Comments on: Motorola’s Q11 adds WiFi, drops 3G http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorolas-q11-a/ Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Bruno http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorolas-q11-a/#comment-363535 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:23:35 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/motorolas-q11-a#comment-363535 Is it just me or have most handset makers lost all iamgination? All these phones are the same, the new models do not seem to bring out anything that has not been around for a year or two already…

]]> By: Kevin C. Tofel http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorolas-q11-a/#comment-363536 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:29:59 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/motorolas-q11-a#comment-363536 I’m not claiming it runs WinMo 6.1; that’s what the Motorola product page says. ;) They don’t specify the edition, but they also don’t mention a touchscreen display. I’d expect WM 6.1 Standard.

]]> By: SiteCharts http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorolas-q11-a/#comment-363537 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:19:45 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/10/motorolas-q11-a#comment-363537 After the Tilt/Kaiser/TytnII issue with HTC, I have sworn off all HTC phones for the near future. They always promise the world … and don’t deliver half of it.

This would have been a great phone (maybe even the successor to my Tilt) if it had 3G.
I assume it has a touch screen since you claim it runs WinMo 6.1 … not WinMo 6.1 Standard?

]]>