<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How How It Should Have Ended Should Go in the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/how-how-it-should-have-ended-should-go-in-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/how-how-it-should-have-ended-should-go-in-the-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jensen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/how-how-it-should-have-ended-should-go-in-the-future/#comment-477519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Jensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=34481#comment-477519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;A lot of the problem is that they do to their clips what they complain the movies do.  They stretch their meager bit of material to two minutes.  The Lords of the Ring spoof could have been done in fifteen seconds and been even funnier ... and more made its point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And practically all (I&#039;d say all but I haven&#039;t seen all of their spoofs) are mainly about how to shorten a movie.  While their point is usually valid, they ignore the little thing called &quot;character development&quot;.  In other words, their humor is shallow.  They&#039;re like the nerd you know that points out technical problems with movies while missing the point that it is the drama that we really enjoyed.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of the problem is that they do to their clips what they complain the movies do.  They stretch their meager bit of material to two minutes.  The Lords of the Ring spoof could have been done in fifteen seconds and been even funnier &#8230; and more made its point.</p>
<p>And practically all (I&#8217;d say all but I haven&#8217;t seen all of their spoofs) are mainly about how to shorten a movie.  While their point is usually valid, they ignore the little thing called &#8220;character development&#8221;.  In other words, their humor is shallow.  They&#8217;re like the nerd you know that points out technical problems with movies while missing the point that it is the drama that we really enjoyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

