<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smartbook- Another Trademark Fight Coming?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/#comment-419501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=36940#comment-419501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qYUijnm_QA&amp;feature=related

Bare in mind this device came out in 2003 and uses a StrongArm 206Mhz.  And it considerablly outperformaing an Elonex 1T]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/2qYUijnm_QA/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
<p>Bare in mind this device came out in 2003 and uses a StrongArm 206Mhz.  And it considerablly outperformaing an Elonex 1T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/#comment-419500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=36940#comment-419500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartbook G138 was made by Book Digital.

Book Digital was the ODM for Zupra and a few others.

There is also a german Laptop manufacturer called Smartbook.

John

PS just in case the Smartbook G138 is ARM based, runs CE, has built in GPRS so prety similar.  But maybe trademark is not active. Or maybe not in the US]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smartbook G138 was made by Book Digital.</p>
<p>Book Digital was the ODM for Zupra and a few others.</p>
<p>There is also a german Laptop manufacturer called Smartbook.</p>
<p>John</p>
<p>PS just in case the Smartbook G138 is ARM based, runs CE, has built in GPRS so prety similar.  But maybe trademark is not active. Or maybe not in the US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Johnston</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/#comment-419499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Johnston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=36940#comment-419499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I&#039;ve already checked this out (none of them appear to be applicable) that&#039;s not to say that &quot;smartbook&quot; is a sensible name to adopt, nor that it hasn&#039;t been registered in some other country and will float to the surface via Madrid Protocol over the coming 6 months.

Netbook is fine, it&#039;s not a loaded term (&quot;smart&quot;book? how &quot;smart&quot;? &quot;smart&quot;phone is just as bad), and pretty much everyone now knows what it means.

Sam]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;ve already checked this out (none of them appear to be applicable) that&#8217;s not to say that &#8220;smartbook&#8221; is a sensible name to adopt, nor that it hasn&#8217;t been registered in some other country and will float to the surface via Madrid Protocol over the coming 6 months.</p>
<p>Netbook is fine, it&#8217;s not a loaded term (&#8220;smart&#8221;book? how &#8220;smart&#8221;? &#8220;smart&#8221;phone is just as bad), and pretty much everyone now knows what it means.</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HereAndNow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/#comment-419498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HereAndNow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=36940#comment-419498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the term &quot;smartbook&quot; does continue to be used, I think it should be reserved for small mobile computers (x86 or ARM) that include all of the typical smartphone hardware (3G, GPS, accelerometer, compass, etc.). This hardware enables &quot;smartphone&quot; functionality like location-based services, cell phone calls, SMS, automatic screen rotation, etc.

People wanting a &quot;notebook-like&quot; computer would get a &quot;netbook&quot; running a desktop OS (Windows,Ubuntu,...). People wanting a &quot;smartphone-like&quot; computer, would get a &quot;smartbook&quot; running a smartphone OS (Android,Symbian,WinMo,...).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the term &#8220;smartbook&#8221; does continue to be used, I think it should be reserved for small mobile computers (x86 or ARM) that include all of the typical smartphone hardware (3G, GPS, accelerometer, compass, etc.). This hardware enables &#8220;smartphone&#8221; functionality like location-based services, cell phone calls, SMS, automatic screen rotation, etc.</p>
<p>People wanting a &#8220;notebook-like&#8221; computer would get a &#8220;netbook&#8221; running a desktop OS (Windows,Ubuntu,&#8230;). People wanting a &#8220;smartphone-like&#8221; computer, would get a &#8220;smartbook&#8221; running a smartphone OS (Android,Symbian,WinMo,&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZSX</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/#comment-419497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZSX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=36940#comment-419497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I forgot to mention the other Windows CE Smartbook, the Book Digital Smartbook G138.

http://www.hpcfactor.com/reviews/hardware/bookdigital/smartbook-g138/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention the other Windows CE Smartbook, the Book Digital Smartbook G138.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hpcfactor.com/reviews/hardware/bookdigital/smartbook-g138/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hpcfactor.com/reviews/hardware/bookdigital/smartbook-g138/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZSX</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/#comment-419496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZSX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=36940#comment-419496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is already a device called the Zupera Smartbook. Ironically, it is also running Windows CE, like the Psion Netbook.

http://www.windowsfordevices.com/articles/AT9773759623.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is already a device called the Zupera Smartbook. Ironically, it is also running Windows CE, like the Psion Netbook.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.windowsfordevices.com/articles/AT9773759623.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.windowsfordevices.com/articles/AT9773759623.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/smartbook-another-trademark-fight-coming/#comment-419495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=36940#comment-419495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if there are already 10 &quot;live&quot; trademarks, what&#039;s one more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if there are already 10 &#8220;live&#8221; trademarks, what&#8217;s one more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

