<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Mulls Monitoring Your Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/video/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/video/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Throttle The Package: Europe&#8217;s Fight for Net Neutrality &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Throttle The Package: Europe&#8217;s Fight for Net Neutrality &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] ISPs like AT&amp;T have said they&#8217;re open to engaging in copyright enforcement in the past, and companies like Comcast have spent lots of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ISPs like AT&amp;T have said they&#8217;re open to engaging in copyright enforcement in the past, and companies like Comcast have spent lots of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comcast Abandons P2P Bill of Rights &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comcast Abandons P2P Bill of Rights &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] that the MPAA has been talking to ISPs to get them to filter content, and companies like AT&amp;T have previously expressed a willingness to cooperate with the entertainment [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the MPAA has been talking to ISPs to get them to filter content, and companies like AT&amp;T have previously expressed a willingness to cooperate with the entertainment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NBC: P2P Is Evil &#8212; Except When We Use It &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NBC: P2P Is Evil &#8212; Except When We Use It &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] is pointing to AT&amp;T as an example of an ISP&#8217;s willingness to install content filters, but the filing doesn&#8217;t explain how ISPs are supposed to deal with P2P protocol encryption [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is pointing to AT&amp;T as an example of an ISP&#8217;s willingness to install content filters, but the filing doesn&#8217;t explain how ISPs are supposed to deal with P2P protocol encryption [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verizon to Hollywood: I Said, &#8220;No, no, no!&#8221; &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verizon to Hollywood: I Said, &#8220;No, no, no!&#8221; &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] AT&amp;T, which has openly talked about technological solutions to piracy, and Comcast, which is being investigated for blocking [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AT&amp;T, which has openly talked about technological solutions to piracy, and Comcast, which is being investigated for blocking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zuck on This! Quotes from NBC&#8217;s Honcho &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zuck on This! Quotes from NBC&#8217;s Honcho &#171; NewTeeVee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] CES booth this year, NBC hosted a panel discussion on digital piracy in which AT&amp;T talked about monitoring your traffic, a solution which Zucker was all for back in October of 2007, when he called on ISPs, universities [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CES booth this year, NBC hosted a panel discussion on digital piracy in which AT&amp;T talked about monitoring your traffic, a solution which Zucker was all for back in October of 2007, when he called on ISPs, universities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko Roettgers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/video/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/att-mulls-monitoring-your-traffic/#comment-453551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;And of course the whole idea of fingerprint-based, file-specific blocking is DOA because people tend to use encrypted transfers anyway nowadays ...&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course the whole idea of fingerprint-based, file-specific blocking is DOA because people tend to use encrypted transfers anyway nowadays &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

