<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Q1 Ultra review: Windows Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-q1-ul-2-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-q1-ul-2-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:36:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluespapa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-q1-ul-2-2/#comment-395433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluespapa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/samsung-q1-ul-2-2#comment-395433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can understand B&#039;s concern, but even if &quot;touch&quot; means poking with a stylus on the go, there&#039;s still no real integrated UI, no innovation beyond launching applications with Origami (well, okay, listening to music).  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s frustrating to see so little innovation in ordinary functions, when they&#039;ve done such a magnificent job of handwriting recognition which, with voice recognition, should be the hardest part.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe the MID revolution, like smart phones or something, will push things in that direction.   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I can understand B&#8217;s concern, but even if &#8220;touch&#8221; means poking with a stylus on the go, there&#8217;s still no real integrated UI, no innovation beyond launching applications with Origami (well, okay, listening to music).  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s frustrating to see so little innovation in ordinary functions, when they&#8217;ve done such a magnificent job of handwriting recognition which, with voice recognition, should be the hardest part.  </p>
<p>Maybe the MID revolution, like smart phones or something, will push things in that direction.   </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-q1-ul-2-2/#comment-395434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/samsung-q1-ul-2-2#comment-395434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;d say the number one obstacle against more touch applications is smudging.  Personally I can&#039;t stand any sort of smudge or mark on my devices.  Touching screens with your fingers is bound to leave a smudge, and touchscreen computing won&#039;t be taken seriously until they develop a smudgeless screen.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;d say the number one obstacle against more touch applications is smudging.  Personally I can&#8217;t stand any sort of smudge or mark on my devices.  Touching screens with your fingers is bound to leave a smudge, and touchscreen computing won&#8217;t be taken seriously until they develop a smudgeless screen.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

