movies and zipped back up files that required high cost in distributing to be easily distributed to thousands of users with little cost incurred. </p>
<p>&#8220;CUXLDEN For Lite Server&#8221;, has a great capability of distribution with one single computer with Internet connection through peer-to-peer network. Compared to existing client-server based file distribution method that require dozens of ftp/http servers and incurs high cost, this product is economically and functionally far advanced than client-server based.</p>
<p>VERY COOL! </p>
<p>With this program, Who need file hosting now???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 06:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I could never see why there&#039;s so much debate about what separates &quot;legitimate marketing / advertising&quot; from spam.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In any legitimate promotional campaign, the advertiser PAYS!&#8230; not only the production process, but also for the RESOURCES that are being used to spread the message.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any promotion spread by stealing a resource that someone else is paying for is spam.  It&#039;s not Rocket Science.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I, for one, am not paying my ISP in order to provide everyone in The Great Marketing Machine a way to get their messages to me.  I&#039;m paying to access the internet, for MY PURPOSES, using MY COMPUTER.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t appreciate all the interference all this &quot;marketing activity&quot; places on all MY resources!!&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;E-mail is endangered.  Antivirus, Firewall, and Malware Detection softwares must always be running.  Uninvited pop-ups and Flash pop-over banner ads have become &quot;standard rigging&quot; for too many websites.  Search engine results are becoming more useless all the time, as everyone now exploits the process.  Chat venues are being abused.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And, of course, we have bogus P2P files, placed by &quot;marketers&quot;, helping to render P2P less functional.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This practice should be just as unacceptable (and illegal) as planting a virus in an e-mail, or installing malware to those who connect with your webpage.  Many of these P2P files contain the same things.  This activity will be outlawed, in time, because of this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not enough that ISPs and their users said &quot;no&quot; to marketing right from the beginning.  Marketers had to resort to deception, trickery and employ underhanded hackers to further their efforts to continue to exploit the Internet and its &quot;free&quot; resources, for their own interests.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The way I see it, marketers will not be happy until they&#039;ve successfully become the most hated people on earth, or until they&#039;ve successfully killed the Internet&#039;s functionality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Outside the Virtual World, it is considered &quot;harassment&quot; to pursue anyone for anything, after being given a &quot;no&quot; the first time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Internet shouldn&#039;t be any different.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could never see why there&#8217;s so much debate about what separates &#8220;legitimate marketing / advertising&#8221; from spam.</p>
<p>In any legitimate promotional campaign, the advertiser PAYS!&#8230; not only the production process, but also for the RESOURCES that are being used to spread the message.</p>
<p>Any promotion spread by stealing a resource that someone else is paying for is spam.  It&#8217;s not Rocket Science.</p>
<p>I, for one, am not paying my ISP in order to provide everyone in The Great Marketing Machine a way to get their messages to me.  I&#8217;m paying to access the internet, for MY PURPOSES, using MY COMPUTER.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t appreciate all the interference all this &#8220;marketing activity&#8221; places on all MY resources!!&#8230;</p>
<p>E-mail is endangered.  Antivirus, Firewall, and Malware Detection softwares must always be running.  Uninvited pop-ups and Flash pop-over banner ads have become &#8220;standard rigging&#8221; for too many websites.  Search engine results are becoming more useless all the time, as everyone now exploits the process.  Chat venues are being abused.</p>
<p>And, of course, we have bogus P2P files, placed by &#8220;marketers&#8221;, helping to render P2P less functional.</p>
<p>This practice should be just as unacceptable (and illegal) as planting a virus in an e-mail, or installing malware to those who connect with your webpage.  Many of these P2P files contain the same things.  This activity will be outlawed, in time, because of this.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not enough that ISPs and their users said &#8220;no&#8221; to marketing right from the beginning.  Marketers had to resort to deception, trickery and employ underhanded hackers to further their efforts to continue to exploit the Internet and its &#8220;free&#8221; resources, for their own interests.</p>
<p>The way I see it, marketers will not be happy until they&#8217;ve successfully become the most hated people on earth, or until they&#8217;ve successfully killed the Internet&#8217;s functionality.</p>
<p>Outside the Virtual World, it is considered &#8220;harassment&#8221; to pursue anyone for anything, after being given a &#8220;no&#8221; the first time.</p>
<p>The Internet shouldn&#8217;t be any different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;you should get your facts straight before you make bullshit claims like this.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you should get your facts straight before you make bullshit claims like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; P2P advertising or just more spam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM &#187; P2P advertising or just more spam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[&#8230;] not the only company that is polluting P2P networks. Continue reading.   No comments Share/Send  Sphere Topic: Asides Tags: P2P, OnlineAdvertising [&#8230;]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] not the only company that is polluting P2P networks. Continue reading.   No comments Share/Send  Sphere Topic: Asides Tags: P2P, OnlineAdvertising [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko Roettgers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Chris, I&#039;d love to hear more about the inner workings of your product some time, but everything I could gather so far hasn&#039;t really convinced me that P2P users will be presented with a clear distinction between content and advertising. E.g. calling something an &quot;ad bar&quot; just because it happens to be grouped together in a certain situation doesn&#039;t cut it for me. Users just have to sort their search results by different criteria to have your ad bar files all over the place &#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I&#8217;d love to hear more about the inner workings of your product some time, but everything I could gather so far hasn&#8217;t really convinced me that P2P users will be presented with a clear distinction between content and advertising. E.g. calling something an &#8220;ad bar&#8221; just because it happens to be grouped together in a certain situation doesn&#8217;t cut it for me. Users just have to sort their search results by different criteria to have your ad bar files all over the place &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris redlitz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris redlitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Janko:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Skyrider&#039;s first product focused on search marketing into P2P networks. We approached this very similarly to how Google and Yahoo approach Web search marketing. We delineate &quot;sponsored links&quot; and clearly identify the offer and target the searches based on relevant keywords or offers that are appropriate to the younger male demographic. Our goal is not to spoof or spam, but present appropriate marketing messages to this global audience. Skyrider is a technology based company with our original heritage in anti piracy products. In all of our future product implementation, we intend to present discovery and relevancy the P2P environment. We realize that there are many forms of spam, spyware and
fake files, but as P2P becomes more organized, utilizing the power of the decentralized architecture, significant business opportunities and user benefit will arise.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janko:</p>
<p>Skyrider&#8217;s first product focused on search marketing into P2P networks. We approached this very similarly to how Google and Yahoo approach Web search marketing. We delineate &#8220;sponsored links&#8221; and clearly identify the offer and target the searches based on relevant keywords or offers that are appropriate to the younger male demographic. Our goal is not to spoof or spam, but present appropriate marketing messages to this global audience. Skyrider is a technology based company with our original heritage in anti piracy products. In all of our future product implementation, we intend to present discovery and relevancy the P2P environment. We realize that there are many forms of spam, spyware and<br />
fake files, but as P2P becomes more organized, utilizing the power of the decentralized architecture, significant business opportunities and user benefit will arise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DKT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/01/25/p2p-advertising-just-more-spam/#comment-443550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Spam all but killed Usenet as a discusssion medium. It remains to be seen if spam will also destroy P2P networks. Currently, the fake files released by the anti-P2P companies like MediaSentry seem to be more common than spamfiles or spyware-installing trojans.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam all but killed Usenet as a discusssion medium. It remains to be seen if spam will also destroy P2P networks. Currently, the fake files released by the anti-P2P companies like MediaSentry seem to be more common than spamfiles or spyware-installing trojans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

