<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netbook, notebook, portable, ultra-portable: what&#8217;s in a name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laptop notebook</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laptop notebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Netbook I think -- though I like the damm small coumpter  too :) 
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netbook I think &#8212; though I like the damm small coumpter  too :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tino</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Chippy get netbookportal.com.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chippy get netbookportal.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnkgrl</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tnkgrl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        - NetBook: 10&quot; or less, $500 or less
- Ultra-portable, ultra-light, ultra-thin: 13.3&quot; or less, 3,5 lbs or less, 1&quot; or less, regardless of cost
- Notebook/laptop: the rest
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- NetBook: 10&#8243; or less, $500 or less<br />
- Ultra-portable, ultra-light, ultra-thin: 13.3&#8243; or less, 3,5 lbs or less, 1&#8243; or less, regardless of cost<br />
- Notebook/laptop: the rest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in Norway</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John in Norway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Desktop, laptop, small PC,
these are the words that work for me.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desktop, laptop, small PC,<br />
these are the words that work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlyingShawn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FlyingShawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s how I usually break down the different terms:

UMPC: 4-7&quot; screen, generally touchscreen slate or convertible form factor, and usually attempting to squeeze a decent amount of computing power into that size (ex. Core Solo processor), thus usually making them fairly expensive (usually upwards of $1300). Examples: Samsung Q1 and Q1U series, OQO, HTC Shift, Fujitsu U810

Netbook: 7-10&quot; screen, mostly traditional clamshell designs (with a few &quot;netvertibles,&quot; with hopefully more to come in the future), the defining characteristic is an emphasis on cheaper, lower power-draw components (specifically, Intel Atom or Via Nano type processors) to fulfill the role of a &quot;companion computer&quot; (as opposed to someone&#039;s main computer, which has more horsepower), thus keeping the cost relatively inexpensive (roughly $300-$600). Examples: Asus Eee PC&#039;s, Acer Aspire One, MSI Wind.

Notebook: full size, traditional laptops and tablets, mostly in the 12-17&quot; screen range, and featuring sufficient horsepower to be someone&#039;s primary computer. &quot;Notebooks&quot; have several subcategories, such as:

  -Ultra-Portables: the simplest way to describe these is as &quot;full power notebooks in netbook frames.&quot; Essentially, they try to take the higher-end components needed to be one&#039;s primary computer and squeeze them into smaller frames. Thus they typically have 7-10&quot; screens, Intel Core Solo or Core 2 Duo processors, and are typically fairly expensive ($1500+), so you pay a premium to get all that power in such a small package. Examples: Sony Vaio TX and TZ series, Fujitsu P1600 series.

  -&quot;Thin and Light&quot;: As their name implies, these are essentially &quot;normal&quot; notebooks designed in such a way as to be thinner and/or lighter than the &quot;average&quot; notebook thickness/weight. Typically they have 12-14&quot; screens, are less than 5 pounds (&quot;average&quot; notebooks are 5-7 lb), are less than 1.5&quot; thick (with some examples being ultra-thin, like the Macbook Air or VooDoo Envy), and cost slightly more than &quot;average&quot; sized notebooks of similar power and screen size. Examples: Apple Macbooks, numerous business notebooks from HP, Dell, etc.

