<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadband Emmy Review: Satacracy 88</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:23:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Video: Is It Really Interactive? &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Online Video: Is It Really Interactive? &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/06/26/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] allowing the audience to vote on which of two options the story should follow. However, like I&#8217;ve said before, the story&#8217;s scattered and non-causal momentum seems to render the audience&#8217;s decision [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] allowing the audience to vote on which of two options the story should follow. However, like I&#8217;ve said before, the story&#8217;s scattered and non-causal momentum seems to render the audience&#8217;s decision [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tome Idle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tome Idle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 23:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/06/26/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, this writer is an idiot. Sounds like he&#039;s been paid off. Has he watched anything else on the web?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this writer is an idiot. Sounds like he&#8217;s been paid off. Has he watched anything else on the web?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Brashier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Brashier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/06/26/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the show, I think it&#039;s really good.  Can&#039;t wait to see the movie!!!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the show, I think it&#8217;s really good.  Can&#8217;t wait to see the movie!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Rubens</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Rubens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/06/26/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link to the NYTimes review, a great piece.  At the same time, I don&#039;t see any logic in the statement &quot;you are not a a very credible writer if you disagree with the Emmy and NY Times.&quot;

I liked what the Times had to say about Satacracy&#039;s storytelling style inside the online medium.  My biggest complaint about Satacracy is the seeming lack of causality in a show that demands the audience to make plots decisions.  Satacracy 88 is beautifully shot and edited, but I am supremely confused as to the driving story behind it.  I very much look forward to seeing ItsAllInYourHands.com continue to grow, but I hope they put more thought into the overall plot first and then allow the audience to discover that plot with their votes.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to the NYTimes review, a great piece.  At the same time, I don&#8217;t see any logic in the statement &#8220;you are not a a very credible writer if you disagree with the Emmy and NY Times.&#8221;</p>
<p>I liked what the Times had to say about Satacracy&#8217;s storytelling style inside the online medium.  My biggest complaint about Satacracy is the seeming lack of causality in a show that demands the audience to make plots decisions.  Satacracy 88 is beautifully shot and edited, but I am supremely confused as to the driving story behind it.  I very much look forward to seeing ItsAllInYourHands.com continue to grow, but I hope they put more thought into the overall plot first and then allow the audience to discover that plot with their votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rogan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Rogan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/06/26/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny review.  I noticed the show won an Emmy Award and your not impressed?  I read the NY Times review from the other comment too.  I&#039;m sorry Craig, but you are not a very credible writer if you disagree with the Emmy and the NY Times.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny review.  I noticed the show won an Emmy Award and your not impressed?  I read the NY Times review from the other comment too.  I&#8217;m sorry Craig, but you are not a very credible writer if you disagree with the Emmy and the NY Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYTGlowingReview</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NYTGlowingReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/06/26/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a differing opinion, check out this article in the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/30/arts/television/30hand.html?
_r=1&amp;oref=slogin
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a differing opinion, check out this article in the New York Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/30/arts/television/30hand.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/30/arts/television/30hand.html</a>?<br />
_r=1&amp;oref=slogin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Dugan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Dugan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/06/26/broadband-emmy-review-satacracy-88/#comment-448033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the review :-)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the review :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

