<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Mobile 9.5 might have you browse on Windows Mobile again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flehhp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/#comment-394933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flehhp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/opera-mobile-95-4#comment-394933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Apple was the first to demonstrate that browsing on a handheld doesn&#039;t have to be a degraded (or degrading) experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Both Opera and Nokia did the zooming and panning thing a long time before the iPhone was announced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>&#8220;Apple was the first to demonstrate that browsing on a handheld doesn&#8217;t have to be a degraded (or degrading) experience.</p>
<p>This is nonsense.</p>
<p>Both Opera and Nokia did the zooming and panning thing a long time before the iPhone was announced.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinsneel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/#comment-394934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevinsneel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/opera-mobile-95-4#comment-394934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kevin says &quot;So What?&quot; to copying from Apple. A la Jordan, I say &quot;Thank you for copying Apple!&quot; iPhone browser works. Stupid not to copy it, unless you have something better...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After all, aren&#039;t our Macs and Windows and KDE and GNU Desktop all stolen from Xerox anyway :)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Kevin says &#8220;So What?&#8221; to copying from Apple. A la Jordan, I say &#8220;Thank you for copying Apple!&#8221; iPhone browser works. Stupid not to copy it, unless you have something better&#8230;</p>
<p>After all, aren&#8217;t our Macs and Windows and KDE and GNU Desktop all stolen from Xerox anyway :)?
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sierra Modro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/#comment-394935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sierra Modro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/opera-mobile-95-4#comment-394935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Well, I&#039;m excited. Pocket Internet Explorer is an unsatisfying tease when it comes to mobile browsing, so I&#039;m hopeful that Opera Mobile will help.&lt;br /&gt;
The iPhone won&#039;t work for me, at least not yet. I can&#039;t seem to get reliable typing on the &quot;keyboard&quot; on it, and I compose far too many emails while mobile to give that up. And the UMTS for traveling to Japan...&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Well, I&#8217;m excited. Pocket Internet Explorer is an unsatisfying tease when it comes to mobile browsing, so I&#8217;m hopeful that Opera Mobile will help.<br />
The iPhone won&#8217;t work for me, at least not yet. I can&#8217;t seem to get reliable typing on the &#8220;keyboard&#8221; on it, and I compose far too many emails while mobile to give that up. And the UMTS for traveling to Japan&#8230;</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron J. Walker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/#comment-394936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron J. Walker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/opera-mobile-95-4#comment-394936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a Windows Mobile user, I already know Internet Explorer is slow and clunky on Windows Mobile, they really didn&#039;t have to devote that much time at the beginning to bashing it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And I am not all that &quot;taken&quot; with Opera mini that came as the default browser on my Motorola Q9 either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I&#039;m probably a strange bird, I have a data plan to be able to access e-mail but just about always (99.8%) wait to access the web from a real computer. The new slate of Mobile browser wars (which only started because of the iPhone) doesn&#039;t get me all that excited yet. But it is good that everyone is trying to innovate again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>As a Windows Mobile user, I already know Internet Explorer is slow and clunky on Windows Mobile, they really didn&#8217;t have to devote that much time at the beginning to bashing it.</p>
<p>And I am not all that &#8220;taken&#8221; with Opera mini that came as the default browser on my Motorola Q9 either.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m probably a strange bird, I have a data plan to be able to access e-mail but just about always (99.8%) wait to access the web from a real computer. The new slate of Mobile browser wars (which only started because of the iPhone) doesn&#8217;t get me all that excited yet. But it is good that everyone is trying to innovate again.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Running</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/#comment-394937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan Running]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/opera-mobile-95-4#comment-394937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;vm-01: I&#039;ve been using Opera Mini since my Mobile trial ran out, and it&#039;s not a bad browser, but it feels every bit like a browser that&#039;s designed to run on little phones with little screens--which, of course, it is. That combined with its lack of integration with Windows Mobile make the overall experience pretty unsatisfying.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>vm-01: I&#8217;ve been using Opera Mini since my Mobile trial ran out, and it&#8217;s not a bad browser, but it feels every bit like a browser that&#8217;s designed to run on little phones with little screens&#8211;which, of course, it is. That combined with its lack of integration with Windows Mobile make the overall experience pretty unsatisfying.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vm-01</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/#comment-394938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vm-01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/opera-mobile-95-4#comment-394938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you don&#039;t want to wait I suggest giving opera mini a try.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have no doubt that the next version of mobile is going to be better but I prefer mini until 9.5 comes out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>If you don&#8217;t want to wait I suggest giving opera mini a try.</p>
<p>I have no doubt that the next version of mobile is going to be better but I prefer mini until 9.5 comes out.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Running</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/opera-mobile-95-4/#comment-394939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan Running]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/opera-mobile-95-4#comment-394939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;At this moment everyone has to take their cues from Apple in order to appear compelling in the mobile browser market, because Apple was the first to demonstrate that browsing on a handheld doesn&#039;t have to be a degraded (or degrading) experience. Apple set the benchmark and until someone else matches it (which I think will be soon), every new mobile browser will be compared to it. If it hadn&#039;t been Apple it would have been another company (maybe Opera, maybe not).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m really excited about Opera Mobile 9.5, but pretty annoyed at having to wait--I just got my first WinMo device a month ago and my free trial of Opera Mobile 8.x just ran out. I really don&#039;t want to buy a license if I&#039;ll just have to do it again in order to get 9.5.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>At this moment everyone has to take their cues from Apple in order to appear compelling in the mobile browser market, because Apple was the first to demonstrate that browsing on a handheld doesn&#8217;t have to be a degraded (or degrading) experience. Apple set the benchmark and until someone else matches it (which I think will be soon), every new mobile browser will be compared to it. If it hadn&#8217;t been Apple it would have been another company (maybe Opera, maybe not).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really excited about Opera Mobile 9.5, but pretty annoyed at having to wait&#8211;I just got my first WinMo device a month ago and my free trial of Opera Mobile 8.x just ran out. I really don&#8217;t want to buy a license if I&#8217;ll just have to do it again in order to get 9.5.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