  -Desktop Replacements: As their name implies, these notebooks are larger and more powerful than most notebooks, but aren&#039;t intended for mobility.  Typically they have 17&quot;+ screens, weight ranging from 7-10 lb, and desktop-level components (desktop processors, high-end discreet GPUs (sometimes even SLI or Crossfire multi-GPU systems), and excessive amounts of hard drive and RAM). Typically fairly expensive due to their high-end components ($1700-3500+). Examples: HDX Dragon, most Alienware notebooks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how I usually break down the different terms:</p>
<p>UMPC: 4-7&#8243; screen, generally touchscreen slate or convertible form factor, and usually attempting to squeeze a decent amount of computing power into that size (ex. Core Solo processor), thus usually making them fairly expensive (usually upwards of $1300). Examples: Samsung Q1 and Q1U series, OQO, HTC Shift, Fujitsu U810</p>
<p>Netbook: 7-10&#8243; screen, mostly traditional clamshell designs (with a few &#8220;netvertibles,&#8221; with hopefully more to come in the future), the defining characteristic is an emphasis on cheaper, lower power-draw components (specifically, Intel Atom or Via Nano type processors) to fulfill the role of a &#8220;companion computer&#8221; (as opposed to someone&#8217;s main computer, which has more horsepower), thus keeping the cost relatively inexpensive (roughly $300-$600). Examples: Asus Eee PC&#8217;s, Acer Aspire One, MSI Wind.</p>
<p>Notebook: full size, traditional laptops and tablets, mostly in the 12-17&#8243; screen range, and featuring sufficient horsepower to be someone&#8217;s primary computer. &#8220;Notebooks&#8221; have several subcategories, such as:</p>
<p>  -Ultra-Portables: the simplest way to describe these is as &#8220;full power notebooks in netbook frames.&#8221; Essentially, they try to take the higher-end components needed to be one&#8217;s primary computer and squeeze them into smaller frames. Thus they typically have 7-10&#8243; screens, Intel Core Solo or Core 2 Duo processors, and are typically fairly expensive ($1500+), so you pay a premium to get all that power in such a small package. Examples: Sony Vaio TX and TZ series, Fujitsu P1600 series.</p>
<p>  -&#8221;Thin and Light&#8221;: As their name implies, these are essentially &#8220;normal&#8221; notebooks designed in such a way as to be thinner and/or lighter than the &#8220;average&#8221; notebook thickness/weight. Typically they have 12-14&#8243; screens, are less than 5 pounds (&#8220;average&#8221; notebooks are 5-7 lb), are less than 1.5&#8243; thick (with some examples being ultra-thin, like the Macbook Air or VooDoo Envy), and cost slightly more than &#8220;average&#8221; sized notebooks of similar power and screen size. Examples: Apple Macbooks, numerous business notebooks from HP, Dell, etc.</p>
<p>  -Desktop Replacements: As their name implies, these notebooks are larger and more powerful than most notebooks, but aren&#8217;t intended for mobility.  Typically they have 17&#8243;+ screens, weight ranging from 7-10 lb, and desktop-level components (desktop processors, high-end discreet GPUs (sometimes even SLI or Crossfire multi-GPU systems), and excessive amounts of hard drive and RAM). Typically fairly expensive due to their high-end components ($1700-3500+). Examples: HDX Dragon, most Alienware notebooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cptnodegard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cptnodegard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        If you have to know te origin of the erm to decide wheter or not you&#039;re going to use it, youre more biased than the people you&#039;re complaingin about. I agree that ultra mobile, or rather UMPC, is for 5&quot;ish devices that coost a lot of money. Netbook should go up to 10&quot;, notebook anything above. 
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have to know te origin of the erm to decide wheter or not you&#8217;re going to use it, youre more biased than the people you&#8217;re complaingin about. I agree that ultra mobile, or rather UMPC, is for 5&#8243;ish devices that coost a lot of money. Netbook should go up to 10&#8243;, notebook anything above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul V</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul V]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        &quot;Netbooks&quot; are Intel&#039;s marketing term.  They even bought the term &quot;netbook&quot;.  Go to netbook.com and you hit an Intel page.  If you are truly un-biased you won&#039;t use Intels marketing term.  Gartner and IDC use &quot;mini-notebook&quot; not netbook, because they arent biased. 
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Netbooks&#8221; are Intel&#8217;s marketing term.  They even bought the term &#8220;netbook&#8221;.  Go to netbook.com and you hit an Intel page.  If you are truly un-biased you won&#8217;t use Intels marketing term.  Gartner and IDC use &#8220;mini-notebook&#8221; not netbook, because they arent biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benz145</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benz145]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Size requirements of a netbook*
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Size requirements of a netbook*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benz145</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benz145]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        To me, ultra-portable seems to describe a computer that fits the size requirements (or close to them), but doesn&#039;t match the low cost characteristic. Notebooks like the VAIO TX and TZ come to mind immediately.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, ultra-portable seems to describe a computer that fits the size requirements (or close to them), but doesn&#8217;t match the low cost characteristic. Notebooks like the VAIO TX and TZ come to mind immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Murphy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/netbook-noteboo/#comment-362254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Murphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/netbook-noteboo#comment-362254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m favouring, Damn small computer!

The classification of devices is becoming ridiculous, and is it so we know how to write about them in a uniform fashion?
Shouldn&#039;t all computers &quot;just get along&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m favouring, Damn small computer!</p>
<p>The classification of devices is becoming ridiculous, and is it so we know how to write about them in a uniform fashion?<br />
Shouldn&#8217;t all computers &#8220;just get along&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

