“500,000 of those downloads were to users who had never installed the app before,” says Danker, who adds that the application’s new ability to stream TV shows and radio over 3G as well as Wi-Fi is also proving popular.

“Last week, 20 percent of all requests on iPhone were on 3G. That’s amazing in such a short period of time. And yet when we look at the audience feedback, nobody has really reported streaming problems over 3G.”

The growth of mobile and tablet iPlayer viewing has been sharp in 2011. In October, 16.5m programmes were watched on these devices, up 129 percent year-on-year.

The key factor in this growth was the launch of native iPlayer apps for iPad and Android in February 2011. Previously, the catch-up TV service had been available as a mobile website.

“12 months ago, 5 percent of the total consumption of BBC iPlayer was on mobile and tablet,” says Danker. “Fast forward to today, and that figure is 10 percent, one of our fastest growing areas. A year ago, people were sceptical about whether this whole mobile or tablet TV viewing was going to be a big deal. A year on, it’s an entirely different story. No one would question it.”

Figures released by the BBC when it launched the iPhone version earlier in December claimed the existing app had been downloaded 1.5m times on iPad and 1.2m times on Android.

The 500,000 new-user iOS installs since indicates that iPlayer is now well past the 3m mark for downloads in the UK alone – BBC Worldwide’s separate global version is available elsewhere in the world.

“Our audiences no longer expect to watch our programmes to a specific schedule in a specific location,” says Danker. “There is an independence that comes with this mobile TV. Whether you are curled up in bed with the tablet, or tuning in to live news when on the road, it’s about that choice.”

Danker adds that BBC radio may be “the secret winner” from the updated iPlayer app, due to the app’s ability to stream radio in the background while people do other things on their iPads or iPhones.

The iPlayer’s Android app has not yet been updated with the 3G streaming feature. Danker says it’s coming, but that there are a few performance issues to iron out before the app is ready for release. Even so, launching the original iPlayer app simultaneously on iOS and Android in February was a reflection of the BBC’s public service remit.

“It’s part of our charter, and part of not pre-judging who’s going to be successful in the market,” says Danker.”We’ve managed to benefit a great deal from that, building a really great partnership with Google (NSDQ: GOOG) and delivering a great experience. It hasn’t been as smooth a path as on Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) due to the greater variety of devices on Android. But we are very happy being on Android.”

That said, iOS still “punches above its weight” when it comes to usage of the iPlayer native app, despite the sharp growth in Android device sales over 2011.

With that remit in mind, what mobile devices will iPlayer move to next – Windows Phone? BlackBerry? Danker says that the BBC assesses every platform based on where the audience is, as well as balancing experience with value for money.

“In most cases, the very best thing we can do for our audience is a mobile web page,” he says, declining to be drawn on specific platform plans. “Where an app store means audiences have an easier way of finding the product, and ways of doing things above and beyond like live TV and background running, we’ll go there.”

The addition of 3G to the native iPlayer app is significant, but how much of a strain is it placing on the mobile operator networks? Danker says the BBC worked closely with all the main operators before rolling out the feature.

“It could have been a disaster if we had not prepared,” he says. “If we were smaller, we could have moved faster, but because our product and service is so big, we could have had an adverse effect on mobile networks in the UK. We were methodical: we worked with all the operators to prepare their networks for what we’re coming out with.”

Danker thinks that a 3G-enabled iPlayer adds value for the operators, especially those who are selling unlimited-data tariffs (although those plans are certainly much more scarce than they used to be).

He adds that the BBC sees mobile and 3G specifically as an important plank for its Olympic Games coverage in 2012. “We intend to do quite a bit over 3G for the Olympics. It’s a very live event, and people don’t always want to wait until they get home to experience it.”

The broadcaster’s Olympic strategy also takes in red-button content for owners of Virgin Media’s TiVo set-top box, using the cable provider’s apps platform.

