Verizon: Please Stop Disabling GPS in Smartphones on Your Network
Smartphones have grown in capability over time, and that growth has led to a great deal of usefulness that extends far beyond the simple phone call. Today’s smartphones can tap into the web at a deep level, keeping owners connected in numerous ways. Many smartphones now have dedicated GPS chipsets on board, providing complete navigation systems to rival, standalone GPS units. That is unless the smartphone is on the Verizon network, in which case there is a good chance the carrier has disabled the GPS hardware. This is an open letter to Verizon to stop this practice.
Dear Verizon,
You are in this business to make money, I understand that. You are responsible to your shareholders to provide the best return possible, and you are obligated to find revenue streams toward that goal. I would like to exhort you to find streams that are in line with your core business, and not at the sole expense of your customers. Without your customers, you will fail. It makes no sense to take things from the customer that you have no business taking. I am referring to the GPS functionality of the smartphones that you sell.
Integrating GPS into smartphones makes sense on many levels. The ability for customers to have a full GPS unit contained in a smartphone is a big benefit to them. This benefit is the reason that handset makers are including GPS functionality in the phones in the first place. Smartphones are carried everywhere by your customers, and it makes perfect sense for them to leverage the functionality of the integrated GPS hardware. So please stop disabling this functionality.
Why do you release phones on your network that have sophisticated GPS hardware, yet you disable it so the customer cannot use it to its full potential? Sure, you always allow it to be used with your own navigation service, but other solutions are blocked from doing so. Even solutions that are included on the smartphones by the manufacturer, for example BlackBerry Maps by RIM, are routinely blocked by you so they cannot be used as intended. The only party hurt by this blockage is your own customer.
We can only make the assumption that you block the use of the GPS hardware by third-party providers in order to promote the use of your own subscription service. I understand your job is to derive as much revenue from subscribers as possible, but to do so by disabling functionality of the phones you sell is a big disadvantage to your customer. You are playing games with your customers, and this practice needs to stop.
The practice has been repeated with many smartphones released on the Verizon network, and it goes like this: A phone with integrated GPS hardware is released by Verizon. Customers buy it, only to discover that the GPS hardware cannot be used as expected. These customers sound off in user forums on the web, and Verizon’s reputation is harmed as a result. Months pass, and eventually Verizon makes an announcement that Smartphone X is now being opened to allow the GPS hardware to be used for solutions besides Verizon’s subscription service. Customers rejoice, but they remember how long they were denied the ability to use the handset as its maker intended. And they do remember, believe me.
This is not an isolated practice; it has happened over and over again, affecting numerous smartphones. The first smartphone affected was the BlackBerry 8830, and customers were so annoyed that a class action lawsuit was filed. Sure, the lawsuit was about the way the phone was pitched to prospective customers, but a suit filed by your own customers cannot ever be a good thing for your business.
As I’ve said, this ridiculous practice has been repeated too many times, the most recent being your announcement that you were going to allow your customers who bought the Samsung Omnia smartphone to fully use the hardware as intended by Samsung. If you believe that you come off as a good guy by once again removing the arbitrary restriction that you, and you alone, put in place, then I can tell you that is not the case. You come off looking as petty, and willing to gain at your customers’ expense. As I said before, customers remember. Make no mistake about that.
I fully understand that it is your network, and you have every right to disable hardware functionality on any phone. Your right to do so is not in question. The logic of doing so, however, is greatly in question. I am confident you would state that your constant disabling of GPS functionality (non-Verizon) is a matter of network security. That is usually your excuse for not allowing customers to do things they want to do. But in this instance I don’t buy into the security excuse. The programs and services you end up blocking are the same ones you eventually approve on every single device you restrict.
Thanks for hearing me out about this issue. Please stop disabling GPS in the smartphones you sell. We customers pay for the phone, we pay for the service, and we demand the ability to use them both to their full advantage.
Sincerely,
James Kendrick
jkontherun.com
Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.
Excellent letter, James! I’d also point out to them that unlocking GPS does not necessarily mean that they’ll lose money. If they innovate and offer services better than the other available options, people will gladly pay for them. Add value, and they will come.
Also worth noting that they’ve played this game on other things, too. Bluetooth (remember the V710 lawsuit?), video streaming, audio streaming, and tethering.
