<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes: Google Bought YouTube, Now Trying to Make Money on It!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:02:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet&#8217;s Least-wanted Gig: Online Video CEO</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet&#8217;s Least-wanted Gig: Online Video CEO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to our sources, YouTube will make $70 million to $90 million this year; a friendlier estimate from Forbes is $200 million. And that&#8217;s as Google&#8217;s Eric Schmidt, CEO of a company that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to our sources, YouTube will make $70 million to $90 million this year; a friendlier estimate from Forbes is $200 million. And that&#8217;s as Google&#8217;s Eric Schmidt, CEO of a company that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Go Forbes.....&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Forbes&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: internet marketing product</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[internet marketing product]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Of course, what a great site and informative posts, I will add backlink - bookmark this site? Regards, Reader.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, what a great site and informative posts, I will add backlink &#8211; bookmark this site? Regards, Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Cowbell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les Cowbell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;In the time honored tradition of tweaking someone else&#039;s copy, you write, &quot;YouTube will make $200 million this year&quot; while Forbes writes, &quot;YouTube will generate $200 million this year.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To my ear, &quot;MAKE&quot; implies profit and &quot;GENERATE&quot; implies revenue; make being a reduction of the common phrase &quot;make a profit.&quot; These two terms represent vastly different numbers in the business world. If running with the likes of Forbes, it would behoove you to brush up on financial terms &amp; jargon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Les&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the time honored tradition of tweaking someone else&#8217;s copy, you write, &#8220;YouTube will make $200 million this year&#8221; while Forbes writes, &#8220;YouTube will generate $200 million this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>To my ear, &#8220;MAKE&#8221; implies profit and &#8220;GENERATE&#8221; implies revenue; make being a reduction of the common phrase &#8220;make a profit.&#8221; These two terms represent vastly different numbers in the business world. If running with the likes of Forbes, it would behoove you to brush up on financial terms &amp; jargon.</p>
<p>Les</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jame</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jame]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;oooooooo!!
it&#039;s great news&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oooooooo!!<br />
it&#8217;s great news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stc</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Charbax&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Advertisers pay a $15CPM for overlay + banners on Youtube not Google.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charbax</p>
<p>Advertisers pay a $15CPM for overlay + banners on Youtube not Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Abundo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Abundo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 07:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;No shit, Forbes. :P&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No shit, Forbes. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charbax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;When is Google launching video adsense overlay for all Youtube publishers, not limited only to US and UK publishers that are approved and have over 1 million views per month. Just as normal adsense is open to any website publisher, so should it be for Youtube publishers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve heard Google would pay up to $15 per 1000 views for displaying those overlay advertisments. If that is true, that will completely revolutionnize TV. When Google activates that feature, it will be the end of the traditionnal established TV stations, cause the quality of independent Youtube content will dramatically increase very rapidly. That will create a market for thousands of independent video-bloggers, independent film makers and independent video reporters.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is Google launching video adsense overlay for all Youtube publishers, not limited only to US and UK publishers that are approved and have over 1 million views per month. Just as normal adsense is open to any website publisher, so should it be for Youtube publishers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard Google would pay up to $15 per 1000 views for displaying those overlay advertisments. If that is true, that will completely revolutionnize TV. When Google activates that feature, it will be the end of the traditionnal established TV stations, cause the quality of independent Youtube content will dramatically increase very rapidly. That will create a market for thousands of independent video-bloggers, independent film makers and independent video reporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Street</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/forbes-google-bought-youtube-now-trying-to-make-money-on-it/#comment-458735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4206#comment-458735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Come on Liz, we love it when you are catty.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is great news! Online videos cost money and advertising on them costs more than previously estimated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like the sound of that. Now if you can tell me the price of electric cars are coming down.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Liz, we love it when you are catty.</p>
<p>This is great news! Online videos cost money and advertising on them costs more than previously estimated.</p>
<p>I like the sound of that. Now if you can tell me the price of electric cars are coming down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

