<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GigaOM &#187; Ookla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/tag/ookla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='gigaom.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://gigaom.com/osd.xml" title="GigaOM" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://gigaom.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>How many people have a gigabit connection? Fewer than you think.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/04/23/how-many-people-have-a-gigabit-connection-fewer-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2013/04/23/how-many-people-have-a-gigabit-connection-fewer-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ookla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=632531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's tough to count how many homes have a gigabit connection, but we can try to get some numbers to give a sense of how prevalent such connectivity is. The answer is not very.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=gigaom.com&#038;blog=14960843&#038;post=632531&#038;subd=gigaom2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://gigaom.com/2013/04/17/provo-utah-is-the-next-stop-for-google-fiber/">Google expands its commitment to bringing fiber-to-the-home</a> gigabit connections to more places, I wondered exactly how many people actually have gigabit connections. So I asked Ookla, the company that operates the Speedtest.net service for its data. Turns out, there&#8217;s no real way to calculate who has a gig, but the numbers we do have indicate that not too many people are living in the future when it comes to connectivity.</p>
<p>It turns out that between the first of this year and April 8 (when I got the data from Ookla) roughly one in 10,000 devices in the U.S. are surfing at gigabit speeds and roughly 1 in 5,000 homes worldwide can match them. Ookla runs the popular <a href="http://speedtest.net/">Speedtest.Net</a> service and got this data from users who tested their connections during that time period.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/ooklagigabit.jpg"><img  alt="ooklagigabit" src="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/ooklagigabit.jpg?w=708"   class="alignleft size-full wp-image-633181" /></a><br />
Unfortunately, the data on this is relatively inexact, because the art of measuring a gigabit is complicated. As late as last summer when Google launched the first plans for a fiber to the home buildout in Kansas City, the search giant <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/05/25/the-top-10-cities-with-the-best-broadband/">had to work with Ookla</a> to upgrade the test to even be able to read a gigabit. Even so, some customers with a gigabit might not show up because their Wi-Fi routers or computers can&#8217;t achieve those speeds and, thus, throttle them back to a mere 100 Mbps or so.</p>
<p>And the numbers provided by Ookla actually measure customers with speeds of above 800 Mbps, which is what it classifies as a gigabit. In the U.S. only 4,110 people have test results at that speed out of 45,468,731 people who used the Ookla tests. Globally, 34,721 users have speeds that high out of 224,404,945 tests. But, clearly not every broadband user is running Speedtest.net or has the right equipment.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/gigabitchart.jpg"><img  alt="gigabitchart" src="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/gigabitchart.jpg?w=708"   class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-633180" /></a></p>
<p>Ookla also provides data on the number of people whose connection speeds are 300 Mbps or greater. In the U.S. this was about 51,100 devices or about 11 in every ten thousand users. Globally it was 204,315 devices or 9 in every 10,000 users.</p>
<p>For additional data points, we can turn to the Fiber to the Home Council, which said a few weeks ago that <a href="http://gigaom.com/2013/04/02/who-knew-fiber-is-also-good-for-a-telcos-health/">640,000 subscribers are buying connections of 100 Mbps</a> or more across North America. That&#8217;s a significant number, although the FTTH Council is measuring capacity that is 10 times less than what a gigabit connection can offer. For reference, the FCC in February <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/measuring-broadband-america/2013/February">noted that the average U.S. subscribed broadband speed is now 15.6 Mbps</a>, representing an average annualized speed increase of about 20 percent. And below is a chart from FCC data at the end of 2011 showing the distribution of broadband speeds at the time.</p>
<div id="attachment_633552" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 460px"><a href="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fccdistrochart.jpg"><img  alt="This chart measures both wireless and wireline speeds as of Dec. 2011. " src="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fccdistrochart.jpg?w=708"   class="size-full wp-image-633552" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This chart measures both wireless and wireline speeds as of Dec. 2011.</p></div>
<p>But it looks like the FTTH Council &#8212; as well as Google&#8217;s experience in getting 90 percent of the neighborhoods in Kansas City signed up for fiber &#8212; can tell us something definitive about gigabit connections: People want them. When fiber-to-the home is offered 44.8 percent of the homes passed take the service. Given that those are generally the most expensive connections, that&#8217;s a pretty high take rate.</p>
<p>So it looks like even a few thousand Kansas City, Austin, Texas or Provo, Utah homes connected via Google Fiber will not only significantly change the percentage of gigabit customers in the U.S. but also around the globe. Still, we have to start somewhere.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=gigaom.com&#038;blog=14960843&#038;post=632531&#038;subd=gigaom2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/GigaOM_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=120497"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/GigaOM_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=120497" /></a></p><p><strong>Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:</strong><br />Subscriber content. <a href="http://pro.gigaom.com/?utm_source=tech&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=auto3&utm_term=632531+how-many-people-have-a-gigabit-connection-fewer-than-you-think&utm_content=shigginbotham">Sign up for a free trial</a>.