<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Consumers Really Want to Pay for Media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/do-consumers-really-want-to-pay-for-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/do-consumers-really-want-to-pay-for-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wolf</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/do-consumers-really-want-to-pay-for-media/#comment-475081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Wolf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=29709#comment-475081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think you both have valid points, but addressed at specific distribution mediums - the Internet distribution model for content, across any type be it news, video, music, is still being shaped for pure ad-supported. There is no doubt while viewership is going up, the economics of Internet ad-support distribution is making is challenging, particularly for news services who have traditionally be ad supported.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Those electronic mediums such as broadcast TV and radio continue to be successful using primarily ad-supported (though most of these broadcasters today get a health revenue stream through cable and satellite fees), but even these firms are grappling with how ad-supported content in a broadcast world will do in the world of over-the-top distribution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great conversation and points!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you both have valid points, but addressed at specific distribution mediums &#8211; the Internet distribution model for content, across any type be it news, video, music, is still being shaped for pure ad-supported. There is no doubt while viewership is going up, the economics of Internet ad-support distribution is making is challenging, particularly for news services who have traditionally be ad supported.</p>
<p>Those electronic mediums such as broadcast TV and radio continue to be successful using primarily ad-supported (though most of these broadcasters today get a health revenue stream through cable and satellite fees), but even these firms are grappling with how ad-supported content in a broadcast world will do in the world of over-the-top distribution.</p>
<p>Great conversation and points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jensen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/do-consumers-really-want-to-pay-for-media/#comment-475080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Jensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=29709#comment-475080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;SimpleRobb,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A broken model?  That is the business model of broadcast television and radio.  It is anything but broken.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SimpleRobb,</p>
<p>A broken model?  That is the business model of broadcast television and radio.  It is anything but broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SIMPLEROBB.COM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/do-consumers-really-want-to-pay-for-media/#comment-475079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SIMPLEROBB.COM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=29709#comment-475079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;SJ. The idea of &quot;giving&quot; away content and recouping expenses (and gain some profit) off advertising alone is a broken, broken model.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJ. The idea of &#8220;giving&#8221; away content and recouping expenses (and gain some profit) off advertising alone is a broken, broken model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do Consumers Really Want Their Media in a Bundle?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/do-consumers-really-want-to-pay-for-media/#comment-475078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Do Consumers Really Want Their Media in a Bundle?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=29709#comment-475078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] prefer to pick a bundle rather than buy à la carte, Daniel Taylor, a GigaOM Pro analyst, argues over at NewTeeVee. To bolster his argument, he used the example of paying for cable, rather than individual channels [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] prefer to pick a bundle rather than buy à la carte, Daniel Taylor, a GigaOM Pro analyst, argues over at NewTeeVee. To bolster his argument, he used the example of paying for cable, rather than individual channels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jensen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/do-consumers-really-want-to-pay-for-media/#comment-475077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Jensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=29709#comment-475077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Of course, the alternative is content providers giving away their stuff for free and making their profits off of corporate sponsors (how TV was funded during its &quot;Golden Age&quot;), product placement advertising, etc..  Click on my name for a white paper I did in 2003 that&#039;s titled &quot;P2P Revolution: peer-to-peer networking and the entertainment industry&quot;.  I think it is still valid in its main points.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the alternative is content providers giving away their stuff for free and making their profits off of corporate sponsors (how TV was funded during its &#8220;Golden Age&#8221;), product placement advertising, etc..  Click on my name for a white paper I did in 2003 that&#8217;s titled &#8220;P2P Revolution: peer-to-peer networking and the entertainment industry&#8221;.  I think it is still valid in its main points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

