<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fresh Stats on TV Habits and Video Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/fresh-stats-on-tv-habits-and-video-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/fresh-stats-on-tv-habits-and-video-ads/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:48:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee &#187; Signs Point to Yes for Online Video Revenue</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/fresh-stats-on-tv-habits-and-video-ads/#comment-444113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewTeeVee &#187; Signs Point to Yes for Online Video Revenue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/fresh-stats-on-tv-habits-and-video-ads/#comment-444113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] WRAL-TV site scored the best, with 45.8 percent adult reach and 474,100 monthly visitors. We had previously written about a study showing local TV online revenue was up 41 percent in 2006 to $399 million, though it [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WRAL-TV site scored the best, with 45.8 percent adult reach and 474,100 monthly visitors. We had previously written about a study showing local TV online revenue was up 41 percent in 2006 to $399 million, though it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Gannes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/fresh-stats-on-tv-habits-and-video-ads/#comment-444111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz Gannes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/fresh-stats-on-tv-habits-and-video-ads/#comment-444111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;System failure! Unexpected input!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>System failure! Unexpected input!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/fresh-stats-on-tv-habits-and-video-ads/#comment-444110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/fresh-stats-on-tv-habits-and-video-ads/#comment-444110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;What I&#039;ve never understood about such TV vs Internet studies is why are they mutually exclusive? It&#039;s not like there are that many people who access the internet via their TV. If somebody is sitting on the couch with the laptop on the lap and the TV on, what does that count as?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;ve never understood about such TV vs Internet studies is why are they mutually exclusive? It&#8217;s not like there are that many people who access the internet via their TV. If somebody is sitting on the couch with the laptop on the lap and the TV on, what does that count as?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

