Comments on: Six month sentence for having a camera phone in court

By: JT

JT — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:34:06 +0000

I have been hunting for months for a Bluetooth phone that doesn’t have a freakin’ camera! Sony Ericsson made one some time ago called a T68i, but they’re no longer supported by S.E., and they were NEVER supported by my cell provider (Cingular). I cannot have a camera phone where I work (it would be confiscated) and I have many friends that are attorneys, judges, etc. that cannot have a camera phone at work. One would think that the manufacturers would stop pandering to the teeny-bopper crowd, who all think cell phones are toys, and start paying attention to the businesspeople out there (you know, the people with jobs and disposable income for cell service and technology). Just my two cents.

By: Lactoso

Lactoso — Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:26:30 +0000

Most major phone manufacturers are offering sans-camera models of their phones due to the overwhelming demand from the business sector for cameraless phones. All kind of silly if you ask me. I almost got homelandsecuritied at the airport when I tried to use my cameraphone to take a picture of this inane video they had at the security checkpoint (“It is prohibited to possess or TALK ABOUT the following items…” and the vid went on to show PowerPoint type images of an AK-47, a stack of dynamite with a timer, etc..). But that, obviously, is a different issue altogether.

Love the blog,
Lactoso the Intolerant
http://lactoso.blogspot.com

By: Camera Cingular

Camera Cingular — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:58:01 +0000

By: Alaska Court System

Alaska Court System — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:58:01 +0000