<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint&#8217;s EV-DO &#8220;Rev-A-lution&#8221; continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan A. Reiter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/#comment-49739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan A. Reiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/12/sprints_evdo_re#comment-49739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just received a Sierra Wireless AirCard to test Sprint&#039;s Rev. A upgrade.  (I&#039;m a wireless data consultant so I have this as an evaluation unit for a few weeks.)

I&#039;m using a year-old IBM/Lenovo Tablet PC with Windows XP and 1.5GB of RAM.

Here in Chevy Chase, Md. (about a mile north of northwest Washington, D.C.), I&#039;m finding that Rev. A downloads are in the 500sKbps - low 700sKbps.  They vary widely, however (mostly somewhat slower).

The Rev. A downloads don&#039;t seem much different than Rev. 0.  That might be normal because Rev. A isn&#039;t supposed to be much faster for downloads.  But I haven&#039;t found any significant difference between the download rates of Rev. A and Rev. 0, and I probably should see a small, but consistent increase in the speed of A compared to 0.

Uploads, however, are ** dramatically ** faster than Rev. 0.  I&#039;m getting data rates of 400sKbps - high 500sKbps. Yes, there are wide variations, but the upload speeds are consistently and significantly higher than Rev. 0.

When using a Sprint LG Fusic Rev. 0 phone connected to my Tablet PC via a cable, I get upload data rates in the 120sKbps - 130sKbps -- and that&#039;s pretty normal for Rev. 0.  (Yes, I know, using a phone + cable compared to a PC Card isn&#039;t an exact comparison.  But I don&#039;t have a Sprint Rev. 0 PC Card.)

Perhaps Sprint needs to tweak the Rev. A download speeds a bit, at least in my area, to boost them.

I tested the data rates using multiple sites   listed on DSL Reports (East and West Coasts) as well as using speedtest.net.  

Interestingly, speedtest.net was the only site to NOT register any increase in the Rev. A upload speeds; they were about the same as measured for Rev. 0.  All the sites on DSL Reports showed the much higher upload data rates, so I am assuming that there might be a problem with speedtest.

Also, a first set of tests I conducted were with the software supplied on Sprint&#039;s CD.  I then checked for a software upgrade, and there was indeed a more recent version.  This recent version made a significant difference in the data rates.  Both the upload and download speeds are faster.

I realize my tests are relatively unscientific, but I think they might be relatively accurate.

Anyone have a more accurate way to test data rates?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just received a Sierra Wireless AirCard to test Sprint&#8217;s Rev. A upgrade.  (I&#8217;m a wireless data consultant so I have this as an evaluation unit for a few weeks.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using a year-old IBM/Lenovo Tablet PC with Windows XP and 1.5GB of RAM.</p>
<p>Here in Chevy Chase, Md. (about a mile north of northwest Washington, D.C.), I&#8217;m finding that Rev. A downloads are in the 500sKbps &#8211; low 700sKbps.  They vary widely, however (mostly somewhat slower).</p>
<p>The Rev. A downloads don&#8217;t seem much different than Rev. 0.  That might be normal because Rev. A isn&#8217;t supposed to be much faster for downloads.  But I haven&#8217;t found any significant difference between the download rates of Rev. A and Rev. 0, and I probably should see a small, but consistent increase in the speed of A compared to 0.</p>
<p>Uploads, however, are ** dramatically ** faster than Rev. 0.  I&#8217;m getting data rates of 400sKbps &#8211; high 500sKbps. Yes, there are wide variations, but the upload speeds are consistently and significantly higher than Rev. 0.</p>
<p>When using a Sprint LG Fusic Rev. 0 phone connected to my Tablet PC via a cable, I get upload data rates in the 120sKbps &#8211; 130sKbps &#8212; and that&#8217;s pretty normal for Rev. 0.  (Yes, I know, using a phone + cable compared to a PC Card isn&#8217;t an exact comparison.  But I don&#8217;t have a Sprint Rev. 0 PC Card.)</p>
<p>Perhaps Sprint needs to tweak the Rev. A download speeds a bit, at least in my area, to boost them.</p>
<p>I tested the data rates using multiple sites   listed on DSL Reports (East and West Coasts) as well as using speedtest.net.  </p>
<p>Interestingly, speedtest.net was the only site to NOT register any increase in the Rev. A upload speeds; they were about the same as measured for Rev. 0.  All the sites on DSL Reports showed the much higher upload data rates, so I am assuming that there might be a problem with speedtest.</p>
<p>Also, a first set of tests I conducted were with the software supplied on Sprint&#8217;s CD.  I then checked for a software upgrade, and there was indeed a more recent version.  This recent version made a significant difference in the data rates.  Both the upload and download speeds are faster.</p>
<p>I realize my tests are relatively unscientific, but I think they might be relatively accurate.</p>
<p>Anyone have a more accurate way to test data rates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Chapman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/#comment-49740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobby Chapman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/12/sprints_evdo_re#comment-49740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        I&#039;m not sure why we repeatedly release devices without wider area coverage, but the devices themselves tend to work exceptionally well for those that can actually use them. 
-Bobby Chapman
unofficial comment from a Sprint Employee(CRC)
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why we repeatedly release devices without wider area coverage, but the devices themselves tend to work exceptionally well for those that can actually use them.<br />
-Bobby Chapman<br />
unofficial comment from a Sprint Employee(CRC)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/#comment-49741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/12/sprints_evdo_re#comment-49741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        That card won&#039;t work with most 3G data cards because it&#039;s only a 16-bit card. The product description states: &quot;Note that this is only for use with PCMCIA memory card and hard disk card devices. It is not designed for use with wireless data or GSM/GPRS cards.&quot; I personally don&#039;t need a PC Card slot in my UMPC, but other folks could definitely use it. I also think that PC Card modems are on the way out in favor of USB and ExpressCard. Thanks!
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That card won&#8217;t work with most 3G data cards because it&#8217;s only a 16-bit card. The product description states: &#8220;Note that this is only for use with PCMCIA memory card and hard disk card devices. It is not designed for use with wireless data or GSM/GPRS cards.&#8221; I personally don&#8217;t need a PC Card slot in my UMPC, but other folks could definitely use it. I also think that PC Card modems are on the way out in favor of USB and ExpressCard. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michlangelo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/#comment-49742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michlangelo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/12/sprints_evdo_re#comment-49742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kevin,

