<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiMax module prices nearly double WiFi chip prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-module-pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-module-pr/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: giovani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-module-pr/#comment-392869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[giovani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/wimax-module-pr#comment-392869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Intel&#039;s supposed plan to make WiMAX the WWAN standard is/was to make sure every new laptop ships with it, and hope that providers would decide to build out WiMAX rather than HSDPA/EVDO.  WiMAX is classified by most as 4G.  Unfortunately, it looks to me as if Intel has been late to the built-in game.  The Sony laptop I bought last year came out of the box with a Sprint EVDO Rev. A card inside.  The first round has definitely gone to EVDO (in the US).  We&#039;ll see if WiMAX, with its tighter standards, and massive Intel influence can secure the second, and future rounds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bryan ... Wikipedia and Google are your friends.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Intel&#8217;s supposed plan to make WiMAX the WWAN standard is/was to make sure every new laptop ships with it, and hope that providers would decide to build out WiMAX rather than HSDPA/EVDO.  WiMAX is classified by most as 4G.  Unfortunately, it looks to me as if Intel has been late to the built-in game.  The Sony laptop I bought last year came out of the box with a Sprint EVDO Rev. A card inside.  The first round has definitely gone to EVDO (in the US).  We&#8217;ll see if WiMAX, with its tighter standards, and massive Intel influence can secure the second, and future rounds.</p>
<p>Bryan &#8230; Wikipedia and Google are your friends.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-module-pr/#comment-392870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/wimax-module-pr#comment-392870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Can someone possibly explain what WiMax is?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Can someone possibly explain what WiMax is?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-module-pr/#comment-392871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/wimax-module-pr#comment-392871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Yes, it could eventually supplant today&#039;s 3G connections, but it will likely take several years to have the same footprint / coverage of today&#039;s 3G networks. Bear in mind these costs aren&#039;t the costs to the consumer either. You&#039;ll likely see WiMax data cards priced like today&#039;s 3G cards.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Yes, it could eventually supplant today&#8217;s 3G connections, but it will likely take several years to have the same footprint / coverage of today&#8217;s 3G networks. Bear in mind these costs aren&#8217;t the costs to the consumer either. You&#8217;ll likely see WiMax data cards priced like today&#8217;s 3G cards.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-module-pr/#comment-392872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nomo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/wimax-module-pr#comment-392872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Is WIMAX expected to eliminate the need for a separate WWAN hardware? If so, the cost seems reasonable.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Is WIMAX expected to eliminate the need for a separate WWAN hardware? If so, the cost seems reasonable.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr bobo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wimax-module-pr/#comment-392873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr bobo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/wimax-module-pr#comment-392873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;802.11g is compatible with 802.11b.  Saying something is 802.11g compatible implies that it is extremely likely it can fall back to 802.11b.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>802.11g is compatible with 802.11b.  Saying something is 802.11g compatible implies that it is extremely likely it can fall back to 802.11b.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