Verizon should be above this nonsense.
+1, as the kids say. Actually I think I’ve complained about this very thing before on this very blog. Nothing screams “we care more about profit than we do about our customers” more than taking away features.
it is absolutely insane what carriers are allowed to get away with, no worse offender than VZW. it seems to me they are trying everything in their power to avoid becoming the “dumb pipes” we all know (them too) they actually are.
Let’s make it a general letter to all the carriers and include removal of front-facing cameras too!
Interesting timing on this James. Yesterday Verizon released a long awaited ROM upgrade for the Samsung Omnia (i910) which unlocked the GPS.
I just talked with Verizon reps about this very thing last week! And in the process I learned of their latest atrocity – mandating a $30+ data plan for any new smartphone. I’ve told them I’ll be switching to a provider which is more sensitive to its customers when my phone wears out.
Excellent letter, James.
Verizon has acted like this forever. Not only GPS, but BlueTooth and WiFi have also been looked at unfavorably in their eyes.
You’re a little late to the party, James. Verizon started unlocking the GPS on smartphones some time ago, and now they’re actually being released with unlocked GPS.
If you had released this letter about six months ago, I would have been with you. As it stands, it’s kind of a complaint about nothing.
They have released some phones with unlocked GPS but there still are phones they are releasing locked so it is still timely. The Samsung Omnia was only unlocked yesterday, but only this one phone.
I don’t know of any recent phone releases that have been released with locked GPS. I stand by my comment. This is a problem that Verizon has already fixed.
As for previous models. While I’d like to think they’ll keep unlocking older models, I don’t think it’s realistic to expect it.
@Nate – I have a Blackberry Pearl 8230, from Verizon, and the GPS is LOCKED. This is not an “older model”. So, now you do know of a new phone from Verizon that was shipped with the GPS disabled.
Great letter.
There does not seem to be an “official” ROM for the Omnia yet. I could get the unofficial one, and risk bricking my phone, but I’ll wait a couple weeks to see if Verizon if ready to do the right thing yet. Hopefully they discontinue this practice soon.
I unlocked my Omnia yesterday with an offical ROM updates. After applying the update you have to dig into a menu option (start->Settings->Phone) and then enable the GPS for third party use after which it will warn you that other programs can see your location. You can elect to not be warned about that again and then the GPS will work as expected.
There are many current Verizon smartphones that have unlocked GPS…
HTC Ozone
Samsung Saga
HTC Touch Pro
Samsung Omnia
Blackberry Storm
Blackberry Tour
Pearl
Pearl Flip
Curve
My Tour GPS is locked. Doesn’t work with Intelligolf GPS range Finder.
Sadness
Now all we need is one for AT&T
Verizon’s excessively-aggressive removal of features, relatively high prices, and the notion that it’s the Verizon App store or no app store is a bit baffling to me.
I gladly paid a $175 termination fee to leave them for AT&T and I now pay $30 less a month. With recent events being what they are, I cannot fathom going back to Verizon.
Verizon is not alone with this behavior.
ATT has chosen to disable Blackberry Maps on the Blackberry Bold. You can install it, but ATT service books will hide the App effectively preventing it’s use. The GPS hardware is still active and you can use other GPS software such as GoogleMaps or Garmin’s software, but you will not be able to use BlackBerry Maps.
This was particularly frustrating since when the Bold first came to ATT, BlackBerry Maps could be loaded and would work just fine. An update to their service books “disabled” BlackBerry Maps.
CellularSouth specifically tells me the GPS hardware is fully usable with any software with the BlackBerry 8830.
Not so. Only the TeleNav software will use it. This is identical to Verizon’s setup. GoogleMaps and Blackberry Maps can be loaded, they just do not have access to the GPS signal. GoogleMaps will find you location by using Cell Towers, but it is not accurate enough.
It seems that CellularSouth got their BlackBerry 8830′s setup identically to Verizon’s. Unfortunately, tech support did not even know about this.
I would gladly move to Sprint or T-Mobile if either of those carriers had better networks where I live.
Completely agree. I live in the UK, and can’t believe the things the US carriers think they can get away with. It’s part of the reason I won’t use handsets with carrier-customised firmware, I always buy unlocked generic handsets.