“Virgin Media has an open platform that runs Flash and is very easy to develop for. As a result, we are able to reinvest in the red button,” says Danker. “Everyone thinks red button is a crappy old technology that doesn’t look as beautiful as we have come to expect. But the behaviour of pressing red when you want more is really powerful.”

With the native iPhone version of iPlayer out, 3G streaming seemingly working well, and an Android update on the way, what next for iPlayer on phones and tablets? The ability to cache programmes on the device for offline viewing is a key request from viewers, but Danker politely keeps his cards close to his chest about when or whether that feature will be added.

He does stress that the iPlayer team will only add new features if they do not clutter the application’s simplicity. “The technologist instincts to continually push new features in tend to be the wrong instincts,” he says.How about social features? Music apps like Spotify have jumped on board Facebook’s Open Graph to get more people sharing more activity on the social network. Meanwhile, startups like Zeebox have been making headlines for their intent to put social features at the heart of the TV viewing experience, albeit on a second screen to the one that’s being watched.

“Our focus with respect to social is that it needs to make the storyline better,” says Danker.

“Second-screen experiences can either distract from the programme, or they can add to the storyline of the programme. I think we will come up with examples where it adds to the storyline. That’s our North Star for this: not to add interactivity for interactivity’s sake.”

This article originally appeared in MediaGuardian.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Welcome to the New Paradigm: TV Makers Rule
• Got a Cable Subscription? There’ll Be an App for That
• Development strategies for the app-developer community

Now the project is out in the open, and the Zeebox iPad app is live. So what’s it like — and what does it do? Here are my first impressions.

Getting started with Zeebox

You can think of Zeebox as a next-generation TV listings magazine. The app, which only works in the U.K. right now, is based around a simple interface — a list of programs that are on television right now.

The first step once you have downloaded it is to make sure you’re getting the right listings on-screen. In just a few seconds, I told Zeebox my cable provider, the area I live in, and it had what was on TV right then.

The next part of the process is to connect with your friends, logging in through Facebook and/or Twitter to see who else is using the app. Once that’s done, you can scroll through all your available channels and see who is watching what, or see which shows are currently most popular with Zeebox users.

Tapping on a show means you’re watching it — and takes you into a special program page that is packed with information. It has credits for the show itself, a stream of recent Twitter activity based on hashtags, links to apps and downloads related to the program and graphics that show you how popular the show is in real time.

Once you’re watching a show, other friends can see your avatar alongside it on their own listings page. If you see friends online watching a particular program, you can “join them” to indicate you’re watching the same show or start a chat about what it is you’re seeing. It’s swift and simple for the most part.

You’re not just limited to shows that are on right now, either; a quick swipe to the left or right lets you zip around the timeline to see what’s coming up or what you missed.

Here’s a program page for a repeat of the classic Batman TV series that happened to be showing while I was having a play around.

Next-gen remote control

But here’s the big trick that Zeebox has up its sleeve: You can also use it as a remote. That makes it not just a theoretical two-screen experience, but a real one. If you have a compatible internet television — specifically, one of dozens of models produced by Sony, Samsung, Panasonic or LG — you can use Zeebox on your small screen to control what’s happening on your big screen.

That means when you click a show in the app, it flips the channel for you on your television. And if you decide to join a friend to watch a show in Zeebox, your TV will automatically change to the same station. My own television wasn’t compatible, but a friend on the other end of the line reported that it worked well.

Aside from that piece of magic, there are some neat little touches elsewhere, such as the progress bar on each graphic that tells you, in a subtle way, how long each show has left. It’s a well-built, smart and highly usable app.

Even so, however, success won’t be easy. There’s a ton of competition out there.

Services like Miso and GetGlue have built ways of “checking in” to TV programs, and over the last few months alone, we’ve covered the launch of similar services, including BuddyTV, Matcha.tv and Fav.tv. But I get the feeling that Zeebox is in as good a position as any of them, and maybe better: it’s far more useable and sleekly put together than most. And with Rose, it has a CTO who knows this stuff inside out. It reportedly has $5 million in funding too, which is useful.

