<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tablet PC2 review- HP tx1000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/#comment-405089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Callie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/tablet_pc2_revi#comment-405089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;A typically thorough review&quot;? &quot;A good review&quot;? Don&#039;t think so! She lifts whole paragraphs from the press materials and intersperses some admittedly accurate hands-on observations with spiels of marketing-speak, and the mixed formatting and haphazard on the page is incredibly amateur! I would NOT make a purchasing decision based on such an amateur effort.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, is she&#039;d done the least bit of research she&#039;d realize that the tx1000 uses PDA-style passive recognition technology rather than true Tablet-style active technology. The digitizer is basically a super-sized version of what you get on an iPAQ, so it&#039;s cheaper but also less accurate than a regular Tablet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>&#8220;A typically thorough review&#8221;? &#8220;A good review&#8221;? Don&#8217;t think so! She lifts whole paragraphs from the press materials and intersperses some admittedly accurate hands-on observations with spiels of marketing-speak, and the mixed formatting and haphazard on the page is incredibly amateur! I would NOT make a purchasing decision based on such an amateur effort.</p>
<p>Also, is she&#8217;d done the least bit of research she&#8217;d realize that the tx1000 uses PDA-style passive recognition technology rather than true Tablet-style active technology. The digitizer is basically a super-sized version of what you get on an iPAQ, so it&#8217;s cheaper but also less accurate than a regular Tablet.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorie Ghamy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/#comment-405090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorie Ghamy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/tablet_pc2_revi#comment-405090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello dears&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What about screen : plastic or glass like my old TC1000 ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Hello dears</p>
<p>What about screen : plastic or glass like my old TC1000 ?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/#comment-405091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/tablet_pc2_revi#comment-405091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hey Y&#039;all,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Aaron: Yeah, it was a bummer, but I guess it was to be expected: they were marketing this as a laptop with a touch interface...and the digitizer is fine for just tapping on things...but the digitizer is way too insensitive for inking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Scoobie: Yup, and that&#039;s why I bought its bigger, non-tablet brother, the DV6000 instead...that, and the wobbly screen plus the fact that the digitizer created a haze over the screen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nikoo: I didn&#039;t get to test that out in person, since I couldn&#039;t find any way to calibrate or adjust the settings of the digitizer during my quick play...though I think the inking experience is also affected by the glossy coating of the screen - for the amount of weight you had to use on the screen, the stylus tip tended to &#039;catch&#039; on the said coating.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;John: Probably nothing active, maybe just through using a relatively insensitive digitizer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Hey Y&#8217;all,</p>
<p>Aaron: Yeah, it was a bummer, but I guess it was to be expected: they were marketing this as a laptop with a touch interface&#8230;and the digitizer is fine for just tapping on things&#8230;but the digitizer is way too insensitive for inking.</p>
<p>Scoobie: Yup, and that&#8217;s why I bought its bigger, non-tablet brother, the DV6000 instead&#8230;that, and the wobbly screen plus the fact that the digitizer created a haze over the screen.</p>
<p>Nikoo: I didn&#8217;t get to test that out in person, since I couldn&#8217;t find any way to calibrate or adjust the settings of the digitizer during my quick play&#8230;though I think the inking experience is also affected by the glossy coating of the screen &#8211; for the amount of weight you had to use on the screen, the stylus tip tended to &#8216;catch&#8217; on the said coating.</p>
<p>John: Probably nothing active, maybe just through using a relatively insensitive digitizer.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnNull</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/#comment-405092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnNull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/tablet_pc2_revi#comment-405092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;My biggest question is about the palm rejection during inking. Does anyone know if it has such a thing?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>My biggest question is about the palm rejection during inking. Does anyone know if it has such a thing?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikoooo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/#comment-405093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikoooo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/tablet_pc2_revi#comment-405093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am looking forward! Could you please investigate something? it is said in the forum of tabletPC review that the touchscreen is terrible at first, but after a few days of testing, recalibration in both orientations, everything smoothes up and it becomes really confortable.&lt;br /&gt;
The &quot;long&quot; thread is here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.tabletpcreview.com/showthread.php?t=5802&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forum.tabletpcreview.com/showthread.php?t=5802&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Else it seems that the battery is poor. What&#039;s your feeling about this point?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the good job so far ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I am looking forward! Could you please investigate something? it is said in the forum of tabletPC review that the touchscreen is terrible at first, but after a few days of testing, recalibration in both orientations, everything smoothes up and it becomes really confortable.<br />
The &#8220;long&#8221; thread is here: <a href="http://forum.tabletpcreview.com/showthread.php?t=5802" rel="nofollow">http://forum.tabletpcreview.com/showthread.php?t=5802</a><br />
Else it seems that the battery is poor. What&#8217;s your feeling about this point?</p>
<p>Thanks for the good job so far ;-)
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoobie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/#comment-405094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scoobie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/tablet_pc2_revi#comment-405094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;My inking experience in store a couple of times on the HP TX has been awful. Ruled it out completely as a result&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>My inking experience in store a couple of times on the HP TX has been awful. Ruled it out completely as a result</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Walker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/tablet_pc2_revi/#comment-405095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Walker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/tablet_pc2_revi#comment-405095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;They gave it high marks except in the main area, the inking experience; saying it was the one weak link in an otherwise great device.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kinda defeats the whole purpose of a tablet pc that they say fails miserably in the inking/note taking department. Might as well get a traditional laptop after reading the review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>They gave it high marks except in the main area, the inking experience; saying it was the one weak link in an otherwise great device.</p>
<p>Kinda defeats the whole purpose of a tablet pc that they say fails miserably in the inking/note taking department. Might as well get a traditional laptop after reading the review.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

