<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung NC10 netbook reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: best notebooks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[best notebooks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved this note book. The look is great. The revolutionary 1.6HHz processor enables easy internet browsing and compatibility with all your Windows-based applications. 1GB of RAM delivers maximum performance for everything you need to accomplish. I love this laptop. It give a great performance.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved this note book. The look is great. The revolutionary 1.6HHz processor enables easy internet browsing and compatibility with all your Windows-based applications. 1GB of RAM delivers maximum performance for everything you need to accomplish. I love this laptop. It give a great performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Does it not have an led screen?
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Does it not have an led screen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CrimDah,

isnt that what nits are (i have no clue)?


oh ya guys, take your time measuring battery life tests. theres no need to hurry as we all know that you actually live through it the entire amount of time. you cant just guesstimate what the times &quot;would be&quot; based on partial run down tests like other industies can with their products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CrimDah,</p>
<p>isnt that what nits are (i have no clue)?</p>
<p>oh ya guys, take your time measuring battery life tests. theres no need to hurry as we all know that you actually live through it the entire amount of time. you cant just guesstimate what the times &#8220;would be&#8221; based on partial run down tests like other industies can with their products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrimDah</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CrimDah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i like LAPTOP mag, everything from the text reviews, video reviews, video upgrades. but come on, you guys REALLY should have known something was wrong when it ran for 7.5hrs &amp; not gone to &quot;print&quot; yet.

although i do agree that it will still probably turn out to be the best 10&quot; netbook yet because of the keyboard alone, even if it gets the typical 5-6hr mark.

the design is fugly by the way. the way the body tries to be slim but the ports buldge out &amp; the horrible silver strip down the side.


**on a side note something i really hate. why do ALL of these review sites always use scenario&#039;s like &quot;we used 50% brightness&quot;? dont they  know that 1 machines 50% is not the same as anothers 50%? they could still have completely different brightness &amp; power consumption levels. there really needs to be some sort of scientific brightness level measurement tool. then all machines could be at the same brightness level (whether it be 3 bars, 7 bars, etc) &amp; then test battery life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like LAPTOP mag, everything from the text reviews, video reviews, video upgrades. but come on, you guys REALLY should have known something was wrong when it ran for 7.5hrs &amp; not gone to &#8220;print&#8221; yet.</p>
<p>although i do agree that it will still probably turn out to be the best 10&#8243; netbook yet because of the keyboard alone, even if it gets the typical 5-6hr mark.</p>
<p>the design is fugly by the way. the way the body tries to be slim but the ports buldge out &amp; the horrible silver strip down the side.</p>
<p>**on a side note something i really hate. why do ALL of these review sites always use scenario&#8217;s like &#8220;we used 50% brightness&#8221;? dont they  know that 1 machines 50% is not the same as anothers 50%? they could still have completely different brightness &amp; power consumption levels. there really needs to be some sort of scientific brightness level measurement tool. then all machines could be at the same brightness level (whether it be 3 bars, 7 bars, etc) &amp; then test battery life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeoteriX</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoteriX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Another question for the LaptopMag reviewers--it is unclear why given the glowing commentary on the review, the NC10 only garnered 4/5 stars?
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Another question for the LaptopMag reviewers&#8211;it is unclear why given the glowing commentary on the review, the NC10 only garnered 4/5 stars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeoteriX</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoteriX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        My girlfriend with the 6 cell MSI Wind gets just about 5 hours with the LCD turned all the way down, and bluetooth off.  I&#039;d say the NC10 is still performing well by comparison.  50% brightness should be more than enough.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        My girlfriend with the 6 cell MSI Wind gets just about 5 hours with the LCD turned all the way down, and bluetooth off.  I&#8217;d say the NC10 is still performing well by comparison.  50% brightness should be more than enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avram Piltch</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avram Piltch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greetings from LAPTOP. We plan to run the test a second time at 50% brightness to see if we get the same 7 and a half hours of life. I think it&#039;s no surprise that there would be a huge delta between the max brightness and 50% brightness result. 

To confirm the results, we&#039;re going to run the test at 50% brightness again and report back. 

Typically, we run our battery test at 40% brightness, but in XP you can&#039;t usually set an exact percentage, unless there are 10 green bars on the brightness menu and you lower the brightness to number four. Our NC10 has only 8 brightness levels so we went with number four.

As an aside, we are looking to make our battery test downloadable so anyone can use it to verify our results on any notebook we&#039;ve tested or to conduct new tests of their own. We just need to get certain permissions, because we want to distribute all the elements in one easy-to-install package.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings from LAPTOP. We plan to run the test a second time at 50% brightness to see if we get the same 7 and a half hours of life. I think it&#8217;s no surprise that there would be a huge delta between the max brightness and 50% brightness result. </p>
<p>To confirm the results, we&#8217;re going to run the test at 50% brightness again and report back. </p>
<p>Typically, we run our battery test at 40% brightness, but in XP you can&#8217;t usually set an exact percentage, unless there are 10 green bars on the brightness menu and you lower the brightness to number four. Our NC10 has only 8 brightness levels so we went with number four.</p>
<p>As an aside, we are looking to make our battery test downloadable so anyone can use it to verify our results on any notebook we&#8217;ve tested or to conduct new tests of their own. We just need to get certain permissions, because we want to distribute all the elements in one easy-to-install package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Does this also mean that at 50% brightness you at least get 6 hours instead of the 7.5 hours mentioned.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Does this also mean that at 50% brightness you at least get 6 hours instead of the 7.5 hours mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JStern</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JStern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        We re-ran the test and got 4:48 with the brightness cranked up...The review has been updated.

      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        We re-ran the test and got 4:48 with the brightness cranked up&#8230;The review has been updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrickLaquer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/samsung-nc10-ne/#comment-362771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BrickLaquer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/samsung-nc10-ne#comment-362771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if this thing gets 7.5hrs then i can fly! even the $3,000 Sony Vaoi&#039;s &amp; Fujitsu Lifebooks of the world dont get that much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this thing gets 7.5hrs then i can fly! even the $3,000 Sony Vaoi&#8217;s &amp; Fujitsu Lifebooks of the world dont get that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