What Zeebox could do better

Here are a few things Zeebox needs to do if it wants to rise above the crowd.

• New countries. The biggest limitation, of course, is that it’s only serving British television. If Zeebox wants to make a real dent in the market, it’s going to have to crack other geographies as well. Apparently, it’s going to be branching out early next year — something that may be expensive, and may require strong connections with foreign TV providers. But it needs to happen.
• More comprehensive channel lineups. Services like this live and die on the quality of their data. If I have access to a TV channel that isn’t on my Zeebox listing, then it’s useless. When looking with a friend, we noticed that there were a few problems with the EPG data. It was nothing major — outdated logos, for example — but it needs to be totally reliable to catch on.
• TV on demand. We all know that a lot of viewing activity doesn’t happen alongside live TV. It would be interesting to see Zeebox hook into VOD content, or allow you to tell friends that you are watching a catch-up service. It breaks the TV listings model, but it’s where user activity is happening — especially among the sort of market who are likely to be using this app.
• Program stacking. I can look at shows that have just finished, are on right now and are coming next, but I can’t remind myself to watch things that aren’t being shown right now. Nor can I set an alert to tell me whenever one of my friends starts watching one of my favorite shows. Features like that would combine to increase the social viewing experience.
• Better notifications. As far as I could see, when a friend joins me to watch a program, there’s no real indication that I’ve got company. This means it doesn’t quite capture the feeling of all my friends swarming to watch a TV show with me. This could be improved. At the same time, the current hashtag feed from Twitter is interesting, but I’d like to be able to use it like a group chat among everyone who was watching with me — rather than the whole of Twitter.

Overall, it’s early days for Zeebox, and a lot could go wrong. But they have serious ambitions — the slogan is that it’s “the best thing to happen to TV since TV” — and a product that could match up to them.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Here Come the Social TV Apps
• Connected consumer third-quarter 2012
• Social-TV apps and consumer behavior

Upon launch, Netflix members from the UK and Ireland will be able to instantly watch a wide array of TV shows and movies right on their TVs via a range of consumer electronics devices capable of streaming from Netflix, as well as on PCs, Macs and mobile tablets and phones.

Further, crucial, details have yet to be announced — prices, catalog and so forth. But it will be interesting to see where this goes: not least because the road is likely to be a little bumpier than Netflix is used to.

Unlike the U.S, Canada and other American markets, where Netflix was able to move into a leading spot pretty much without impediment, it seems unlikely the company will not be able steamroller its way into a dominant position in the U.K. and Ireland without resistance.

There is one main rival, Lovefilm, which started off as a copycat DVD rental service but has been moving to online distribution as a way to insulate itself from this incursion. The company, which was bought out at the start of this year by Amazon for a rumored $200 million, boasts 1.5 million users and a library of 67,000 titles. While it doesn’t have the same punch as Netflix, it is entrenched to some degree.

YouTube could be considered a competitor, too, especially since it has started offering a film rental service. Most broadband and cable providers offer serious TV and movie-on-demand packages, too, which are easier for existing users to sign up to and operate than a third-party services.

And then there’s Vdio, the secret new video streaming service from the founders of Skype and Rdio, which GigaOM’s Janko Roettgers uncovered last week. That’s due to launch, and you can bet that the founders will have learned plenty from the failure of their previous video business, Joost.

There’s another player that cannot be ignored, too, in the form of the BBC’s iPlayer. That massively popular service is largely used by people to watch TV from publicly-funded channels, so in theory it is much more like Hulu than Netflix. But while it doesn’t focus on showing movies online, it does have a hidden influence on the market because it’s free, funded by Britain’s TV license fee. It’s possible to argue that it has severe downward pressure on the pricing of the market, and perhaps one reason why Lovefilm’s British user base is proportionally smaller than Netflix’s. Certainly it sets a standard that Netflix will need to match.

