<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Punitive Damages in Viacom v. YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/no-punitive-damages-in-viacom-v-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/no-punitive-damages-in-viacom-v-youtube/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hd-productions.biz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/no-punitive-damages-in-viacom-v-youtube/#comment-455777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hd-productions.biz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=3414#comment-455777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Viacom could be seen to be suing the site that feeds its addional viewers.  What about the Youtube 
and the fact that if an uploader claims they have permission and are not infringing copyright, even when they blatantly are. Under the DCMA Youtube does remove material infringing copyright when asked to do so.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But how many uploading copyright infringers are Viacom planning to sue en masse?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.hd-productions.biz&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viacom could be seen to be suing the site that feeds its addional viewers.  What about the Youtube<br />
and the fact that if an uploader claims they have permission and are not infringing copyright, even when they blatantly are. Under the DCMA Youtube does remove material infringing copyright when asked to do so.</p>
<p>But how many uploading copyright infringers are Viacom planning to sue en masse?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hd-productions.biz" rel="nofollow">http://www.hd-productions.biz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

