Comments on: Times Reader looks slick, but Arrington appears unimpressed http://gigaom.com/mobile/times_reader_lo/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: jk http://gigaom.com/mobile/times_reader_lo/#comment-47315 Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:58:53 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo#comment-47315 I think NewStand is excellent and was wondering the same earlier when I first saw this post. NewStand works with many papers, too.

]]> By: Pam http://gigaom.com/mobile/times_reader_lo/#comment-47316 Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:53:16 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo#comment-47316 James,

I’d be interested in your thoughts to the question I posted at the NY Times: How is this different from my ability to download the electronic edition of the NY Times via NewsStand? I do this daily and it works very well. I realize with the Times Reader I could do this for free, but other than that, what are the benefits as you see them? For me, the Times Reader will only be interesting if I can download the full daily paper (or even better, to download particular sections that I read as I do now).

Thanks,

]]> By: Microsoft Times Reader impresses blog folks http://gigaom.com/mobile/times_reader_lo/#comment-47317 Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:16:45 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/31/times_reader_lo#comment-47317

]]>