<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sponsor post: Google: YouTube Will Soon Be &#8220;Very Profitable&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Shows Thin Skin, Pushes Back on Criticism &#124; AniChaos.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Shows Thin Skin, Pushes Back on Criticism &#124; AniChaos.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] on earnings calls specifically to address criticism, saying that the only reason they&#8217;d talked about YouTube profitability on past earnings calls was &#8220;because there was so much distortion in the market we just thought it was an OK time to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on earnings calls specifically to address criticism, saying that the only reason they&#8217;d talked about YouTube profitability on past earnings calls was &#8220;because there was so much distortion in the market we just thought it was an OK time to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Shows Thin Skin, Pushes Back on Criticism: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Shows Thin Skin, Pushes Back on Criticism: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] release on earnings calls specifically to address criticism, saying that the only reason they had talked about YouTube profitability on past earnings calls was &#8220;because there was so much distortion in the market we just thought it was an OK time to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] release on earnings calls specifically to address criticism, saying that the only reason they had talked about YouTube profitability on past earnings calls was &#8220;because there was so much distortion in the market we just thought it was an OK time to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Schmidt: Welcome to the &#8220;Age of Augmented Humanity&#8221; &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt: Welcome to the &#8220;Age of Augmented Humanity&#8221; &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] of ubiquity,&#8221; Schmidt said, where greater distribution means more profits. He cited the (loooong-expected) successful monetization of YouTube as an example. &#8220;Augmented humanity&#8221; will introduce [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of ubiquity,&#8221; Schmidt said, where greater distribution means more profits. He cited the (loooong-expected) successful monetization of YouTube as an example. &#8220;Augmented humanity&#8221; will introduce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google: YouTube &#8216;Monetizing Well,&#8217; Helping Partners Make Money</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google: YouTube &#8216;Monetizing Well,&#8217; Helping Partners Make Money]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] ago, on the company&#8217;s second quarter earnings call, Pichette said that the site would be “very profitable” in the “not too distant future,” and the company has been working hard to deliver on that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ago, on the company&#8217;s second quarter earnings call, Pichette said that the site would be “very profitable” in the “not too distant future,” and the company has been working hard to deliver on that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analyst: YouTube Could Turn a Profit in 2010</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Analyst: YouTube Could Turn a Profit in 2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] summer on Google&#8217;s second quarter conference call, Google CFO Patrick Pichette said YouTube would be “very profitable” in the “not too distant [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] summer on Google&#8217;s second quarter conference call, Google CFO Patrick Pichette said YouTube would be “very profitable” in the “not too distant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Monetizing More than 1B Video Views Per Week</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Monetizing More than 1B Video Views Per Week]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] said Google CFO Patrick Pichette on today&#8217;s quarterly earnings call, same as he said last quarter. He did offer a &#8220;sound bite&#8221; to appease investors and industry-watchers: [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said Google CFO Patrick Pichette on today&#8217;s quarterly earnings call, same as he said last quarter. He did offer a &#8220;sound bite&#8221; to appease investors and industry-watchers: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube to (Finally) Monetize Viral Videos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube to (Finally) Monetize Viral Videos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] today only monetizes a sliver of its views, though a Google exec recently said that number had tripled in the past [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today only monetizes a sliver of its views, though a Google exec recently said that number had tripled in the past [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto Web Design</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toronto Web Design]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Why is Google at all having that partner program!! How can Google allow any webmaster monetize a blog with Adsense, and then have to somehow only allow people monetize youtube if they apply to become partners?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Google at all having that partner program!! How can Google allow any webmaster monetize a blog with Adsense, and then have to somehow only allow people monetize youtube if they apply to become partners?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Introduces AdSense-Like Feature</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Introduces AdSense-Like Feature]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] shown on pages where the site has a revenue-sharing partnership with the content producer. YouTube says views of partner videos (and therefore monetized videos) have tripled in the last year, and it is [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shown on pages where the site has a revenue-sharing partnership with the content producer. YouTube says views of partner videos (and therefore monetized videos) have tripled in the last year, and it is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citi Now Agrees YouTube Can Reach Profitability Soon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Citi Now Agrees YouTube Can Reach Profitability Soon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] were vastly overestimated, Citi issued a note saying it agreed. Google CFO Patrick Pichette had said of YouTube on Google&#8217;s latest earnings call &#8220;in the not long, too long distance future, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were vastly overestimated, Citi issued a note saying it agreed. Google CFO Patrick Pichette had said of YouTube on Google&#8217;s latest earnings call &#8220;in the not long, too long distance future, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links der Woche - 20. Juli 2009 - Videopunk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links der Woche - 20. Juli 2009 - Videopunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] YouTube will soon be profitable [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube will soon be profitable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charbax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Once Youtube monetizes all the videos that need to be monetized, it&#039;ll be over 10 Billion views monetized per month.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At $10 CPM, that means $100 Million extra in revenues per month. $10 CPM average is a VERY low estimate. Google can very likely achieve $20 or $30 CPM on high quality videos. And more high quality videos WILL be uploaded and created once more creators are able to monetize their Youtube videos.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And don&#039;t tell me user generated content cannot be monetized. That is just BS. UGC generated less CPM than PRO content, of course, but you cannot say they generate nothing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That would be like saying Adsense for websites doesn&#039;t work for small websites. No it works on all websites. It works just better for websites where visitors tend to buy more stuff and click on more ads. You have ABSOLUTELY NO way to say for sure that the viewer of a User Generated Video has less money to spend on advertisers. In fact, I am pretty sure that people watching UGC on Youtube probably has more money to spend than certain people watching certain brainless Hollywood films.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once Youtube monetizes all the videos that need to be monetized, it&#8217;ll be over 10 Billion views monetized per month.</p>
