<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palm Pre Beta Tester Tweets Release Date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: abca</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/#comment-415440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[abca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=32923#comment-415440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sprint really betting big time with the pre, but they didn&#039;t do so well with the instinct when spent $200 million on promoting it.  

Sprint is famous for spending big bucks on advertisements, but i seriously hope they will do well, at least folks at http://www.PalmPreForum.org spent sleepless nights try to find out the lastest and greatest info about the Pre!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sprint really betting big time with the pre, but they didn&#8217;t do so well with the instinct when spent $200 million on promoting it.  </p>
<p>Sprint is famous for spending big bucks on advertisements, but i seriously hope they will do well, at least folks at <a href="http://www.PalmPreForum.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.PalmPreForum.org</a> spent sleepless nights try to find out the lastest and greatest info about the Pre!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/#comment-415439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=32923#comment-415439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This aint hard to figure out folks, a &#039;legit&#039; release date means nothing, as any &#039;delay&#039; notice will be sent out as late as possible.  Why? If they delay now, stock price goes down and available capital decreases to help fund the production push.

Also, the phones will likely be in sprint hands far before us &#039;normals&#039; see them - and once that happens, every loose lipped franchise owner with a friend &#039;higher up&#039; will be yakking about the thing nonstop.

Lastly, the $299 price makes sense: look at the touch pro, its still on the sprint site at 299, despite being available (subsidized on a sprint contract) for as low as $149.  Sprint will kill the pre with horrible pricing tables - all their high end phones run 300-350usd, sith SOME running over that occasionally.

Apple/ATT got the iphone price down by requiring a 3yr contract, once they brought the first gen to market and amortized its development and tooling, they have been able to retain the price moving into the 2nd gen version - which Im sure is a cash COW, as all the major development was already accomplished, and from here on out its software updates.  

Palm cant just give us a phone through sprint and hope to succeed, and most folks must know that they (palm) know this.  I hope they also know that anything over $199 with a contract will KILL sales.  This phone isnt just an iphone competitor or killer - its a different KIND of phone with similar functionality that helps make a business device more fun.  If they try to spin it as an iphone killer it will fail, simply because the price point WILL be higher for some time unless they have extended contracts.  The business user will like the fact that its compact and trendy, but will get turned off if the focus is on glitz and not function.  A mix of both can be appreciated by all users, but to sacrifice use will kill any potential business users.  If the price was reasonably under $300, say near $250-275 it would likely still do very well, but competing with an 8gb iPhone rather than selling the phone &#039;on its own&#039;, the price point must be similar, if not, there has to be a lot to offer above and beyond what the iPhone IS.