In the last mobile tech podcast, you seemed implicitly regretting the lack of a PC card slot on sammy -to be able to connect to new gen mobile networks, did you tried one of the CF-PCMCI adapters available on the market? ( for example &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/ORA-Memory-PCMCIA-Card-Adaptor/dp/B000A0BZ8Q?tag=pccounselor-20/sr=1-5/qid=1162559157/ref=sr_1_5/102-7355481-6304930?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.amazon.com/ORA-Memory-PCMCIA-Card-Adaptor/dp/B000A0BZ8Q?tag=pccounselor-20/sr=1-5/qid=1162559157/ref=sr_1_5/102-7355481-6304930?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics)&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>In the last mobile tech podcast, you seemed implicitly regretting the lack of a PC card slot on sammy -to be able to connect to new gen mobile networks, did you tried one of the CF-PCMCI adapters available on the market? ( for example <a href="http://www.amazon.com/ORA-Memory-PCMCIA-Card-Adaptor/dp/B000A0BZ8Q?tag=pccounselor-20/sr=1-5/qid=1162559157/ref=sr_1_5/102-7355481-6304930?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/ORA-Memory-PCMCIA-Card-Adaptor/dp/B000A0BZ8Q?tag=pccounselor-20/sr=1-5/qid=1162559157/ref=sr_1_5/102-7355481-6304930?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/ORA-Memory-PCMCIA-Card-Adaptor/dp/B000A0BZ8Q?tag=pccounselor-20/sr=1-5/qid=1162559157/ref=sr_1_5/102-7355481-6304930?ie=UTF8&#038;s=electronics</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuzMe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/#comment-49743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JuzMe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/12/sprints_evdo_re#comment-49743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sigh. How did they manage to bypass the nation&#039;s 3rd largest market, Chicago, AGAIN...

?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh. How did they manage to bypass the nation&#8217;s 3rd largest market, Chicago, AGAIN&#8230;</p>
<p>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JefffGr</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/#comment-49744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JefffGr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/12/sprints_evdo_re#comment-49744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        The Los Angeles coverage totally omits the San Fernando Valley, so I definitely don&#039;t see any rush on this...

      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Los Angeles coverage totally omits the San Fernando Valley, so I definitely don&#8217;t see any rush on this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/#comment-49745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Zatz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/12/sprints_evdo_re#comment-49745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The area they describe for DC is huge - it&#039;s really well beyond the metropolitan areas and out to the exurbs (and further in some cases). Nice! 

Though the two year contracts all these guys want it most definitely NOT nice. I don&#039;t like commitment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The area they describe for DC is huge &#8211; it&#8217;s really well beyond the metropolitan areas and out to the exurbs (and further in some cases). Nice! </p>
<p>Though the two year contracts all these guys want it most definitely NOT nice. I don&#8217;t like commitment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/sprints_evdo_re/#comment-49746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/12/12/sprints_evdo_re#comment-49746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

