Comments on: Fooling YouTube Audio Fingerprints: Speed Works, Volume Doesn’t, and All That Matters Is the First 30 Seconds http://gigaom.com/video/fooling-youtube-audio-fingerprints-speed-works-volume-doesnt-and-all-that-matters-is-the-first-30-seconds/ Sat, 26 May 2012 02:44:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Mircea http://gigaom.com/video/fooling-youtube-audio-fingerprints-speed-works-volume-doesnt-and-all-that-matters-is-the-first-30-seconds/#comment-471269 Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:04:26 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=23404#comment-471269 I don’t believe there’s any way under today’s technology to have such a system actually working accurately. It will likely cause tons of mismatches until 20 years from now whenever anything that sounds like a song is identified. Another step back for Youtube and more issues for those who use it.

And even if it was correctly functional such a system is something shameful, and only encourages more online oppression because some content owners have the false hope it would help them in some way. Shame watching everything regress when it could get better…

]]> By: Chris http://gigaom.com/video/fooling-youtube-audio-fingerprints-speed-works-volume-doesnt-and-all-that-matters-is-the-first-30-seconds/#comment-471268 Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:17:22 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=23404#comment-471268 It’s a good idea. But if a song is resampled 5% down, won’t it sound odd or won’t the listener notice that?
Your exsample sounds so deep or is the original the same?

]]>