<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Net Neutrality Flap: Think HD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/googles-net-neutrality-flap-think-hd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/googles-net-neutrality-flap-think-hd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: krae_on</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/googles-net-neutrality-flap-think-hd/#comment-465965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[krae_on]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=14193#comment-465965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;this all makes sense in a world where we are stifled by internet speeds when it comes to watching our youtube videos in HD.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in actuality, even for premium HD content i don&#039;t have to wait for buffering or anything, because internet technology is such that even with the overly complex wiring of the net i am still getting more speed than i can use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;a rewiring isn&#039;t needed, and simply opens the web up to exploitation from large companies.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this all makes sense in a world where we are stifled by internet speeds when it comes to watching our youtube videos in HD.</p>
<p>in actuality, even for premium HD content i don&#8217;t have to wait for buffering or anything, because internet technology is such that even with the overly complex wiring of the net i am still getting more speed than i can use.</p>
<p>a rewiring isn&#8217;t needed, and simply opens the web up to exploitation from large companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Page</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/googles-net-neutrality-flap-think-hd/#comment-465964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neal Page]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=14193#comment-465964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I miss the connection to net neutrality, but what Chris brings out is a key point.  The infrastructure required to deliver tons of video, and particlarly HD, is essential for successful delivery of content to make the net a viable, reliable distribution channel for high-qualaity video that people will watch.  YouTube has the experience of high volumes of crappy UGC, and this requiers a lot of uumph under the hood.  Now add solid a killer network infrastructure, better encoding to get HD to 2Mb, and arrays of automated transcoding capabilities the game changes.  Drop in professional content and connections to TVs, and you have a full-on broadcast network infrastructure completly bypassing traditional b-cast networks.  Chris is paying attention to an overlooked but critical component of the next-gen internet, and that is the infrastructure required for quality streaming.  We discuss these and other related topics at www.inlethd.com&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss the connection to net neutrality, but what Chris brings out is a key point.  The infrastructure required to deliver tons of video, and particlarly HD, is essential for successful delivery of content to make the net a viable, reliable distribution channel for high-qualaity video that people will watch.  YouTube has the experience of high volumes of crappy UGC, and this requiers a lot of uumph under the hood.  Now add solid a killer network infrastructure, better encoding to get HD to 2Mb, and arrays of automated transcoding capabilities the game changes.  Drop in professional content and connections to TVs, and you have a full-on broadcast network infrastructure completly bypassing traditional b-cast networks.  Chris is paying attention to an overlooked but critical component of the next-gen internet, and that is the infrastructure required for quality streaming.  We discuss these and other related topics at <a href="http://www.inlethd.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.inlethd.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neno Brown</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/googles-net-neutrality-flap-think-hd/#comment-465963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neno Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=14193#comment-465963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Googles cache move solodify&#039;s a monopoloy on VOD,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If this service was open to all players in the VOD game then good but it is&#039;nt; so we have a world dominated by the usual traditional broadcast parasitic behaviour of owning content creators copyrights and restrictions to boot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google has their dominance in the VOD field because they forged that path, the same path anyone can take, only if they cut deals with ISP&#039;s for google edge cache servers, then they effectivly control web tv.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not everyone can laydown the financial weight to achieve this, effectivly google hands power to the ISP to monetize the start-ups in the VOD field further creating barriers to entry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These barriers should not effect mankind who need to advance through knowledge and creativity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If google does this, they become a hybrid-Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googles cache move solodify&#8217;s a monopoloy on VOD,</p>
<p>If this service was open to all players in the VOD game then good but it is&#8217;nt; so we have a world dominated by the usual traditional broadcast parasitic behaviour of owning content creators copyrights and restrictions to boot.</p>
<p>Google has their dominance in the VOD field because they forged that path, the same path anyone can take, only if they cut deals with ISP&#8217;s for google edge cache servers, then they effectivly control web tv.</p>
<p>Not everyone can laydown the financial weight to achieve this, effectivly google hands power to the ISP to monetize the start-ups in the VOD field further creating barriers to entry.</p>
<p>These barriers should not effect mankind who need to advance through knowledge and creativity.</p>
<p>If google does this, they become a hybrid-Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neuromancer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/googles-net-neutrality-flap-think-hd/#comment-465962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neuromancer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=14193#comment-465962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;deploying a cdn has nothing to do with the network nutrality issue&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deploying a cdn has nothing to do with the network nutrality issue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

