Comments on: Office Mobile is a dropped like a bad call on the Q http://gigaom.com/mobile/office_mobile_i/ Sat, 26 May 2012 06:36:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Kevin C. Tofel http://gigaom.com/mobile/office_mobile_i/#comment-44151 Fri, 19 May 2006 19:53:11 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/office_mobile_i#comment-44151 Frank, I know. That’s why I wondered why they had Office Mobile in the video specs for the Q. They must have read my post from yesterday because the video is changed and doesn’t show Office Mobile.

]]> By: Rick Mahn http://gigaom.com/mobile/office_mobile_i/#comment-44152 Fri, 19 May 2006 18:29:08 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/office_mobile_i#comment-44152 That is a shame, good thing there are some viable alternatives available to replace and augment the default functionality.

Too bad that a new phone owner has to shell out to get the functionality that should have been in the box to begin with.

Will Windows Mobile make further inroads in the mobile market: Yes, will Microsoft critics loose ammunition: No! :)

-Rick

]]> By: ctitanic http://gigaom.com/mobile/office_mobile_i/#comment-44153 Fri, 19 May 2006 17:42:22 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/office_mobile_i#comment-44153 WM SP Edition does not include office.

]]> By: Dog sex. http://gigaom.com/mobile/office_mobile_i/#comment-44154 Fri, 19 May 2006 14:42:40 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/office_mobile_i#comment-44154

]]>