<p>At $10 CPM, that means $100 Million extra in revenues per month. $10 CPM average is a VERY low estimate. Google can very likely achieve $20 or $30 CPM on high quality videos. And more high quality videos WILL be uploaded and created once more creators are able to monetize their Youtube videos.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t tell me user generated content cannot be monetized. That is just BS. UGC generated less CPM than PRO content, of course, but you cannot say they generate nothing.</p>
<p>That would be like saying Adsense for websites doesn&#8217;t work for small websites. No it works on all websites. It works just better for websites where visitors tend to buy more stuff and click on more ads. You have ABSOLUTELY NO way to say for sure that the viewer of a User Generated Video has less money to spend on advertisers. In fact, I am pretty sure that people watching UGC on Youtube probably has more money to spend than certain people watching certain brainless Hollywood films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charbax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;One obvious way Youtube will monetize more videos, is once they stop their ridiculous restrictions on monetizing Youtube videos:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only citizens of USA, UK, Spain, Japan, Ireland, Germany, France, Canada, Brazil, Australia can yet even APPLY to become Youtube partner, which basically means to be allowed to display advertising on the videos to monetize them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why is Google at all having that partner program!! How can Google allow any webmaster monetize a blog with Adsense, and then have to somehow only allow people monetize youtube if they apply to become partners?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t tell me video copyrights are more serious than any other Adsense website&#039;s copyrights. You can pirate video on Adsense websites just as well. Google has advanced digital and analog fingerprint detection technology for Youtube videos, so they can simply scan uploaded videos through that system before allowing any specific video to be monetized. And just as for Adsense, any copyright abuse would immediately be undone, user can be banned, and all responsability is then put on the user who illegally tried to profit on copyright infringed contents. Also Google has very solid usage data over many years of usage on Youtube and other Google sites, so it makes no sense that Google would not be able to allow a large part of verified &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; users and no reason Google cannot ask, just as for Adsense, that new users need to verify their bank account, verify a credit card, verify a home address and more types of verifications, perhaps even charge a fee to get verified through signed contract that has to be mailed in, scanned passport/ID, SMS verification, whatever. Google should have plenty enough of ways to make sure 100x more videos can be monetized.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One obvious way Youtube will monetize more videos, is once they stop their ridiculous restrictions on monetizing Youtube videos:</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>Only citizens of USA, UK, Spain, Japan, Ireland, Germany, France, Canada, Brazil, Australia can yet even APPLY to become Youtube partner, which basically means to be allowed to display advertising on the videos to monetize them.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Why is Google at all having that partner program!! How can Google allow any webmaster monetize a blog with Adsense, and then have to somehow only allow people monetize youtube if they apply to become partners?</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>Don&#8217;t tell me video copyrights are more serious than any other Adsense website&#8217;s copyrights. You can pirate video on Adsense websites just as well. Google has advanced digital and analog fingerprint detection technology for Youtube videos, so they can simply scan uploaded videos through that system before allowing any specific video to be monetized. And just as for Adsense, any copyright abuse would immediately be undone, user can be banned, and all responsability is then put on the user who illegally tried to profit on copyright infringed contents. Also Google has very solid usage data over many years of usage on Youtube and other Google sites, so it makes no sense that Google would not be able to allow a large part of verified <em>real</em> users and no reason Google cannot ask, just as for Adsense, that new users need to verify their bank account, verify a credit card, verify a home address and more types of verifications, perhaps even charge a fee to get verified through signed contract that has to be mailed in, scanned passport/ID, SMS verification, whatever. Google should have plenty enough of ways to make sure 100x more videos can be monetized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traffic website</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traffic website]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yes I agree with you. I have read about youtube as a powerful online marketing tool, and that true. I have upload a video and .... bingo..... it buzzing my site traffic&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree with you. I have read about youtube as a powerful online marketing tool, and that true. I have upload a video and &#8230;. bingo&#8230;.. it buzzing my site traffic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What to read on the GigaOM network</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What to read on the GigaOM network]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] more open development (OStatic) Smartphones: the ultimate model for greener cars? (Earth2Tech) Google: YouTube will soon be &#8220;very profitable&#8221; (NewTeeVee) Dear Verizon: Please stop disabling GPS in smartphones on your network [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more open development (OStatic) Smartphones: the ultimate model for greener cars? (Earth2Tech) Google: YouTube will soon be &#8220;very profitable&#8221; (NewTeeVee) Dear Verizon: Please stop disabling GPS in smartphones on your network [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timekeeper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/google-youtube-will-soon-be-very-profitable/#comment-474098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timekeeper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=28362#comment-474098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Liz - good article.  It&#039;s amazing at how obtuse Google execs are when they are talking about YouTube revenue.  They are a public company, I&#039;m not sure why no one has held their feet to the flames and asked for a real number.  My position: If it was a good number, they&#039;d say it.  They are hiding YouTubes expenses in Google&#039;s vast profits.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bob - good plug for BBQ Pit Boys - would you be willing to share what those rev numbers are?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TK&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz &#8211; good article.  It&#8217;s amazing at how obtuse Google execs are when they are talking about YouTube revenue.  They are a public company, I&#8217;m not sure why no one has held their feet to the flames and asked for a real number.  My position: If it was a good number, they&#8217;d say it.  They are hiding YouTubes expenses in Google&#8217;s vast profits.</p>
<p>Bob &#8211; good plug for BBQ Pit Boys &#8211; would you be willing to share what those rev numbers are?</p>
<p>TK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

