<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wacom&#8217;s 20 inch digitizer screen for that serious artist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/wacoms-20-inch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wacoms-20-inch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wacoms-20-inch/#comment-397049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/wacoms-20-inch#comment-397049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a great new model simply because it&#039;s essentially the same resolution as the 21UX (1600X1200 vs 1680 X 1050 = a 70 pixel squared differential) but is 500 dollars cheaper. Since it&#039;s only 1 inch smaller in active area size (which matters as much as resolution), I&#039;d say this is quite a bargain!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure if you also noticed the Cintiq 12wx which can be found here &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wacom.com/cintiq/12WX.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wacom.com/cintiq/12WX.cfm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For $999. It is more reminiscent of the Intuos line of tablets, but with a full 12&quot; (1280X800) screen embedded, with expresskeys and an extra button that allows you to toggle between using it like a traditional tablet and a tablet screen. At that rate too, the Cintiq 12 WX is the lowest cost/inch of any Cintiq model available from Wacom.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pretty amazing stuff!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>This is a great new model simply because it&#8217;s essentially the same resolution as the 21UX (1600X1200 vs 1680 X 1050 = a 70 pixel squared differential) but is 500 dollars cheaper. Since it&#8217;s only 1 inch smaller in active area size (which matters as much as resolution), I&#8217;d say this is quite a bargain!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if you also noticed the Cintiq 12wx which can be found here </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wacom.com/cintiq/12WX.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.wacom.com/cintiq/12WX.cfm</a></p>
<p>For $999. It is more reminiscent of the Intuos line of tablets, but with a full 12&#8243; (1280X800) screen embedded, with expresskeys and an extra button that allows you to toggle between using it like a traditional tablet and a tablet screen. At that rate too, the Cintiq 12 WX is the lowest cost/inch of any Cintiq model available from Wacom.</p>
<p>Pretty amazing stuff!</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t lewis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/wacoms-20-inch/#comment-397050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[t lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/wacoms-20-inch#comment-397050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Dude! My name in lights on your august site! I&#039;m feeling all shy and unworthy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am lusting a bit over this new Cintiq...I&#039;ve been using the widescreen Tosh M7 for the last few months and although I have some major quibbles with its build quality (wobbly screen, noisy fan, etc) I&#039;ve gotten kinda addicted to 14&quot; widescreen. Perfect for the hard horizontal comic strip format. The 20wsx does look seductive for the same reason.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I&#039;m actually in the market for a deal on the discontinued 18sx Cintiq, solely due to its compatibility with tabletpc pens. I hate switching my stylus every time I swivel around to my tablet. It seems like a small thing, but it drives me nuts over the course of hours on intense projects.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW...the whole Wacom stylus puzzle among their different lines - Artpad, Intuos, Graphire, Cintiq, Tabletpc - is  baffling, and they do a terrible job of clarifying it on their site. Yet another aspect of the MStic Wall of Neglect &amp; Befuddlement standing between customers and the Tablet Dream.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude! My name in lights on your august site! I&#8217;m feeling all shy and unworthy.</p>
<p>I am lusting a bit over this new Cintiq&#8230;I&#8217;ve been using the widescreen Tosh M7 for the last few months and although I have some major quibbles with its build quality (wobbly screen, noisy fan, etc) I&#8217;ve gotten kinda addicted to 14&#8243; widescreen. Perfect for the hard horizontal comic strip format. The 20wsx does look seductive for the same reason.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m actually in the market for a deal on the discontinued 18sx Cintiq, solely due to its compatibility with tabletpc pens. I hate switching my stylus every time I swivel around to my tablet. It seems like a small thing, but it drives me nuts over the course of hours on intense projects.</p>
<p>BTW&#8230;the whole Wacom stylus puzzle among their different lines &#8211; Artpad, Intuos, Graphire, Cintiq, Tabletpc &#8211; is  baffling, and they do a terrible job of clarifying it on their site. Yet another aspect of the MStic Wall of Neglect &#038; Befuddlement standing between customers and the Tablet Dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

