http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-speedtest/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-speedtest/#comment-363674 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:57:22 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/wimax-speedtest#comment-363674 Looking forward to your thoughts on the X301.

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-speedtest/#comment-363675 Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:03:50 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/wimax-speedtest#comment-363675 AllanCJ, I agree and specifically asked about the impact to battery life with regards to the X301. These configurations are so new (as is the network) that Lenovo hasn’t been able to do any controlled testing yet to answer that question. I’ll ping Lenovo again in a week or two in hopes of getting additional information.

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-speedtest/#comment-363676 Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:59:28 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/wimax-speedtest#comment-363676 It would be interesting to know about battery life as the uplink in Wimax is reckoned to be a bit inefficient as regards energy use

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-speedtest/#comment-363677 Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:40:50 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/wimax-speedtest#comment-363677 Geez SteveGarin, I didn’t read one single complaint in that post. What’s the problem?

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-speedtest/#comment-363678 Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:32:10 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/wimax-speedtest#comment-363678 Kevin why in the world are you complaining about a 2.5 houf drive? I do this every day! I am wondering why both of you continually love to complain to get something? Remember you sre lucky you are invited to these events! Some of us arent so lucky and hearing how hard your drive is just something that makes me laugh.. Get over it

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-speedtest/#comment-363679 Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:31:19 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/wimax-speedtest#comment-363679 Nice! Can I borrow a cup of bandwidth, please?

]]>