<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toshiba packs 100 GB of storage in a 1.8-inch drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/toshiba_packs_1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/toshiba_packs_1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Christian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/toshiba_packs_1/#comment-49520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/toshiba_packs_1#comment-49520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        A closer look at the specs, the new Toshiba uses 0.003 W/GB while the old MK8007GAH (80 GB) uses 0.00375 W/GB. Since the press release explicitly mentions this lower consuption we have to assume that its better than their previous drives. This should hopefully bring it at around Hitachi specs on power consuption but also faster. Interesting to see the first UMPC upgrades with this drive. :)
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A closer look at the specs, the new Toshiba uses 0.003 W/GB while the old MK8007GAH (80 GB) uses 0.00375 W/GB. Since the press release explicitly mentions this lower consuption we have to assume that its better than their previous drives. This should hopefully bring it at around Hitachi specs on power consuption but also faster. Interesting to see the first UMPC upgrades with this drive. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Christian</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/toshiba_packs_1/#comment-49521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/toshiba_packs_1#comment-49521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current Toshiba drives consume more power than the Hitachi drives, which is probably a reason for why you find Hitachi drives in Samsung Q1, but at the same time Toshiba drives are a bit faster than Hitachi. This new drive I am unsure about though.

Will be intersting to see if Samsung will release any 1.8&quot; inch harddrives next year or if they have focused their efforts on the new SSD drives - which are brilliant if they just come down in price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current Toshiba drives consume more power than the Hitachi drives, which is probably a reason for why you find Hitachi drives in Samsung Q1, but at the same time Toshiba drives are a bit faster than Hitachi. This new drive I am unsure about though.</p>
<p>Will be intersting to see if Samsung will release any 1.8&#8243; inch harddrives next year or if they have focused their efforts on the new SSD drives &#8211; which are brilliant if they just come down in price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/toshiba_packs_1/#comment-49522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/toshiba_packs_1#comment-49522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        It uses their perpendicular storage technology.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It uses their perpendicular storage technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Easton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/toshiba_packs_1/#comment-49523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Easton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/toshiba_packs_1#comment-49523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Poifect for upgrading my eo i7210.  I wasn&#039;t interested in voiding a warranty to upgrade from 60-80GB.  But I very well might for a +40GB upgrade...that is if the price is right.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poifect for upgrading my eo i7210.  I wasn&#8217;t interested in voiding a warranty to upgrade from 60-80GB.  But I very well might for a +40GB upgrade&#8230;that is if the price is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/toshiba_packs_1/#comment-49524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/toshiba_packs_1#comment-49524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

