<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Runcore SSD offers low-cost speed for netbooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiteCharts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/#comment-361863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SiteCharts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/runcore-ssd-off#comment-361863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[too bad Dell, Asus, etc. use proprietary mini-pcie slots. the pins differ from standard mini-pcie slots, making it impossible to use these SSDs in normal laptops.
The fact that they are MLC is disturbing though. Is that max read/write speeds? because MLC random writes svck! I just returned the Patriot Warp 2 64GB SSD because it was slower than a 5,400rpm drive in real world usage.

I have an open mini-pcie slot on my lenovo x60t. If there was an SSD available for it, I would already have my credit card out ... ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too bad Dell, Asus, etc. use proprietary mini-pcie slots. the pins differ from standard mini-pcie slots, making it impossible to use these SSDs in normal laptops.<br />
The fact that they are MLC is disturbing though. Is that max read/write speeds? because MLC random writes svck! I just returned the Patriot Warp 2 64GB SSD because it was slower than a 5,400rpm drive in real world usage.</p>
<p>I have an open mini-pcie slot on my lenovo x60t. If there was an SSD available for it, I would already have my credit card out &#8230; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/#comment-361864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/runcore-ssd-off#comment-361864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Thanks Kevin!
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kevin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/#comment-361865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/runcore-ssd-off#comment-361865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Scott, the Asus Eee PC 1000HA uses a Seagate 160GB, 5400 RPM drive. Notebook Review tested that drive in the 1000HA (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.notebookreview.com/picture.asp?f=37977)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.notebookreview.com/picture.asp?f=37977)&lt;/a&gt; and saw max throughput of 60Mbps and an average of 48Mbps with 15.7ms access time. Based on that alone, I suspect that the SSD would provide a noticeable boost, but not a tremendous one. That&#039;s just my opinion with the limited information we have so far. Here&#039;s their full review: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4655&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4655&lt;/a&gt;
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, the Asus Eee PC 1000HA uses a Seagate 160GB, 5400 RPM drive. Notebook Review tested that drive in the 1000HA (<a href="http://www.notebookreview.com/picture.asp?f=37977)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.notebookreview.com/picture.asp?f=37977" rel="nofollow">http://www.notebookreview.com/picture.asp?f=37977</a>) and saw max throughput of 60Mbps and an average of 48Mbps with 15.7ms access time. Based on that alone, I suspect that the SSD would provide a noticeable boost, but not a tremendous one. That&#8217;s just my opinion with the limited information we have so far. Here&#8217;s their full review: <a href="http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4655" rel="nofollow">http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4655</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/#comment-361866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/runcore-ssd-off#comment-361866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do those faster speeds compare to the typical netbook HD? 

Is my 1000HA going to see a big boost as well?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do those faster speeds compare to the typical netbook HD? </p>
<p>Is my 1000HA going to see a big boost as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris K</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/#comment-361867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/runcore-ssd-off#comment-361867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it&#039;s that fast with MLC, I&#039;m going to have to assume that it&#039;s using some sort of RAID0-style logic to spread writes and reads across multiple chips.  

... Fundamentally, that&#039;s not going to bother me as much as it probably should.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s that fast with MLC, I&#8217;m going to have to assume that it&#8217;s using some sort of RAID0-style logic to spread writes and reads across multiple chips.  </p>
<p>&#8230; Fundamentally, that&#8217;s not going to bother me as much as it probably should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/#comment-361868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/runcore-ssd-off#comment-361868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s it. Where&#039;s my credit card?

My Mini 9 is dying for 32 gigs of fast SSD, and at that price, I may just have to make it happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it. Where&#8217;s my credit card?</p>
<p>My Mini 9 is dying for 32 gigs of fast SSD, and at that price, I may just have to make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alslayer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/runcore-ssd-off/#comment-361869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alslayer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/runcore-ssd-off#comment-361869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Neat I want one.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat I want one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