Still, reactions in my Twitter steam suggested that there is still plenty of space for Netflix to wedge itself into the market. Lovefilm clearly has some weaknesses, including the breadth of its catalog, the availability of its streaming services and its customer service. Here are just some of them:

• “This is great news. LoveFilm simply isn’t pushing aggressively enough here. We need competition in the UK to drive forward.” (@garethspence)
• “Assuming Netflix don’t have same issue, if it’s competitively priced I’d move for access to Universal Pictures films alone” (@andybee)
• “Welcome the competition, really – will hopefully improve things all round. Not loyal, @lovefilm cust service is atrocious.” (@jeremynicolas)
• “Absolutely loyal to Lovefilm, it was a UK venture after all. WIll be interesting to see how Netflix create their position…. Top 3 reasons to love lovefilm: 1) Ease of Use 2) Growing Watch Online portfolio 3) Pester free subscription” (@mattbambow)

Reed Hastings and his team will no doubt be taking note of that reaction and hoping they can provide a broad package that appeals to customers.

And they’ll certainly be looking for some good news to cheer up investors who have watched the last couple of months with confusion: customers confused by a price hike, then angered by it, before the business apologized and announced its plans to separate the DVD and streaming business… which it then backtracked on, unceremoniously killing the scheme before it was even born.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• How consumer media will change in 2013
• Who and what to watch in the new era of the living room
• Controversy, courtrooms and the cloud in Q1

Check out a video demonstration of the new iPlayer below:

The BBC is taking a page out of Netflix’s playbook with this new product; Netflix debuted its latest-generation UI on the PS3 as well, and the company has been using a combination of HTML5 and its APIs to rapidly innovate on its UI experience.

But the BBC’s move toward HTML5 also shows how important the emerging standard is becoming in the connected-TV world. Google TV and Boxee already have full-fledged web browsers integrated into their TV platforms, and others are expected to follow suit. HTML5 is also part of the new D-Book standard for connected devices, which is meant to ensure a smooth digital-TV switchover in the U.K.

However, the BBC isn’t putting all of its eggs in one basket with its new product. Summerfield wrote on Monday that the BBC is also building a version based on Adobe Flash 10.x and Air 2.x. From the blog post:

In addition to helping to make development easier we think building standard products on these two widely understood technologies will be able to address the majority of connected TV devices that we see our audience buying for their homes.

The BBC expects that in a few years, 50 percent of iPlayer usage will come directly from TVs.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• How consumer media will change in 2013
• What the shift to the cloud means for the future EPG
• Who and what to watch in the new era of the living room

It isn’t exactly the same as the British version of the iPlayer — for a start, it’s an app that only works on the iPad — but it’s being put forward as a pilot program that will expand its reach over time. As of today, users in eleven European countries will be able to download the iPlayer app and pay for access to a library of popular shows. Notable territories on this first launch are Germany, France, Italy and Spain, but the corporation hopes to roll out soon in America and elsewhere.

The app is priced roughly in line with other video subscription services, at €6.99 ($9.96) each month or €49.99 ($71.25) for a year. For their money, buyers get access to a range of BBC programming… and although it isn’t all of the business’s domestic output, the corporation boasts that it has more than 1,500 hours of programming available, from classics such as Fawlty Towers to modern hits like Sherlock and Top Gear. It also syndicates some shows from other British broadcasters, just as it does with TV stations such as BBC America (science fiction series Primeval and Misfits, for example).

Oh, yes — and, of course, there’s always Doctor Who. How could we ever forget him?

Shows can be streamed over a Wi-Fi network, but interestingly they are also viewable offline and over a 3G connection. That’s something they believe is really important to making more than just an alternative to other ways of viewing. It’s also an advance on the current British version of the iPlayer, which currently only really does streaming to devices, so local users may start agitating for the offline features.

