<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cablevision: Heck Yeah, We&#8217;re Doing Network DVRs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/cablevision-heck-yeah-were-doing-network-dvrs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/cablevision-heck-yeah-were-doing-network-dvrs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: taco</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/cablevision-heck-yeah-were-doing-network-dvrs/#comment-462735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[taco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=8365#comment-462735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Any recent news about Cablevision&#039;s network DVR? Has Dept. of Justice ruled on it? Also, I just read that Cablevision in Bermuda (not related) is using Scientific Atlanta&#039;s new machine for multi-room DVR - I know FiOS offers this and would love if CV would offer.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any recent news about Cablevision&#8217;s network DVR? Has Dept. of Justice ruled on it? Also, I just read that Cablevision in Bermuda (not related) is using Scientific Atlanta&#8217;s new machine for multi-room DVR &#8211; I know FiOS offers this and would love if CV would offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david1m</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/cablevision-heck-yeah-were-doing-network-dvrs/#comment-462734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david1m]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=8365#comment-462734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;well now cabel vision, and verizon are having huge competition for tipple package including FREE HD channels from FiOS.  well hope everone is aware of feb 17th all tv will be going digital.  so if still have old tv, then it&#039;s time to upgrade your tv. sugget buy new hd tv or get converter box from cable vision, or verizon with their package or buy the converter box from online.  if you want the converter check out this site... http://www.newcomputergen.com/get-dtv.aspx&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well now cabel vision, and verizon are having huge competition for tipple package including FREE HD channels from FiOS.  well hope everone is aware of feb 17th all tv will be going digital.  so if still have old tv, then it&#8217;s time to upgrade your tv. sugget buy new hd tv or get converter box from cable vision, or verizon with their package or buy the converter box from online.  if you want the converter check out this site&#8230; <a href="http://www.newcomputergen.com/get-dtv.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.newcomputergen.com/get-dtv.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is There Still a Need for Network DVRs? &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/cablevision-heck-yeah-were-doing-network-dvrs/#comment-462733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is There Still a Need for Network DVRs? &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=8365#comment-462733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] continue to scratch our heads over why Hollywood is so opposed to the notion of a cable company centrally hosting a [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] continue to scratch our heads over why Hollywood is so opposed to the notion of a cable company centrally hosting a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Maggos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/cablevision-heck-yeah-were-doing-network-dvrs/#comment-462732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Maggos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=8365#comment-462732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Jon - just drop the cable companies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;once we all have an Apple TV like box, the networks should just stream over the internet like CERN did (meaning in an application agnostic way) and video podcast their episodic content.  but for that to really work, we need to move from podcast to bittorrent RSS like Miro is pushing and the livingroom box needs to support streaming video in a lean-back interface.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;we are not close to this yet, but if this setup was as ubiquitous as cable is now, it would be a great day in the level of independence for producers and choice for consumers.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon &#8211; just drop the cable companies.</p>
<p>once we all have an Apple TV like box, the networks should just stream over the internet like CERN did (meaning in an application agnostic way) and video podcast their episodic content.  but for that to really work, we need to move from podcast to bittorrent RSS like Miro is pushing and the livingroom box needs to support streaming video in a lean-back interface.</p>
<p>we are not close to this yet, but if this setup was as ubiquitous as cable is now, it would be a great day in the level of independence for producers and choice for consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Smirl</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/cablevision-heck-yeah-were-doing-network-dvrs/#comment-462731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Smirl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=8365#comment-462731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It is easily within a cable company&#039;s ability to build a DVR that records every show on every channel &quot;just in case you missed it&quot;. This would effectively convert all of TV to on-demand. Drop the existing TV channels from cable and convert that bandwidth to IP. Serve the on-demand TV over IP. It&#039;s inevitable that this will happen. We just have to get rid of a bunch of lawyers first.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A TV channel is just a play list that you don&#039;t control.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is easily within a cable company&#8217;s ability to build a DVR that records every show on every channel &#8220;just in case you missed it&#8221;. This would effectively convert all of TV to on-demand. Drop the existing TV channels from cable and convert that bandwidth to IP. Serve the on-demand TV over IP. It&#8217;s inevitable that this will happen. We just have to get rid of a bunch of lawyers first.</p>
<p>A TV channel is just a play list that you don&#8217;t control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etaoin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/cablevision-heck-yeah-were-doing-network-dvrs/#comment-462730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[etaoin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=8365#comment-462730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Well, there is one problem to giving Cablevision even more control. A few months ago, I was in a battle with the company over a payment I knew I&#039;d made but they didn&#039;t have in their records. While I was away for the day, they cut off my service and it took nearly 15 hours to get it restored. Meantime, I could use the DVR because the recordings were in my house. If they weren&#039;t, and they were stored elsewhere, you can bet I wouldn&#039;t have had access. And how much information do you want Cablevision to have about what you&#039;re doing?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there is one problem to giving Cablevision even more control. A few months ago, I was in a battle with the company over a payment I knew I&#8217;d made but they didn&#8217;t have in their records. While I was away for the day, they cut off my service and it took nearly 15 hours to get it restored. Meantime, I could use the DVR because the recordings were in my house. If they weren&#8217;t, and they were stored elsewhere, you can bet I wouldn&#8217;t have had access. And how much information do you want Cablevision to have about what you&#8217;re doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

