<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Mobile to handle new Office doc formats next year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Feger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Feger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has always been a problem with Microsoft.  They break the file format every time they come out with a new version.  Way back in the day, when WordPerfect still held some ground (remember those days?), a big selling point was how they maintained the file format through successive versions without compromising the ability to add features.

These days, even though I am a very big Microsoft fan, I usually tell individuals to avoid Microsoft Office and go to Open Office 2.0.  It&#039;s free, it does at least 90% (if not 100%) of what the average user needs.  MS Office will still rule the corporate desktop (it IS very good), but the basic functionality has become a commodity.  Issues like this only emphasize that fact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has always been a problem with Microsoft.  They break the file format every time they come out with a new version.  Way back in the day, when WordPerfect still held some ground (remember those days?), a big selling point was how they maintained the file format through successive versions without compromising the ability to add features.</p>
<p>These days, even though I am a very big Microsoft fan, I usually tell individuals to avoid Microsoft Office and go to Open Office 2.0.  It&#8217;s free, it does at least 90% (if not 100%) of what the average user needs.  MS Office will still rule the corporate desktop (it IS very good), but the basic functionality has become a commodity.  Issues like this only emphasize that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bushway</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Bushway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[better yet - just set the default save behavior in the office 2007 apps to the 97 - 2003 format and forget about having to remember the Save As.

Office button / Options / Save]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>better yet &#8211; just set the default save behavior in the office 2007 apps to the 97 &#8211; 2003 format and forget about having to remember the Save As.</p>
<p>Office button / Options / Save</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Walker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin Walker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if MS have compatibility sorted for Windows Mobile by the middle of &#039;07 it&#039;ll still take the operators months to ship phones with this installed on or release ROM upgrades for existing models.

I think we&#039;ll all be using &quot;Save As&quot; for a while yet ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if MS have compatibility sorted for Windows Mobile by the middle of &#8217;07 it&#8217;ll still take the operators months to ship phones with this installed on or release ROM upgrades for existing models.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ll all be using &#8220;Save As&#8221; for a while yet ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Man</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tax Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Since I use Macs and handheld devices in my business, I think I&#039;ll be waiting to upgrade to Office 2007.  I looked briefly at the trial version and aside from the interface looking different it didn&#039;t appear to be all that compelling. Expecting people who receive documents and spreadsheets from me to download a file conversion utility to read them is not worth the hassle.  I may be an early adopter but my clients don&#039;t necessarily share my lust for the latest and greatest.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Since I use Macs and handheld devices in my business, I think I&#8217;ll be waiting to upgrade to Office 2007.  I looked briefly at the trial version and aside from the interface looking different it didn&#8217;t appear to be all that compelling. Expecting people who receive documents and spreadsheets from me to download a file conversion utility to read them is not worth the hassle.  I may be an early adopter but my clients don&#8217;t necessarily share my lust for the latest and greatest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bushway</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Bushway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        slight correction - not just viewers, but ability to open / edit those versions as well.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        slight correction &#8211; not just viewers, but ability to open / edit those versions as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bushway</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Bushway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not totally accurate in regards to the mac. The Mac Business Unit is stating that they will be coming out with a 2007 compatability viewers next year as well - about 6 - 8 months in to 2007, I believe.

My advice to everyone at this point is to set the default save behavior in Options to save in 2003 format until these save compatability issues are resolved around the board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not totally accurate in regards to the mac. The Mac Business Unit is stating that they will be coming out with a 2007 compatability viewers next year as well &#8211; about 6 &#8211; 8 months in to 2007, I believe.</p>
<p>My advice to everyone at this point is to set the default save behavior in Options to save in 2003 format until these save compatability issues are resolved around the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Office 2007 compatability issues</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Office 2007 compatability issues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicodin.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicodin.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xanax.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xanax.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free jenna jameson porn.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows_mobile_-5/#comment-49576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Free jenna jameson porn.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/windows_mobile_-5#comment-49576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

