<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Gives $100K for Open Video Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Buys On2, Now Controls VP6 Codec</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/#comment-467442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Buys On2, Now Controls VP6 Codec]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=16891#comment-467442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] back into power. The open source video compression format of choice, OGG Theora, which is being pushed by Mozilla, has not won industry-wide confidence, so it could be that Google is trying to substitute another [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back into power. The open source video compression format of choice, OGG Theora, which is being pushed by Mozilla, has not won industry-wide confidence, so it could be that Google is trying to substitute another [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Video Welcomes Video Into the Browser</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/#comment-467441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open Video Welcomes Video Into the Browser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=16891#comment-467441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] no consensus on what the leading open video codec will be. Firefox has thrown its weight and $100,000 in funding towards the OGG container format and Theora video encoding, and is also working to adapt OGG for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no consensus on what the leading open video codec will be. Firefox has thrown its weight and $100,000 in funding towards the OGG container format and Theora video encoding, and is also working to adapt OGG for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-02-03 &#124; I&#8217;ve Said Too Much</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/#comment-467440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2009-02-03 &#124; I&#8217;ve Said Too Much]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=16891#comment-467440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Mozilla Gives $100K for Open Video Development « NewTeeVee &quot;Although videos are available on the web via sites like youtube [sic], they don’t share the same democratized characteristics that have made the web vibrant and distributed. And it shows. That centralization has created some interesting problems that have symptoms like censorship via abuse of the DMCA and an overly-concentrated audience on a few sites that have the resources and technology to host video. I believe that problems like the ones we see with youtube are a symptom of the larger problem of the lack of decentralization and competition in video technology - very different than where the rest of the web is today.&quot; (tags: video mozilla)      This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009 at 4:03 pm . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozilla Gives $100K for Open Video Development « NewTeeVee &quot;Although videos are available on the web via sites like youtube [sic], they don’t share the same democratized characteristics that have made the web vibrant and distributed. And it shows. That centralization has created some interesting problems that have symptoms like censorship via abuse of the DMCA and an overly-concentrated audience on a few sites that have the resources and technology to host video. I believe that problems like the ones we see with youtube are a symptom of the larger problem of the lack of decentralization and competition in video technology &#8211; very different than where the rest of the web is today.&quot; (tags: video mozilla)      This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009 at 4:03 pm . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadblog &#187; links for 2009-02-03</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/#comment-467439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dadblog &#187; links for 2009-02-03]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=16891#comment-467439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Mozilla Gives $100K for Open Video Development « NewTeeVee &quot;Although videos are available on the web via sites like youtube [sic], they don’t share the same democratized characteristics that have made the web vibrant and distributed. And it shows. That centralization has created some interesting problems that have symptoms like censorship via abuse of the DMCA and an overly-concentrated audience on a few sites that have the resources and technology to host video. I believe that problems like the ones we see with youtube are a symptom of the larger problem of the lack of decentralization and competition in video technology - very different than where the rest of the web is today.&quot; (tags: video mozilla) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozilla Gives $100K for Open Video Development « NewTeeVee &quot;Although videos are available on the web via sites like youtube [sic], they don’t share the same democratized characteristics that have made the web vibrant and distributed. And it shows. That centralization has created some interesting problems that have symptoms like censorship via abuse of the DMCA and an overly-concentrated audience on a few sites that have the resources and technology to host video. I believe that problems like the ones we see with youtube are a symptom of the larger problem of the lack of decentralization and competition in video technology &#8211; very different than where the rest of the web is today.&quot; (tags: video mozilla) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web video chat &#124; Video Web Hosting</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/#comment-467438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web video chat &#124; Video Web Hosting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=16891#comment-467438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Mozilla is looking to make video on the web as open and as easy to enjoy as images are now, by eliminating the need for software plug-ins or expensive licensing fees for restricted codecs. To further that mission, Mozilla selected the free and open Video Web Hosting News  [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozilla is looking to make video on the web as open and as easy to enjoy as images are now, by eliminating the need for software plug-ins or expensive licensing fees for restricted codecs. To further that mission, Mozilla selected the free and open Video Web Hosting News  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Albrecht</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/#comment-467437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Albrecht]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=16891#comment-467437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally, I would love to not have to deal with a patchwork of plug-ins from around the web to watch video (if it&#039;s tough for me to keep up, I can only imagine the confusion for my mom).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But will this dislodge Flash? No. Dominance tends to perpetuate itself. But Firefox has 20 percent market share now. That&#039;s not ubiquity, but that&#039;s sizable base of people which, in conjunction with the lower cost of using it, could encourage more people post with Theora.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The $100K from Mozilla just shows that its committed to the format.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Om,</p>
<p>Personally, I would love to not have to deal with a patchwork of plug-ins from around the web to watch video (if it&#8217;s tough for me to keep up, I can only imagine the confusion for my mom).</p>
<p>But will this dislodge Flash? No. Dominance tends to perpetuate itself. But Firefox has 20 percent market share now. That&#8217;s not ubiquity, but that&#8217;s sizable base of people which, in conjunction with the lower cost of using it, could encourage more people post with Theora.</p>
<p>The $100K from Mozilla just shows that its committed to the format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neno Brown</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/#comment-467436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neno Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=16891#comment-467436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I am pleased that there are organisations like MoZilla and the people at Ogg, championing Open source Codecs; gives the start-up a chance to save costs on delivering video.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sad that the mpegLA people put taxes on sight and sound, the economic downturn might hopefully align manufacturers and web video to this non-tax media medium.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Though Voribis is better than mp3, Theora could do with some tech help to deal with HD content, but there is always Dirac coming through the ranks to challenge H264.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pleased that there are organisations like MoZilla and the people at Ogg, championing Open source Codecs; gives the start-up a chance to save costs on delivering video.</p>
<p>Sad that the mpegLA people put taxes on sight and sound, the economic downturn might hopefully align manufacturers and web video to this non-tax media medium.</p>
<p>Though Voribis is better than mp3, Theora could do with some tech help to deal with HD content, but there is always Dirac coming through the ranks to challenge H264.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/mozilla-gives-100k-for-open-video-development/#comment-467435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=16891#comment-467435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Chris&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why do you think this is going to work out? There have been many attempts at open source audio and video and they never got traction. Why do yo think it is going to work this time around. Any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p>
<p>Why do you think this is going to work out? There have been many attempts at open source audio and video and they never got traction. Why do yo think it is going to work this time around. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

