<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motorola Q ready for the Holidays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_read/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_read/#comment-41013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2005/09/26/motorola_q_read#comment-41013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the confusion started because the Treo 650 is currently at 320x320 and a lot of people didn&#039;t think the 700w would be a step backwards with respect to display as it seems to be.

Treo 650 specs: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palm.com/us/products/smartphones/treo650/details.epl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.palm.com/us/products/smartphones/treo650/details.epl&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the confusion started because the Treo 650 is currently at 320&#215;320 and a lot of people didn&#8217;t think the 700w would be a step backwards with respect to display as it seems to be.</p>
<p>Treo 650 specs: <a href="http://www.palm.com/us/products/smartphones/treo650/details.epl" rel="nofollow">http://www.palm.com/us/products/smartphones/treo650/details.epl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_read/#comment-41014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2005/09/26/motorola_q_read#comment-41014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Yep, it&#039;ll be 240 x 240
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Yep, it&#8217;ll be 240 x 240</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_read/#comment-41015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2005/09/26/motorola_q_read#comment-41015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t the Treo have to be 240 x 240? Unless it&#039;s 480 x 480, that is...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://kctofel.blogspot.com/2005/09/treo-700w-screen-resolution.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://kctofel.blogspot.com/2005/09/treo-700w-screen-resolution.html&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the Treo have to be 240 x 240? Unless it&#8217;s 480 x 480, that is&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://kctofel.blogspot.com/2005/09/treo-700w-screen-resolution.html" rel="nofollow">http://kctofel.blogspot.com/2005/09/treo-700w-screen-resolution.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

