<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eBaum&#8217;s World Finds a Buyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long eBaum&#8217;s World Saga Comes to a Close with Layoffs &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Long eBaum&#8217;s World Saga Comes to a Close with Layoffs &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/02/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Entertainment/ZVUE, a maker of media players and a conglomeration of various web sites, bought eBaum&#8217;s World for $15 million in cash, $2.5 million in stock and a potential earn-out of $50 [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Entertainment/ZVUE, a maker of media players and a conglomeration of various web sites, bought eBaum&#8217;s World for $15 million in cash, $2.5 million in stock and a potential earn-out of $50 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Public Markets: No Place for Online Video &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Public Markets: No Place for Online Video &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/02/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The holding company runs a variety of online entertainment sites, including eBaum&#8217;s World (our story on its $15 million-plus-earnouts acquisition) and Putfile (our story on its $7.1 million [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The holding company runs a variety of online entertainment sites, including eBaum&#8217;s World (our story on its $15 million-plus-earnouts acquisition) and Putfile (our story on its $7.1 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/02/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Liz,

To add to what Mary said, HandHeld Entertainment sources Google Analytics on the news release that went out about the announcement. That&#039;s where the PR guy (since it was me) got the information he sent you.

We agree, the discrepancies are confusing at best, but as Mary said, Google Analytics attached directly to the site is the most accurate tool to gauge traffic on the Web site.

Jon
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Liz,</p>
<p>To add to what Mary said, HandHeld Entertainment sources Google Analytics on the news release that went out about the announcement. That&#8217;s where the PR guy (since it was me) got the information he sent you.</p>
<p>We agree, the discrepancies are confusing at best, but as Mary said, Google Analytics attached directly to the site is the most accurate tool to gauge traffic on the Web site.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Gannes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz Gannes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/02/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s really interesting, Mary. But I wish there could be one truth.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really interesting, Mary. But I wish there could be one truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary hodder</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mary hodder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/02/ebaums-world-finds-a-buyer/#comment-449064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Liz,
Actually I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if both numbers were &quot;true&quot;.  The problem with comScore is that they are estimating based on what piece of the internet they &quot;see&quot; as is Alexa or Compete.

The only way I think to really know, without coding up a massive system to weed out bot traffic and &quot;page views&quot; is to use Google Analytics.  And the data there is private to the site owner.

Our numbers from them are much better than any of the three public stats, because they only see a part, but we talk about the public numbers with people because they can see those and they can&#039;t see Google Analytics.

Flawed as they are, we find Alexa to be closest to what is real right now on a day to day basis.

mary
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Liz,<br />
Actually I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if both numbers were &#8220;true&#8221;.  The problem with comScore is that they are estimating based on what piece of the internet they &#8220;see&#8221; as is Alexa or Compete.</p>
<p>The only way I think to really know, without coding up a massive system to weed out bot traffic and &#8220;page views&#8221; is to use Google Analytics.  And the data there is private to the site owner.</p>
<p>Our numbers from them are much better than any of the three public stats, because they only see a part, but we talk about the public numbers with people because they can see those and they can&#8217;t see Google Analytics.</p>
<p>Flawed as they are, we find Alexa to be closest to what is real right now on a day to day basis.</p>
<p>mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

