>>>My Fujitsu P1610 has an 8.9-inch screen versus the 7-inch screen of the Shift, so I estimate the P1610 is at least an inch wider. This means that the keyboard on the Fujitsu is at least an inch wider and I find I can just barely touch type on the P1610. I question if I could touch type at all on the narrower Shift keyboard.

Go ahead, spoil my Shift fantasy. Next you’ll tell me Fake Steve Jobs is some Suit who works for Forbes…

I wouldn’t have a problem if the alternative of a detachable keyboard was more common. That way everybody gets what they want; a slate for the lightest and slimmest possible device, and a keyboard worth typing on.

I touch-type and using a chicklet or thumb-board is, for me, as much slower than my normal typing speed as handwriting. I can definitely see James’ point that a bad keyboard is worse than none at all. (By adding weight and bulk and cost to a device that’s supposed to be light and mobile and affordable, without adding enough additional function to be worth the burden.) And I’ll throw in a grumble at the mainstream media types for their keyboard-kvetching while I’m at it.

Related to the point peejay brings up, I’m afraid that this move will make UMPCs uncompetitive with thin-and-light notebooks which cost less for the same horsepower and have fully-functional keyboards.

I like my Q1; I carry it with me pretty much everywhere, and it’s so useful under circumstances I’d never be able to use a laptop. If I need a keyboard I use an external one (I shelled out for a ThinkOutside model that fits in a shirt pocket, but any BT or USB model will do) that supports my touchtyping fully. If I don’t, or can’t (say, use while standing), the slate works fine for me.

I just hope that some day I’ll be able to find a successor to this, and that others can see how well this concept can work.

— Steve

I’d be very surprised if the entire UMPC market moved to have keyboards. I’m sure there’ll always be a choice.

Look at laptops and tablet PCs – you can buy either, can’t you? The fact that most people want a keyboard (a laptop) doesn’t stop the market also providing machines without for people that want them.

The irony is that I kept my Psion 5 for years because I was looking for a machine with a keyboard – but nothing existed. I didn’t have that choice! Things are improving now.

Amtek T770 – A recent slate UMPCs. Kidc slate. Q1 and Q1U (10 different versions), R2H Pentium, There are choices.

Remember that slate stuff isn’t going to be as popular because of that ‘leap’ that Valto just mentioned but the choice seems to be there.

What we’re seeing is marketing going on here and I believe that the ratio of device with real keyboards, thumb keyboards and no keyboards represents pretty closely the split of user requirements across the market. Quality can always improve but I think its a good selection of devices right now.

Steve

It so funny to see this issue being so popular topic, that also makes it good to write about. My opinions are clear. All users need options to choose from, So it’s good that there are so many OEM’s involved trying to offer different kind of solutions for keyboard. Anyhow from sales point of view Keyboard is a must for getting new customers, maybe after they have bought their first unit and learned the benefits of touch screen etc. they may choose their second device to be without keyboard, but to take that leap of faith, is asking quite a lot from the average Joe…

Another thing that got me curious, was that how many of the average computer user actually touch-type? But rather Hunt-and-Peck? For them (like me) having keyboard being able to touch type makes no since at all, why would I need “big” keyboard if I don’t touch type – I bet there are more average computer users that Hunt-and-Peck than that touch types. I did go further to study this, since it was taking too much time, so I don’t have facts to support. But I did find this from Wiki about words per minute.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Words_per_minute

One thing is interesting, average typing speed is almost the same as handwriting speed…. So let the arguing continue ;)

I wonder, since I “hunt-and-peck” Can I type faster with smaller keyboard, since my fingers travel shorter distance ;)

HTC Shift is a KILLER device!

I’m happy there are choices as well but I follow James’ concern with them going all keyboard all the time.

The original point is lost. The Origami was supposed to be a slate style device which I am happy with in a small form factor. It was supposed to be used primarily for inking according to Microsoft’s specs. Now, I fear, OEM’s have gotten away from that and further confused the market.

I specifically wanted a smaller, lighter tablet that was cheaper than a convertible. I knew coming in there were options for keyboards if I wanted but the primary concern was smaller, lighter, cheaper. Not something currently possible if OEMs keep putting keyboards on a UMPC.

I’m using a Tabletkiosk v7110 with a Stowaway bluetooth keyboard. It’s there when I need it but when I don’t, I don’t have to be bothered. And I find for the usage scenarios of my UMPC, I only reach for it about 30% of the time because I am away from my desktop and need to get some lengthy writing done. Which is the point of not wanting an imbedded keyboard in the first place since I am only away from a desktop on rare occassions.

What made me fall in love with and save for my UMPC was the original Origami specs with the option of a keyboard like the original Q1. That was a great idea.

Now, like James said, we who liked the original Origami idea may soon not have that choice as more come with mandatory keyboards adding weight, bulk and price.

OK James. So you point is that you want either a perfect thumb or perfect ‘real’ keyboard and you think that the U1010 keyboard would be too small.

Well there are certainly some crap keyboards around (Medion/Gigabyte, UX) thats for sure but dont forget design limitations.
Thumboard means 4″ screen (unless you use the T-swivel screen model) and full keyboard starts with 9″ devices. (Actually 10 – See Palm Foleo)
Do you think all 5-8″ devices shouldn’t have a keyboard? Or do you just think that the in-between keybaord designs are bad?

As for choice – things have never been so good. Thats what UMPCs are all about. We have 7″ devices with real keyboards now (nanobook, eeepc, kohjinsha, shift) and new sliders like the MIMD, U560 and shift (again.)

One of my fave designs is one with a removeable
keyboard (The Carrypad spec) but I’m very happy that there’s other choices out there.

Steve

Sure, this will all change when Apple comes out with their own UMPC with, of course, an on screen touch keyboard. Will they? Won’t they?

I have the same feeling as James. I myself using the U750P. Same reasons why I still can’t upgrade to a newer UMPC. MOst NEW UMPCs are running A1cc processor and my old U750P is on Pentium M (I dont know if you can call it an UPGRADE if I change my U750P to buy a A1xx UMPC device running 800MHz or 900MHz) and another option is the KEYBOARD, where new UMPCs are with little KEYBOARD that is very hard to INPUT/TYPE and using the ON-SCREEN keyboard is faster rather than using the built-in KB. My U750P comes with a very good folded-keyboard that seldom I use. I only use when typing longer documents in WORD or EXCELL. Which cannot be easily done on Built-in keyboards in new UMPC devices. Same with JK ” I just want to get my work done in a comfortable and efficient manner”.

- For my upgrade, I dont worry much on the keyboard, I can always use an external one but what really keeps me on-hold is the speed of the current UMPCS available in the market.. -

My main point is all about choice, and we seem to be losing it. Some like little keyboards, some don’t find them very useful and that’s all good, it’s about choice. But if all UMPCs come with little keyboards then the choice is lost. I use thumb keyboards all the time on my phone and the Advantage, but I don’t want a bigger device with a sub-par keyboard. Sure I would use it occasionally but give me the choice.