<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brightcove Gets a Bigger Piece of FOX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/brightcove-gets-a-bigger-piece-of-fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/brightcove-gets-a-bigger-piece-of-fox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpg</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/brightcove-gets-a-bigger-piece-of-fox/#comment-447840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/06/17/brightcove-gets-a-bigger-piece-of-fox/#comment-447840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting question posed...


Let&#039;s face it, the technology for video and dynamic ad serving is nearing off-the-shelf status.  All that really matters are the advertising relationships, which are strong with FOX and thin with BRIGHTCOVE (who have been running a single ABC pre-roll ad across their network for almost a month).
So, how long will the relationship last?  Until FOX starts demanding a  higher rev-share and BRIGHTCOVE&#039;S margins diminish to be not much more than a CDN with a nice CMS interface?
All we can hope is that BRIGHTCOVE dedicates efforts across the long-tail of independent content, who (i) don&#039;t have the advertising relationships and (ii) don&#039;t do enough volume to warrant setting up independent CDN accounts.  Which, if I&#039;m not mistaken, was their original Mission (read 2005  blogs and interviews with Allaire)?


I&#039;d give the relationship 12-months at the most.  Then FOX will hire away engineers, out-source programming to Argentina and set up their own online network that is amortized over 7-years.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question posed&#8230;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, the technology for video and dynamic ad serving is nearing off-the-shelf status.  All that really matters are the advertising relationships, which are strong with FOX and thin with BRIGHTCOVE (who have been running a single ABC pre-roll ad across their network for almost a month).<br />
So, how long will the relationship last?  Until FOX starts demanding a  higher rev-share and BRIGHTCOVE&#8217;S margins diminish to be not much more than a CDN with a nice CMS interface?<br />
All we can hope is that BRIGHTCOVE dedicates efforts across the long-tail of independent content, who (i) don&#8217;t have the advertising relationships and (ii) don&#8217;t do enough volume to warrant setting up independent CDN accounts.  Which, if I&#8217;m not mistaken, was their original Mission (read 2005  blogs and interviews with Allaire)?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d give the relationship 12-months at the most.  Then FOX will hire away engineers, out-source programming to Argentina and set up their own online network that is amortized over 7-years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