Executives are keen to stress that this is just the first part of their plan to roll out the app globally, a move which will include regionalizing the player — showcasing different lineups of shows for different countries, depending on their tastes — and potentially expanding it to other platforms too.

More broadly, though, it’s also the latest sign of the increasing globalization of cord-cutting online video services. Just as the BBC has its plans to stretch beyond Britain, Netflix is expanding from North America into Europe. It’s starting in Spain as a way of circling around local competitor Lovefilm, which was bought by Amazon earlier this year, but Britain will come soon afterward. It looks like the pieces are all falling into place for an epic tussle.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Connected Consumer Q3: Netflix fumbles; Kindle Fire shines
• What Amazon’s new Kindle line means for Apple, Netflix and online media
• Connected Consumer Q2: Digital music meets the cloud; e-book growth explodes

However, until the release date of such a magical device is actually announced, the whole idea is little more than pie in the sky. So what do you do in the meantime if you want to kick back and watch some video on your Kindle?

Turns out it’s not impossible.

One developer at the BBC, Mark Longstaff-Tyrrell, came up with an ingenious solution to this pressing dilemma. By combining the broadcaster’s popular iPlayer video streaming service, a few bits of software and the magic of closed captioning, he has built what he calls (with tongue in cheek) “iPlayer for Kindle”.

Here’s how it works. The program plays with closed captions running. Each time there is a line of dialogue, a snapshot of the screen is taken. Over the course of an on-screen conversation or a series of scenes, these snapshots are compiled. Once that’s done, they can be put together to form a fairly accurate representation of the program — sort of like a stop-motion version of TV.

In addition, Longstaff-Tyrrell came up with a workaround for the moments when this closed caption system isn’t helpful — for example, when a dramatic moment happens on screen, but there is no subtitling because nobody is talking. At those moments the system takes a series of grabs at regular points through a scene.

Once all these pieces are in place, those captioned scenes and silent scenes are compiled into a file which you could save and flick through on your e-reader — looking something like a comic book that you can flip through to see the action. Here’s an example.

Obviously, this doesn’t turn your Kindle into a video player. It’s basically a long and carefully constructed joke. Longstaff-Tyrrell says, for example, that you can always print out your episodes onto paper, a format which “also allows distribution via the postal service” and that since a typical episode will be “weighing in at only 20MB and with offline viewing, this format has a clear advantage over existing mobile iPlayer services”. Still, who knows how it could be useful — it’s certainly a different way to catch up with your favorite programs.

So, yeah, it’s a rough and ready hack — but, like all the best ones, it has a sort of crazy elegance about it. Count me as a fan.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• How consumer media will change in 2013
• Q4 Wrap-up: SOPA and the future of digital content
• Connected Consumer 2012: A year of consolidation and integration

The BBC’s iPlayer was previously available on Boxee thanks to a third-party developer, but today’s launch marks the first time users will actually be able to watch full HD episodes of iPlayer content, thanks to a collaboration with the BBC.

The London event was also used for a quick preview of the Boxee iPad app. Officially announced at CES in January, the iPad app is now apparently very close to being submitted to Apple for iTunes store approval. The app will allow users to browse their friends’ queues, watch video on the go and even stream on-the-fly transcoded video within the home network — a feature that sounds very much like Plex.

Financial Times media journalist Tim Bradshaw did a quick Audioboo interview with Boxee CEO Avner Ronen at the event, and it’s worth the listen if you want to know a little more about Boxee’s U.K. ambitions, its take on the competition from YouView and features of the upcoming iPad app:

Image courtesy of Flickr user philcampbell.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• How consumer media will change in 2013
• What the shift to the cloud means for the future EPG
• Who and what to watch in the new era of the living room

The news came in an unceremonious blog post that seemed both apologetic and confused: “We’re sad to announce that next month will be the end of the road for SeeSaw,” it said. “SeeSaw has become a great place to watch TV for millions of U.K. viewers. However, as part of an ongoing strategic review of its business activities, Arqiva, our parent company, is no longer able to support the service.”