I hope palm/sprint get this right, neither company has been able to get the buzz going in their favor for many years, they&#039;re both &#039;ho-hum&#039; companies with the potential to become the next trendy provider/manufacturer, or will both wind up in the &#039;what were they thinking?&#039; files...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This aint hard to figure out folks, a &#8216;legit&#8217; release date means nothing, as any &#8216;delay&#8217; notice will be sent out as late as possible.  Why? If they delay now, stock price goes down and available capital decreases to help fund the production push.</p>
<p>Also, the phones will likely be in sprint hands far before us &#8216;normals&#8217; see them &#8211; and once that happens, every loose lipped franchise owner with a friend &#8216;higher up&#8217; will be yakking about the thing nonstop.</p>
<p>Lastly, the $299 price makes sense: look at the touch pro, its still on the sprint site at 299, despite being available (subsidized on a sprint contract) for as low as $149.  Sprint will kill the pre with horrible pricing tables &#8211; all their high end phones run 300-350usd, sith SOME running over that occasionally.</p>
<p>Apple/ATT got the iphone price down by requiring a 3yr contract, once they brought the first gen to market and amortized its development and tooling, they have been able to retain the price moving into the 2nd gen version &#8211; which Im sure is a cash COW, as all the major development was already accomplished, and from here on out its software updates.  </p>
<p>Palm cant just give us a phone through sprint and hope to succeed, and most folks must know that they (palm) know this.  I hope they also know that anything over $199 with a contract will KILL sales.  This phone isnt just an iphone competitor or killer &#8211; its a different KIND of phone with similar functionality that helps make a business device more fun.  If they try to spin it as an iphone killer it will fail, simply because the price point WILL be higher for some time unless they have extended contracts.  The business user will like the fact that its compact and trendy, but will get turned off if the focus is on glitz and not function.  A mix of both can be appreciated by all users, but to sacrifice use will kill any potential business users.  If the price was reasonably under $300, say near $250-275 it would likely still do very well, but competing with an 8gb iPhone rather than selling the phone &#8216;on its own&#8217;, the price point must be similar, if not, there has to be a lot to offer above and beyond what the iPhone IS.</p>
<p>I hope palm/sprint get this right, neither company has been able to get the buzz going in their favor for many years, they&#8217;re both &#8216;ho-hum&#8217; companies with the potential to become the next trendy provider/manufacturer, or will both wind up in the &#8216;what were they thinking?&#8217; files&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/#comment-415438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=32923#comment-415438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Might be that Palm wants some info leaked like Kevin said, because of the iPhone 3.0 update and the new iPhone coming out. If the Pre doesn&#039;t come out next month then it will be very close to the release of the new iPhone if it gets released in June. I&#039;m sure Palm wants the Pre in the minds of everyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be that Palm wants some info leaked like Kevin said, because of the iPhone 3.0 update and the new iPhone coming out. If the Pre doesn&#8217;t come out next month then it will be very close to the release of the new iPhone if it gets released in June. I&#8217;m sure Palm wants the Pre in the minds of everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/#comment-415437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=32923#comment-415437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Joe - he is drumming up publicity alright, but if he is lying it is just negative publicity. If he is telling the truth it is negative publicity too as nobody would trust him with confidential info...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe &#8211; he is drumming up publicity alright, but if he is lying it is just negative publicity. If he is telling the truth it is negative publicity too as nobody would trust him with confidential info&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/#comment-415436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=32923#comment-415436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What makes me skeptical is:
http://twitter.com/LogicommInc/status/1408883585

&quot;Battery&#039;s going strong after 8 hours of mixed use&quot;

I guess it depends on what he considers mixed use, but the other tweets have made it sound like he&#039;s using it relatively heavily, and 8 hours and going strong with that sort of usage sounds like wishful thinking.  (Though I&#039;ll still be buying it anyway).

Honestly, if this is a scam, it would make sense.  He&#039;s drumming up more publicity for his company right now than he could any other way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes me skeptical is:<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/LogicommInc/status/1408883585" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/LogicommInc/status/1408883585</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Battery&#8217;s going strong after 8 hours of mixed use&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess it depends on what he considers mixed use, but the other tweets have made it sound like he&#8217;s using it relatively heavily, and 8 hours and going strong with that sort of usage sounds like wishful thinking.  (Though I&#8217;ll still be buying it anyway).</p>
<p>Honestly, if this is a scam, it would make sense.  He&#8217;s drumming up more publicity for his company right now than he could any other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honest John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/#comment-415435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Honest John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=32923#comment-415435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Palm says he&#039;s bluffing...not officially, but I know someone involved in the Pre launch &amp; they have no idea who this Jim Van guy is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palm says he&#8217;s bluffing&#8230;not officially, but I know someone involved in the Pre launch &amp; they have no idea who this Jim Van guy is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/palm-pre-beta-tester-spills-release-date/#comment-415434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=32923#comment-415434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Van&#039;s Identity Confirmed:
http://palmwebos.org/2009/03/28/palm-pre-launching-april-30th/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Van&#8217;s Identity Confirmed:<br />
<a href="http://palmwebos.org/2009/03/28/palm-pre-launching-april-30th/" rel="nofollow">http://palmwebos.org/2009/03/28/palm-pre-launching-april-30th/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

