Comments on: Did Murdoch just KO Google? http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/ Fri, 25 May 2012 22:52:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: thinks » Blog Archive » Did News Corp. kill the video star? http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445343 Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:03:09 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445343 [...] at NewTeeVee has an interesting post discussing why the News Corp./NBC joint venture is going to put GooTube on the ropes. Robert is not, alas, the late star of Marcus Welby and Father Knows Best, but the irony of a [...]

]]> By: » Google vs. MySpace: Is YouTube doomed? | Digital Markets | ZDNet.com http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445342 Tue, 22 May 2007 22:36:53 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445342 [...] not: “Did Murdoch just KO Google?” Robert Young [...]

]]> By: What if Redstone “Googled” Murdoch? » Publishing 2.0 http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445340 Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:45:18 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445340 [...] is the greatest platform for efficient allocation of attention in the history of media. But its text-based algorithms break down for video content. What Google lacks for the first time, in this new video space, is content. Unlike text content, [...]

]]> By: GigaOM » What if Redstone ‘Googled’ Murdoch? http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445341 Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:00:28 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445341 [...] is the greatest platform for efficient allocation of attention in the history of media. But its text-based algorithms break down for video content. What Google lacks for the first time, in this new video space, is content. Unlike text content, [...]

]]> By: Dave Liu dot com / musings from the edge » Articles of the Day http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445339 Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:38:36 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445339 [...] Google Won’t Dominate Video Like Text – There’s no guarantee Google will continue its domination of the Internet. A search leader’s success comes down to PageRank and AdWords, a pair of technologies built on text. Searchable, advertizable video represents the next Internet land grab, which means Google is in trouble if it can’t translate its text success to moving images. Why? Because with video, Google has to deal with content owners and strike licensing deals and agreements, something that big media firms are reluctant to do with a company clearly so bent on Web-wide domination. [...]

]]> By: Visible.Mobi http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445338 Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:35:50 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445338 Whoever comes up with a technology to search VIDEO has a lot of gain…

]]> By: chrisco http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445337 Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:50:30 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445337 Here’s my take: Most people are having a field day pissing on this whole “big media” collaboration. That means expectations are low. That means an upside surprise is easier. My money’s on an upside surprise. Big time. Thoughts / comments?

Cheers,
chrisco

PS: I wonder what they’re going to name this thing when it comes out? If you were “big media” what would you call your video site? StupidMadeUpNameThatNoboyCanRemember.com? I don’t think so. In fact, I think they’d get maximum impact by taking a big slap at all the stupid Web 2.0 names that are so prevalent now that they’re a joke. I mean everybody and their dog has had their turn at that crap it’s stupid (and boring and annoying). I say what would stand out is a clean, simple and descriptive name. I mean in a land where everyone is using stupid made up names the way to stand out is with the opposite of that. I.e. if you are going to have a site showing big media video, why not call it what it is. Everyone will remember the name and know what’s there: Big Media Video. I.e. BigMediaVideo.com. Seems like a “duh” to me. http://www.bigmediavideo.com

]]> By: infinite dreams (alpha) » Did Murdoch just KO Google? http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445330 Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:03:07 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445330 [...] een mooi artikel op NewTeeVee wordt uitgelegd waarom Murdoch alle grote TV networks tot samenwerking aanspoort. Zo’n [...]

]]> By: Jack Roberts http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445324 Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:14:43 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445324 To label Google as strictly a text based search engine is quite misleading. Google co-owns and majority controls You Tube. Google is using new sets of server decks with video image sorting capabilties that has Google way out in front of any competitors and leading the charge to power video search for years to come.

]]> By: Rupert's Master Plan « VCMike’s Blog http://gigaom.com/video/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445335 Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:04:17 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/did-murdoch-just-ko-google/#comment-445335 [...] Master Plan Jump to Comments Robert Young has a good post today on NewTeeVee on the Newscorp/NBC YouTube [...]

]]>