Users reacted strongly, with many pleading for it to be saved. SeeSaw’s closure, though, is a sad and desperate end to a story that has been troubled every step of the way, with the site fighting for survival almost from the moment it was conceived back in 2007.

When the project originally kicked off, the U.K. already has a massively successful online TV service in the shape of the BBC’s iPlayer. But due to the way the BBC is funded —- by an annual license fee that every household pays towards public service broadcasting, rather than by advertising —- it seemed impossible for the iPlayer to be turned into a commercial venture. Instead, the BBC joined forces with other TV companies in a consortium that planned to build a broad, multichannel online TV catchup service along the same lines as Hulu.

But once it was up and running that scheme, known as Project Kangaroo, hit all sorts of snags. The main broadcasters behind the service differed on how they wanted to implement it: Some said they would continue to run their own video-on-demand systems, others said they wanted Kangaroo to replace their existing offerings. Ashley Highfield, the BBC’s top technology executive, was brought in to run the project —- but ended up leaving to head Microsoft’s U.K. division instead.

That was awkward enough, but then came the coup de grace: Rupert Murdoch’s Sky TV, which wasn’t part of the consortium, led a full court press on government regulators to block Kangaroo’s progress. The grounds? That it was anti-competitive, and would allow a cabal of broadcasters to use their existing power to dominate the Internet video market. In the end, the regulators agreed, and ruled the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 were creating a platform that was too powerful —- and too exclusionary —- for the rest of the market to cope with.

Of course, Murdoch knew that on-demand Internet TV could be a public success. His own News Corporation was one of the key investors behind Hulu. But the idea that somebody else might launch a similar service was too much to bear. Kangaroo, cut adrift from its investors, went on the block.

In the end, things looked like they might work out when the service was bought by Arqiva, a British telecom and broadcast technology group, for £8m ($13 million USD). Early last year, they launched the service as SeeSaw, to some acclaim -— and immediately started looking for ways to make good on their money. They signed deals with American networks like NBC and MTV, and started negotiations with foreign broadcasters in an attempt to license the technology to other countries.

But none of it, apparently, was enough. Earlier this year, Arqiva said it was looking for investment partners and was open to offers. With no viable offers forthcoming, it’s decided that it is easier to shut things down completely.

SeeSaw has been troubled all the way, but it would be a mistake to assume that it was always doomed to failure. Yes, it had to deal with the complex and confusing world of British broadcasting, and it was forced to cope with being torpedoed by Rupert Murdoch, who seemed motivated as much by a spiteful relish as he was by competitive concerns.

But SeeSaw did nothing to help itself. Despite the huge amount of time and energy and money sunk into the project, it was barely known outside its core user base. It had to compete with the on-demand services that its founders worked on, and hardly registered in the public mind -— advertising for the service was so thin on the ground, I can’t remember seeing any promotion for SeeSaw in the last six months.

There is no denying, however, that the site’s demise paints anything other than a damning picture of the state of British innovation. Hampered by a complex and antagonistic relationship between the public broadcasters and private companies, perhaps the real miracle is that it ever launched at all. The irony is, of course, that SeeSaw’s failure leaves the door open to expansion from the likes of Netflix or Hulu itself —- companies who can now move in from across the Atlantic and shake things up. Murdoch wanted to shut down Kangaroo from the beginning, but even he couldn’t have imagined his plan would work out so well.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Controversy, courtrooms and the cloud in Q1
• Connected Consumer Q2: Digital music meets the cloud; e-book growth explodes
• Welcome to the New Paradigm: TV Makers Rule

The company is still in stealth mode, but Rose revealed some of his plans for tBone during an interview he gave at the Connected TV Summit. Tbone’s main mission seems to be to build a platform that will allow second-screen devices to interact with TV programming.