</p><ul><li><a href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2012/02/netflix-may-suffer-from-limited-mobility/?utm_source=tech&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=auto3&utm_term=632531+how-many-people-have-a-gigabit-connection-fewer-than-you-think&utm_content=shigginbotham">Netflix may suffer from limited mobility</a></li><li><a href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2011/12/confused-about-the-wireless-markets-heres-a-breakdown/?utm_source=tech&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=auto3&utm_term=632531+how-many-people-have-a-gigabit-connection-fewer-than-you-think&utm_content=shigginbotham">Confused about the wireless markets? Here&#8217;s a breakdown</a></li><li><a href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2012/04/mobile-q1-the-fight-for-spectrum-goes-to-washington-the-tablet-wars-continue/?utm_source=tech&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=auto3&utm_term=632531+how-many-people-have-a-gigabit-connection-fewer-than-you-think&utm_content=shigginbotham">A look back at mobile in Q1</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2013/04/23/how-many-people-have-a-gigabit-connection-fewer-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/fiber-google-640x423.jpeg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/fiber-google-640x423.jpeg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">fiber.google-640x423</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/aee37121e18bf76bb9fee4494bab237a?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">shigginbotham</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/ooklagigabit.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ooklagigabit</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/gigabitchart.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gigabitchart</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fccdistrochart.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">This chart measures both wireless and wireline speeds as of Dec. 2011. </media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Top 10 Cities With the Best Broadband</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/25/the-top-10-cities-with-the-best-broadband/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/25/the-top-10-cities-with-the-best-broadband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Higginbotham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CNN Big Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey&#039;s Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SYN Straight News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ookla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speedtest.net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=122084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ookla, the 3-year-old company behind Speedtest.net introduced a broadband index today that tabulates the results of more than 1 million speed tests done each day. The global broadband speed is 7.69 Mbps while the U.S. speeds average 10.12 Mbps. For the top 10 cities, click through.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=gigaom.com&#038;blog=14960843&#038;post=122084&#038;subd=gigaom2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company behind the broadband speed testing site <a href="http://www.speedtest.net/">Speedtest.net</a> is ready to go beyond testing broadband quality and into the data game. Seattle-based Ookla has introduced a broadband index that tabulates results from the more than 1 million speed tests done each day around the world. It’s found that the average global broadband speed is 7.69 Mbps while the U.S. speeds average out at 10.12 Mbps.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/us-maphr610.jpg"><img title="us-mapHR610" src="http://gigaom.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/us-maphr610.jpg?w=604&#038;h=604" alt="" width="604" height="604" class=" alignleft"></a></p>
<p>Mike Apgar, co-founder and managing partner of three-year-old Ookla, said the indexes will measure broadband speeds, ping times and jitter. His goal is to move the testing beyond the tech-savvy market (we use it!), so as to get a better sense of how broadband speeds really play out across the world. The <a href="http://www.broadband.gov/qualitytest/about/">FCC is encouraging consumers</a> to use the sites (Ookla also runs a site that tests jitter and packet loss at <a href="http://www.pingtest.net/">pingtest.net</a>) as part of its nationwide testing goals, and many of Ookla’s ISP customers also offer the test to their customers and host Ookla’s servers.</p>
<p>Providing tests for ISPs is actually most of Ookla’s business. The next plank of the business strategy is the index data: Ookla hopes to provide the information for free to academic researchers, but it also plans to <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/05/13/microsoft-wants-to-build-its-business-with-data/">charge ISPs, analysts and governments</a> for it. Ookla has no debt or venture capital, and is profitable.</p>
<p>The company also today released a list of the top worldwide and U.S. cities based on their broadband speeds. It measured only cities with more than 75,000 people connecting for more than three months using a 30-day rolling average. The results are subject to change, and given that no place in the U.S. ranks in the global Top 10 (the first U.S. city is San Jose, which is ranked 18), I hope the results do shift.</p>
<p>Here are the top 10 U.S. cities and their corresponding 30-day average speeds:</p>
<ol><li>San Jose, Calif.             15.02 Mbps </li>
<li>Saint Paul, Minn.            14.53 Mbps </li>
<li>Pittsburgh, Pa.         14.18 Mbps </li>
<li>Oklahoma City, Okla.          12.12 Mbps </li>
<li>Brooklyn, N.Y.               12.10 Mbps </li>
<li>Tampa, Fla.                   12.05 Mbps </li>
<li>Bronx, N.Y.                  12.01 Mbps </li>
<li>New York, N.Y.               11.85 Mbps </li>
<li>Denver, Colo.                 11.68 Mbps </li>
<li>Sacramento, Calif.           11.34 Mbps </li>
</ol><p>The global top 10:</p>
<ol><li>Seoul, South Korea                34.49 Mbps </li>
<li>Riga, Latvia                      27.88 Mbps </li>
<li>Hamburg, Germany                  26.85 Mbps </li>
<li>Chisinau, Republic of Moldova     24.31 Mbps </li>
<li>Helsinki, Finland                 20.58 Mbps Mbps </li>
<li>Stockholm, Sweden                 19.97 Mbps</li>
<li>Bucharest, Romania                19.68 Mbps </li>
<li>Sofia, Bulgaria                   18.99 Mbps </li>
<li>Kharkov, Ukraine                  18.15 Mbps </li>
<li>Kaunas, Lithuania                 17.46 Mbps </li>
</ol><p><strong>Related GigaOM Pro Research</strong> (sub req’d): <a href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2010/05/big-data-marketplaces-put-a-price-on-finding-patterns/?utm_source=tech&amp;utm_medium=editorial&amp;utm_content=shigginbotham&amp;utm_campaign=intext&amp;utm_term=122084+the-top-10-cities-with-the-best-broadband">Big Data Marketplaces Put a Price on Finding Patterns</a></p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=gigaom.com&#038;blog=14960843&#038;post=122084&#038;subd=gigaom2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/GigaOM_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=967874"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/GigaOM_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=967874" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/25/the-top-10-cities-with-the-best-broadband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/aee37121e18bf76bb9fee4494bab237a?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">shigginbotham</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://gigaom.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/us-maphr610.jpg?w=604" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">us-mapHR610</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