Another one for your campaign – useless, bug-ridden carrier-branded driver software for dongles. I have an 02 (UK carrier) branded unlocked Novatel MC930. It has the crappiest driver software on-board, it’s slow, often hangs or crashes on startup, and doesn’t work properly with other networks.
You can’t officially download the generic software. I managed to get hold of the generic software, but the generic drivers don’t work, so I have to start and close the 02 software every time I use the dongle.
Alan.
Have you considered switching carriers? Verizon is within their rights, however jerkish, to disable whatever feature on whatever phone they sell. ATT disables MMS on their IPhones. In my opinion, this blog seems to slightly prefer Verizon over other carriers, even though the alternatives like Sprint and T-Mobile do not come with the same shortcomings. Of course, that’s your right too, but I would consider checking out the competition if they offered better advantages.
I’m curious why you think the site is biased towards Verizon. After years of being a happy VZ customer, I left them for AT&T to get an original iPhone. I still maintain a 3G data account with Verizon. I also bought a Palm Pre on Sprint’s network and had a brief stint with T-Mobile when I used my Dash. James currently has phones and voice plans on all 4 carriers as well, and has written extensively about all of them.
Again, just curious on how you’re forming your opinion; not arguing it any way.
While I appreciate James’ point of view, I cannot agree with what seems to be the underlying premise. VZW has every right to enable/disable features on phones. Meanwhile, it is the consumer’s right to vote, with their subscription and dollars, to select a phone and carrier. I think its great to lobby for features and capabilities but I question whether a carrier has an obligation to enable any feature in the hardware and/or firmware that is not enabled on the day the contract is signed for service. I’m glad that James’ is appealing to the business model side of the issue and hope that he has stimulated some discussion at VZW.
“Your right to do so is not in question.” – I would love to have a conversation with some Fed anti-trust lawyers about this statement. After all they are starting to investigate the exclusive handset contracts. Along the same lines I would not be surprised if they wanted to look into the issue and in the end concluded the above statement does not stand.
I just got an 8330 two weeks ago. The BB Maps GPS works fine. With any other application, including Google maps, the GPS does NOT work. I’m kinda miffed actually…
Have a alltel curve and it just looks for satellites
I have been ticked off with VWZ for programming the PN820 smartphone so you cannot remove the data connection. This means all pix messages are sent automatically as data usage messages, when the manual states that as long as you do not enable your internet connection pix messages could be sent both ways.
I complained about it and they played dumb about it. And I don’t want to hear it about they have the right to disable features, because what was advertised is not what is capable, and they are not doing anything about it.
Did Microsoft have the right to disable other browsers or to be the default browser on their operating system? Sounds like Verizon is doing the same thing. The only difference is Microsoft is practically a monopoly in the computer operating system market while Verizon is more like an oligopoly.
Can anyone tell me how to get the new ROM for the Omnia that unlocks the GPS?
gps worked perfectly for me on alltel touch diamond … a week ago it seemingly was blocked after verizon had fully taken over alltel here in ohio … i finally went in and inquired as to why my gps was now blocked and was told by a corporate rep that verizon wanted to have people pay for their navigation services and did indeed block 3rd party apps … he noticed that i had been with them for years and had currently 2 of my 5 lines on an open contract … i did not sign up for renewing with them and said i was very upset at this blocking practice … actually called the verizon company a bunch of dirty bastards for this rude treatment of their loyal customers … said with a smile and never directed that comment directly toward the rep but just the higher ups above him … then i left the store … a few hours later i tried the gps on google maps as well as my tt7 app and both fired up perfectly in less than 20 seconds within my home … what is up with that? does that mean they can pick and choose who gets theirs unlocked? i have no idea … still amazed at that …
Somebody should put together a list of all of these phones and the cell carriers that have the GPS locked. It would be a good public service to people out there looking for a new phone and want to use one of these third party services.
For anyone looking hard enough, there are always ways to get your GPS working one way or another, despite what Verizon wishes.
http://forums.crackberry.com/showthread.php?t=192999
The same thing seems to be happening on the Palm Pre Plus. I just got one and the GPS does not report accurate location information unless you open VZ Navigator and decline the “for pay” service. After doing this Google Maps will work fine and report accurate location data. But, if the phone sleeps for more than say 30 minutes I have to repeat the process again.
Seems pretty shady to me.