Rose said connected TV experiences have so far been hamstrung because broadcast content and devices have been closed platforms, and new developments are slow to make it to market. “On the set-top box and on TV, you’ve got often long lead times; you’ve got complicated committees,” he said, obviously speaking from his own experience at the BBC as well as the former CTO of British set-top box maker YouView. “On companion devices, you can write something today and have it live tomorrow.” (Check out the entire interview embedded below.)

Tbone isn’t the first company to target second screen devices for connected TV experiences. Social TV startups like Miso and GetGlue have been using mobile apps to allow users to check in to TV shows and movies similar to the way users can check into a location on Foursquare, and ABC has been experimenting with delivering content on iPads that’s relevant to what’s shown on TV.

ABC is using audio fingerprinting to make the iPad hear what a user is watching, but Rose called this approach messy, and limited because it’s a one-way street: incapable of talking back to the TV. “What you really want is software built into TVs that connects it all together,” he said.

This approach sounds very similar to what Synchronize.tv is attempting to do, and the similarities between the two companies don’t end with the syncing technology. Both tBone and Synchronize want to open up second-screen synchronization through accessible APIs, making it possible for others to build apps based on their platforms.

Some of these apps will undoubtedly use social networks to enhance the broadcast TV experience. Rose said that a tBone app could help to discover content based on what your Facebook friends are watching at any given moment, or deliver additional web content based on what’s covered in the news. “This will be the biggest disruptive thing ever in this space,” said Rose.

Check out the entire interview with tBone TV co-founder and CTO Anthony Rose below:

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• What the shift to the cloud means for the future EPG
• Social-TV apps and consumer behavior
• Welcome to the New Paradigm: TV Makers Rule

Sandvine reports that global video streaming traffic grew 26 percent during the event, and RTMP-based streaming video offerings were the one of the biggest beneficiaries of this surge. RTMP traffic grew by about 100 percent compared to normal levels, totaling about four percent of all Internet traffic. Other forms of video streaming saw more modest increases, with traditional non-live Flash video growing only slightly.

One of the more curious findings of Sandvine is that YouTube video traffic was actually down during the event, which seems odd, given the fact that the official royal family stream was hosted on YouTube. Sandvine explains it this way:

“This could be due, in part, to a preference for watching the event on the television, or on media Internet sites, with commentary and additional visuals that YouTube’s basic camera feeds lacked.”

However, there is another possible explanation: YouTube sometimes gets help from major CDNs to handle large live streaming events, and it could just be that the Royal Wedding stream, while hosted by YouTube, was actually an RTMP stream delivered from third-party servers. We’ve contacted both YouTube and Sandvine about this and will update this post if we hear more.

Update: Sandvine researcher Lee Brooks told us via email that the company did in fact include all the YouTube Live streams into the YouTube traffic category. He added:

“The actual shape of the YouTube profile is indicative of the success of their Royal Wedding Channel; however, with significantly fewer people active online than a normal Friday, over-all YouTube traffic was lower than normal.  The Royal Wedding’s contribution to YouTube’s traffic was still sufficient to make up the difference, though, and the Royal Wedding traffic from YouTube Live likely represented 2-3% of total Internet traffic during the ceremony itself.”

Either way, Adobe can mark this event as a success story for its Flash Media server offering, which is the primary source for RTMP streams. However, the picture may have looked a little different if more TV networks had offered live streams of the event for mobile and iOS devices. Case in point: The BBC’s iPlayer, which is available for iOS, saw huge spikes during the royal wedding, with mobile traffic growing up to 1400 percent.

Also worth noting: Overall Internet traffic was down 10 percent during the wedding, as many people were simply glued to their screens. However, people still had enough time to tweet and update their Facebook status, and the traffic of both of these services grew significantly.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

• Report: A Mobile Video Market Overview
• Report: The Live-Stream Video Market
• Report: The Connected TV Marketplace