<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows ReadyBoost: how much does it help a Samsung Q1P UMPC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;hola quiero el tema de nigga te quiero grasias chao alex&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>hola quiero el tema de nigga te quiero grasias chao alex</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 22:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Scotty: There&#039;s a 4GB limit on how much memory you can use for ReadyBoost, so that 32GB drive is probably overkill.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Scotty: There&#8217;s a 4GB limit on how much memory you can use for ReadyBoost, so that 32GB drive is probably overkill.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;If I had an SSD drive in my handtop, would ReadyBoost help?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If I had an SSD drive in my handtop, would ReadyBoost help?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Kendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 07:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve seen at least one other benchmark result on the web that puts the 800 MHz A1xx chips at the performance level of the Celeron processors.  One thing is clear, better battery life means you must throttle the processor back.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;ve seen at least one other benchmark result on the web that puts the 800 MHz A1xx chips at the performance level of the Celeron processors.  One thing is clear, better battery life means you must throttle the processor back.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 06:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frank, I&#039;m sure we&#039;re not using the same USB flash drive, so that will have an impact: different read/write speeds, for example. I&#039;m also running Vista Ultimate on a smaller drive partition.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;a, I&#039;m not sure what &#039;people who own big UMPCs&#039; means, but I do understand and appreciate what the new Intel processors are meant to and what they compete against. I&#039;ve drawn no conclusions on the new CPUs based on my one test above; I simply said it was interesting because it is to me. We&#039;ve had a number of readers ask about the expected performance of Vista or the 600- and 800 MHz A1xx chips, so I pulled in the comparison. An Intel processor that consumes less power is good for the UMPC market and I&#039;ve never said otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Frank, I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;re not using the same USB flash drive, so that will have an impact: different read/write speeds, for example. I&#8217;m also running Vista Ultimate on a smaller drive partition.</p>
<p>a, I&#8217;m not sure what &#8216;people who own big UMPCs&#8217; means, but I do understand and appreciate what the new Intel processors are meant to and what they compete against. I&#8217;ve drawn no conclusions on the new CPUs based on my one test above; I simply said it was interesting because it is to me. We&#8217;ve had a number of readers ask about the expected performance of Vista or the 600- and 800 MHz A1xx chips, so I pulled in the comparison. An Intel processor that consumes less power is good for the UMPC market and I&#8217;ve never said otherwise.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnNullstream</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnNullstream]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 06:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ready boost is only a high speed cache when it comes to random data access. Current flash is much much slower than a HDD for sequential &#039;stream&#039; access. Also writes are much slower than reads. My understanding is that it is not really implemented as a general purpose disk cache, but rather for optimizing app startup and pre-fetch etc. I&#039;m still not sure how this translates to real word performance. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the Q1 I stopped using it before I could get a feel for it though. I find that hanging a USB dongle off the end of the UMPC not only looks odd, but increases my likelihood of me breaking something. Although I could be convinced to plug it back in if someone could show me that it saved battery life. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Ready boost is only a high speed cache when it comes to random data access. Current flash is much much slower than a HDD for sequential &#8216;stream&#8217; access. Also writes are much slower than reads. My understanding is that it is not really implemented as a general purpose disk cache, but rather for optimizing app startup and pre-fetch etc. I&#8217;m still not sure how this translates to real word performance. </p>
<p>On the Q1 I stopped using it before I could get a feel for it though. I find that hanging a USB dongle off the end of the UMPC not only looks odd, but increases my likelihood of me breaking something. Although I could be convinced to plug it back in if someone could show me that it saved battery life. :)</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 04:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;people (like Kevin) keep taking stabs at the new Intel CPU&#039;s based on ONE benchmark. but they are forgetting the main reason for these new Intel chips, MUCH smaller package &amp; use less power. this will allow Intel CPU&#039;s to compete with Via in the small market. it seems like people who own big UMPC&#039;s have the wrong mindset &amp; just dont understand the goal of the new Intel CPU.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;besides, i would never compare these benchmarks floating around of highly optimized enthusiasts machines versus 1 lousy default Q1u configuration.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people (like Kevin) keep taking stabs at the new Intel CPU&#8217;s based on ONE benchmark. but they are forgetting the main reason for these new Intel chips, MUCH smaller package &#038; use less power. this will allow Intel CPU&#8217;s to compete with Via in the small market. it seems like people who own big UMPC&#8217;s have the wrong mindset &#038; just dont understand the goal of the new Intel CPU.</p>
<p>besides, i would never compare these benchmarks floating around of highly optimized enthusiasts machines versus 1 lousy default Q1u configuration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arechek</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arechek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 04:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;who cares about ReadyBOB ?&lt;br /&gt;
just set bios to always boot from usb stick, or get IDE socket and SSD drive for 5 bucks.&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly this is another feature some &#039;architect&#039; did not think over.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>who cares about ReadyBOB ?<br />
just set bios to always boot from usb stick, or get IDE socket and SSD drive for 5 bucks.<br />
Clearly this is another feature some &#8216;architect&#8217; did not think over.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arechek</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arechek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 04:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;who cares about ReadyBOB ?&lt;br /&gt;
just set bios to always boot from usb stick, or get IDE socket and SSD drive for 5 bucks.&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly this is another feature some &#039;architect&#039; did not think over.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>who cares about ReadyBOB ?<br />
just set bios to always boot from usb stick, or get IDE socket and SSD drive for 5 bucks.<br />
Clearly this is another feature some &#8216;architect&#8217; did not think over.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ctitanic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_readybo/#comment-404682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ctitanic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 02:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/windows_readybo#comment-404682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/39128821@N00/481963977/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/39128821@N00/481963977/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wonder why I&#039;m getting a higher score. I&#039;m using Vista Business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/39128821@N00/481963977/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/39128821@N00/481963977/</a></p>
<p>I wonder why I&#8217;m getting a higher score. I&#8217;m using Vista Business.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

