<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySpace Pays Up for quarterlife</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:40:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-602617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/09/12/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-602617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;She wrote that the episodes were to be cut into web-sized segments — of which there are now 36 — so it’s unclear what the actual price was. Regardless, MySpace emphasized in a release that the creators are retaining all the rights to the series.&quot;
Does that mean all of those 36 episode had been preproduced? Because I have read (http://www.dailybruin.com/index.php/article/2007/11/new-social-network-stem-internet-show) that the producer said they were open to influences of the users - but how can it be when everything had been already produced before the release? Does someone know details about the possibility of influences of the users concerning the story of Quarterlife??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;She wrote that the episodes were to be cut into web-sized segments — of which there are now 36 — so it’s unclear what the actual price was. Regardless, MySpace emphasized in a release that the creators are retaining all the rights to the series.&#8221;<br />
Does that mean all of those 36 episode had been preproduced? Because I have read (<a href="http://www.dailybruin.com/index.php/article/2007/11/new-social-network-stem-internet-show" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailybruin.com/index.php/article/2007/11/new-social-network-stem-internet-show</a>) that the producer said they were open to influences of the users &#8211; but how can it be when everything had been already produced before the release? Does someone know details about the possibility of influences of the users concerning the story of Quarterlife??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Before MySpace Can Be an “Entertainment Portal,” It Needs to Rehaul Video &#171; Klickabletv: digital media news</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Before MySpace Can Be an “Entertainment Portal,” It Needs to Rehaul Video &#171; Klickabletv: digital media news]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/09/12/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] MySpace TV and featured lots of original windowed programming like Prom Queen, lonelygirl15 and quarterlife as well as premium content from partners like Hulu, has reverted to its prior name. It only has one [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MySpace TV and featured lots of original windowed programming like Prom Queen, lonelygirl15 and quarterlife as well as premium content from partners like Hulu, has reverted to its prior name. It only has one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Before MySpace Can Be an &#8220;Entertainment Portal,&#8221; It Needs to Rehaul Video</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Before MySpace Can Be an &#8220;Entertainment Portal,&#8221; It Needs to Rehaul Video]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/09/12/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] MySpace TV and featured lots of original windowed programming like Prom Queen, lonelygirl15 and quarterlife as well as premium content from partners like Hulu, has reverted to its prior name. It only has one [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MySpace TV and featured lots of original windowed programming like Prom Queen, lonelygirl15 and quarterlife as well as premium content from partners like Hulu, has reverted to its prior name. It only has one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karina&#8217;s Capsule: quarterlife &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karina&#8217;s Capsule: quarterlife &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/09/12/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] but the first thing that struck me as being a little off the mark about the first episode of quarterlife is the guiding assumption that videoblogging and writing are interchangeable, that speaking into a [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but the first thing that struck me as being a little off the mark about the first episode of quarterlife is the guiding assumption that videoblogging and writing are interchangeable, that speaking into a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySpace Gets in Bed with Roommates &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MySpace Gets in Bed with Roommates &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/09/12/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] MySpace thought quarterlife, another series it&#8217;s paying to show online, was too [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MySpace thought quarterlife, another series it&#8217;s paying to show online, was too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NTV in LA: Looming Strike Yields Toxic Slug-Fest &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NTV in LA: Looming Strike Yields Toxic Slug-Fest &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/09/12/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a web show be from the team behind The Wire? And I&#8217;m excited at what the TV pros manning quarterlife could [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a web show be from the team behind The Wire? And I&#8217;m excited at what the TV pros manning quarterlife could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Schoneveld</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Schoneveld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/09/12/myspace-pays-up-for-quarterlife/#comment-450169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading this post reminds me of the discussion I just started on the Yahoo! Videoblogging Group about legal issues (licensing, sponsorships, etc) for independent creators.  Sure, guys with long television track records and big agents know how to do it, but how do we?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/64571&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Come join the discussion&lt;/a&gt;.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this post reminds me of the discussion I just started on the Yahoo! Videoblogging Group about legal issues (licensing, sponsorships, etc) for independent creators.  Sure, guys with long television track records and big agents know how to do it, but how do we?  <a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/64571" rel="nofollow">Come join the discussion</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

