Comments on: Warner Crocker laments the lack of high-resolution Tablets

By: MiniMage

MiniMage — Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:08:04 +0000

I’m with rebel. I use 1024×768 on my tablet, because I have no better choice. It is certainly not my sweet spot. I hope my next tablet is at least SXGA and has a graphics card capable of handling Age of Empires III. I know, the serious-minded folks don’t want me to hope to play a game, but I’m ignoring them.

By: Jefferson Berlin

Jefferson Berlin — Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:06:44 +0000

Fujitsu T4020D is available with beautiful, wide-angle 1400 x 1040 screen, much nicer than M200. I've just switched. Very similar functionality, built-in optical drive. Lacks eraser pen and soft screen buttons, but very attractive option. I'm delighted with it so far, particularly the screen.

By: El Camino

El Camino — Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:09:24 +0000

Don't forget that the Fujitsu 4020 also has a SXGA+

By: arebelspy

arebelspy — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:53:44 +0000

“My proof of that- almost half of all visitors to jkOnTheRun are running at 1024×768.”

I’m not sure how telling that proof is, when you just finished saying almost all Tablet PC users (a large portion of your readers, I’m sure) are limited to that resolution not by their choice..

-arebelspy

By: PJE

PJE — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:48:07 +0000

The issue with regard to font size is down to the operating system. There should be an easy way to scale up the graphics – using more pixels for the fonts.

At present it takes too much work, and too many applications are hard coded for smaller fonts.

By: Warner Crocker

Warner Crocker — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:19:03 +0000

Thanks for the shout out. I see the same statstics for screen resolution from my blog readers. I wonder if that would change if more higher res optiosn were available.

By: Taking prozac for pmdd.

Taking prozac for pmdd. — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:20:57 +0000

By: Kamagra.

Kamagra. — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:20:57 +0000